Literature DB >> 28697658

Determining the minimum number of electrodes that need to be pitch matched to accurately estimate pitch matches across the array.

Julia Stelmach1, David M Landsberger2,3, Monica Padilla2,3,4, Justin M Aronoff1,3,5.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: With bilateral cochlear implant (CI) users there is typically a place mismatch between the locations stimulated by the left and right electrode arrays. This mismatch can affect performance, potentially limiting binaural benefits. One way to address this is by perceptually realigning the arrays such that a given frequency in the input stimulates perceptually matched locations in the two ears. A clinically feasible technique is needed that can determine the appropriate perceptual alignment. A pitch matching task can potentially be used for this, but only if it can be performed in a clinically feasible amount of time. The objective of this study was to determine the minimal number of electrodes that need to be pitch matched to accurately determine pitch matches across the entire array.
DESIGN: A retrospective analysis of pitch matching data was conducted. Subsets of pitch matches were selected and the predicted pitch matching across the array was compared to that predicted by the full dataset. STUDY SAMPLE: 16 bilateral CI users.
RESULTS: The results indicated that nine pitch matches are sufficient, which can typically be obtained in approximately 7 min.
CONCLUSION: The results reveal a clinically feasible method for determining pitch matches across the array.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cochlear implants; anatomy & physiology; bilateral cochlear implants; instrumentation; pitch matching; psychoacoustics/hearing science

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28697658      PMCID: PMC5752435          DOI: 10.1080/14992027.2017.1346302

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Audiol        ISSN: 1499-2027            Impact factor:   2.117


  21 in total

1.  Studies on bilateral cochlear implants at the University of Wisconsin's Binaural Hearing and Speech Laboratory.

Authors:  Ruth Y Litovsky; Matthew J Goupell; Shelly Godar; Tina Grieco-Calub; Gary L Jones; Soha N Garadat; Smita Agrawal; Alan Kan; Ann Todd; Christi Hess; Sara Misurelli
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 1.664

2.  Effect of mismatched place-of-stimulation on binaural fusion and lateralization in bilateral cochlear-implant users.

Authors:  Alan Kan; Corey Stoelb; Ruth Y Litovsky; Matthew J Goupell
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Sensitivity to interaural time difference with bilateral cochlear implants: Development over time and effect of interaural electrode spacing.

Authors:  Becky B Poon; Donald K Eddington; Victor Noel; H Steven Colburn
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Comparison of speech recognition and localization performance in bilateral and unilateral cochlear implant users matched on duration of deafness and age at implantation.

Authors:  Camille C Dunn; Richard S Tyler; Sarah Oakley; Bruce J Gantz; William Noble
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 3.570

5.  Cochlear implants: histopathologic findings related to performance in 16 human temporal bones.

Authors:  J Fayad; F H Linthicum; S R Otto; F R Galey; W F House
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol       Date:  1991-10       Impact factor: 1.547

6.  Effects of interaural pitch matching and auditory image centering on binaural sensitivity in cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Alan Kan; Ruth Y Litovsky; Matthew J Goupell
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2015 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.570

7.  Effect of mismatched place-of-stimulation on the salience of binaural cues in conditions that simulate bilateral cochlear-implant listening.

Authors:  Matthew J Goupell; Corey Stoelb; Alan Kan; Ruth Y Litovsky
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Effects of spectral shifting on speech perception in noise.

Authors:  Tianhao Li; Qian-Jie Fu
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2010-09-22       Impact factor: 3.208

9.  Speech recognition by bilateral cochlear implant users in a cocktail-party setting.

Authors:  Philipos C Loizou; Yi Hu; Ruth Litovsky; Gongqiang Yu; Robert Peters; Jennifer Lake; Peter Roland
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Comparison of Interaural Electrode Pairing Methods for Bilateral Cochlear Implants.

Authors:  Hongmei Hu; Mathias Dietz
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2015-12-01       Impact factor: 3.293

View more
  2 in total

1.  Pitch Matching Adapts Even for Bilateral Cochlear Implant Users with Relatively Small Initial Pitch Differences Across the Ears.

Authors:  Justin M Aronoff; Hannah E Staisloff; Abbigail Kirchner; Daniel H Lee; Julia Stelmach
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2019-08-05

2.  An automated A-value measurement tool for accurate cochlear duct length estimation.

Authors:  John E Iyaniwura; Mai Elfarnawany; Hanif M Ladak; Sumit K Agrawal
Journal:  J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2018-01-22
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.