Literature DB >> 15224858

Long-term auditory adaptation to a modified peripheral frequency map.

M A Svirsky1, A Silveira, H Neuburger, Su-Wooi Teoh, H Suárez.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Cochlear implants (CIs) attempt to mimic the tonotopicity of the normal ear by stimulating more basal regions of the cochlea in response to higher frequencies. However, there may be a mismatch between the normal place-frequency map and that implemented by a CI.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Aiming to measure this potential mismatch and its changes over time, the present study used a method-of-adjustment procedure where CI users and normal-hearing listeners selected synthetic vowels to match prespecified vowel targets. Data from CI users were obtained longitudinally, starting on the day of initial stimulation and continuing for 2 years.
RESULTS: CI users showed a significant amount of initial mismatch with respect to the normal-hearing listeners, but they also showed significant learning and adaptation over time and achieved nearly normal performance after some experience with the CI.
CONCLUSION: In general, the adaptation process took several months, suggesting that some CI users may benefit from alternative signal processing or rehabilitation procedures designed to facilitate perceptual learning after cochlear implantation.

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15224858

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Otolaryngol        ISSN: 0001-6489            Impact factor:   1.494


  33 in total

1.  Current and planned cochlear implant research at New York University Laboratory for Translational Auditory Research.

Authors:  Mario A Svirsky; Matthew B Fitzgerald; Arlene Neuman; Elad Sagi; Chin-Tuan Tan; Darlene Ketten; Brett Martin
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 1.664

2.  A new software tool to optimize frequency table selection for cochlear implants.

Authors:  Daniel Jethanamest; Chin-Tuan Tan; Matthew B Fitzgerald; Mario A Svirsky
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 2.311

Review 3.  Perceptual learning and auditory training in cochlear implant recipients.

Authors:  Qian-Jie Fu; John J Galvin
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2007-09

4.  A Smartphone Application for Customized Frequency Table Selection in Cochlear Implants.

Authors:  Daniel Jethanamest; Mahan Azadpour; Annette M Zeman; Elad Sagi; Mario A Svirsky
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 2.311

5.  Feasibility of real-time selection of frequency tables in an acoustic simulation of a cochlear implant.

Authors:  Matthew B Fitzgerald; Elad Sagi; Tasnim A Morbiwala; Chin-Tuan Tan; Mario A Svirsky
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2013 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.570

6.  Pitch Matching between Electrical Stimulation of a Cochlear Implant and Acoustic Stimuli Presented to a Contralateral Ear with Residual Hearing.

Authors:  Chin-Tuan Tan; Brett Martin; Mario A Svirsky
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 1.664

7.  Bimodal Cochlear Implant Listeners' Ability to Perceive Minimal Audible Angle Differences.

Authors:  Ashley Zaleski-King; Matthew J Goupell; Dragana Barac-Cikoja; Matthew Bakke
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2018-11-12       Impact factor: 1.664

8.  Counting or discriminating the number of voices to assess binaural fusion with single-sided vocoders.

Authors:  Jessica M Wess; Nathaniel J Spencer; Joshua G W Bernstein
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Effects of spectral shifting on speech perception in noise.

Authors:  Tianhao Li; Qian-Jie Fu
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2010-09-22       Impact factor: 3.208

10.  Simulating the effects of spread of electric excitation on musical tuning and melody identification with a cochlear implant.

Authors:  Anthony J Spahr; Leonid M Litvak; Michael F Dorman; Ashley R Bohanan; Lakshmi N Mishra
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2008-07-29       Impact factor: 2.297

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.