PURPOSE: To objectively compare quantitative parameters related to image quality attained at coronary magnetic resonance (MR) angiography of the right coronary artery (RCA) performed at 7 T and 3 T. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Institutional review board approval was obtained, and volunteers provided signed informed consent. Ten healthy adult volunteers (mean age ± standard deviation, 25 years ± 4; seven men, three women) underwent navigator-gated three-dimensional MR angiography of the RCA at 7 T and 3 T. For 7 T, a custom-built quadrature radiofrequency transmit-receive surface coil was used. At 3 T, a commercial body radiofrequency transmit coil and a cardiac coil array for signal reception were used. Segmented k-space gradient-echo imaging with spectrally selective adiabatic fat suppression was performed, and imaging parameters were similar at both field strengths. Contrast-to-noise ratio between blood and epicardial fat; signal-to-noise ratio of the blood pool; RCA vessel sharpness, diameter, and length; and navigator efficiency were quantified at both field strengths and compared by using a Mann-Whitney U test. RESULTS: The contrast-to-noise ratio between blood and epicardial fat was significantly improved at 7 T when compared with that at 3 T (87 ± 34 versus 52 ± 13; P = .01). Signal-to-noise ratio of the blood pool was increased at 7 T (109 ± 47 versus 67 ± 19; P = .02). Vessel sharpness obtained at 7 T was also higher (58% ± 9 versus 50% ± 5; P = .04). At the same time, RCA vessel diameter and length and navigator efficiency showed no significant field strength-dependent difference. CONCLUSION: In our quantitative and qualitative study comparing in vivo human imaging of the RCA at 7 T and 3 T in young healthy volunteers, parameters related to image quality attained at 7 T equal or surpass those from 3 T.
PURPOSE: To objectively compare quantitative parameters related to image quality attained at coronary magnetic resonance (MR) angiography of the right coronary artery (RCA) performed at 7 T and 3 T. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Institutional review board approval was obtained, and volunteers provided signed informed consent. Ten healthy adult volunteers (mean age ± standard deviation, 25 years ± 4; seven men, three women) underwent navigator-gated three-dimensional MR angiography of the RCA at 7 T and 3 T. For 7 T, a custom-built quadrature radiofrequency transmit-receive surface coil was used. At 3 T, a commercial body radiofrequency transmit coil and a cardiac coil array for signal reception were used. Segmented k-space gradient-echo imaging with spectrally selective adiabatic fat suppression was performed, and imaging parameters were similar at both field strengths. Contrast-to-noise ratio between blood and epicardial fat; signal-to-noise ratio of the blood pool; RCA vessel sharpness, diameter, and length; and navigator efficiency were quantified at both field strengths and compared by using a Mann-Whitney U test. RESULTS: The contrast-to-noise ratio between blood and epicardial fat was significantly improved at 7 T when compared with that at 3 T (87 ± 34 versus 52 ± 13; P = .01). Signal-to-noise ratio of the blood pool was increased at 7 T (109 ± 47 versus 67 ± 19; P = .02). Vessel sharpness obtained at 7 T was also higher (58% ± 9 versus 50% ± 5; P = .04). At the same time, RCA vessel diameter and length and navigator efficiency showed no significant field strength-dependent difference. CONCLUSION: In our quantitative and qualitative study comparing in vivo human imaging of the RCA at 7 T and 3 T in young healthy volunteers, parameters related to image quality attained at 7 T equal or surpass those from 3 T.
Authors: J T Vaughan; M Garwood; C M Collins; W Liu; L DelaBarre; G Adriany; P Andersen; H Merkle; R Goebel; M B Smith; K Ugurbil Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2001-07 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Phillip C Yang; Patricia Nguyen; Ann Shimakawa; Jean Brittain; John Pauly; Dwight Nishimura; Bob Hu; Michael McConnell Journal: J Cardiovasc Magn Reson Date: 2004 Impact factor: 5.364
Authors: Torsten Sommer; Matthias Hackenbroch; Ulrich Hofer; Alexandra Schmiedel; Winfried A Willinek; Sebastian Flacke; Jürgen Gieseke; Frank Träber; Rolf Fimmers; Harold Litt; Hans Schild Journal: Radiology Date: 2005-01-21 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Mehmet Akçakaya; Tamer A Basha; Raymond H Chan; Hussein Rayatzadeh; Kraig V Kissinger; Beth Goddu; Lois A Goepfert; Warren J Manning; Reza Nezafat Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2012-03-05 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Christof Thalhammer; Wolfgang Renz; Lukas Winter; Fabian Hezel; Jan Rieger; Harald Pfeiffer; Andreas Graessl; Frank Seifert; Werner Hoffmann; Florian von Knobelsdorff-Brenkenhoff; Valeriy Tkachenko; Jeanette Schulz-Menger; Peter Kellman; Thoralf Niendorf Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2012-06-15 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: Sahar Soleimanifard; Michael Schär; Allison G Hays; Jerry L Prince; Robert G Weiss; Matthias Stuber Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2012-08-22 Impact factor: 4.668