Literature DB >> 20831419

Researcher perspectives on disclosure of incidental findings in genetic research.

Meredith C Meacham1, Helene Starks, Wylie Burke, Kelly Edwards.   

Abstract

Genetic research can produce information that is beyond the aims of the research study yet may be of clinical or personal interest to study participants. We conducted semi-structured interviews with 44 researchers who were asked to describe how they would respond to a hypothetical vignette regarding the disclosure of findings with unanticipated clinical significance to research study participants. Interviews were transcribed and analyzed using content and thematic analyses. Researchers' decision-making processes about whether to disclose incidental findings were governed by potentially conflicting duties in three primary domains: information quality, adherence to rules, and participant welfare. There are several actions researchers can take to prepare for incidental findings, including: adding specific language in informed consent documents to state clearly how investigators will handle disclosure; exploring how prepared participants might be during the consent process to make decisions about how they would like to be approached in the event of incidental findings; developing procedures for appropriately communicating individual results and providing follow-up support based on participant preferences; and, in genetic research, having an awareness of the range of traits expressed by the genes under study.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20831419      PMCID: PMC3413406          DOI: 10.1525/jer.2010.5.3.31

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics        ISSN: 1556-2646            Impact factor:   1.742


  23 in total

1.  Informing study participants of research results: an ethical imperative.

Authors:  Conrad V Fernandez; Eric Kodish; Charles Weijer
Journal:  IRB       Date:  2003 May-Jun

2.  Considerations and costs of disclosing study findings to research participants.

Authors:  Conrad V Fernandez; Chris Skedgel; Charles Weijer
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2004-04-27       Impact factor: 8.262

3.  The ancillary-care responsibilities of medical researchers. An ethical framework for thinking about the clinical care that researchers owe their subjects.

Authors:  Henry S Richardson; Leah Belsky
Journal:  Hastings Cent Rep       Date:  2004 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.683

4.  Three approaches to qualitative content analysis.

Authors:  Hsiu-Fang Hsieh; Sarah E Shannon
Journal:  Qual Health Res       Date:  2005-11

5.  Disclosing individual results of clinical research: implications of respect for participants.

Authors:  David I Shalowitz; Franklin G Miller
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2005-08-10       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  Implications of disclosing individual results of clinical research.

Authors:  Ellen Wright Clayton; Lainie Friedman Ross
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2006-01-04       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  Disclosing individual genetic results to research participants.

Authors:  Vardit Ravitsky; Benjamin S Wilfond
Journal:  Am J Bioeth       Date:  2006 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 11.229

8.  Relationships with test-tubes: where's the reciprocity?

Authors:  Kelly Fryer-Edwards; Stephanie M Fullerton
Journal:  Am J Bioeth       Date:  2006 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 11.229

9.  Informed consent for population-based research involving genetics.

Authors:  L M Beskow; W Burke; J F Merz; P A Barr; S Terry; V B Penchaszadeh; L O Gostin; M Gwinn; M J Khoury
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2001-11-14       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  The emergence of an ethical duty to disclose genetic research results: international perspectives.

Authors:  Bartha Maria Knoppers; Yann Joly; Jacques Simard; Francine Durocher
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2006-07-26       Impact factor: 4.246

View more
  39 in total

1.  Researcher and institutional review board chair perspectives on incidental findings in genomic research.

Authors:  Janet K Williams; Sandra Daack-Hirsch; Martha Driessnack; Nancy Downing; Laura Shinkunas; Debra Brandt; Christian Simon
Journal:  Genet Test Mol Biomarkers       Date:  2012-02-21

Review 2.  Incidental findings from clinical genome-wide sequencing: a review.

Authors:  Z Lohn; S Adam; P H Birch; J M Friedman
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2013-05-26       Impact factor: 2.537

3.  Secondary variants--in defense of a more fitting term in the incidental findings debate.

Authors:  Gabrielle M Christenhusz; Koenraad Devriendt; Kris Dierickx
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2013-05-22       Impact factor: 4.246

4.  Not so simple: a quasi-experimental study of how researchers adjudicate genetic research results.

Authors:  Robin Zoe Hayeems; Fiona Alice Miller; Li Li; Jessica Peace Bytautas
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2011-03-16       Impact factor: 4.246

Review 5.  Disclosure of incidental findings from next-generation sequencing in pediatric genomic research.

Authors:  Ruqayyah Abdul-Karim; Benjamin E Berkman; David Wendler; Annette Rid; Javed Khan; Tom Badgett; Sara Chandros Hull
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2013-02-11       Impact factor: 7.124

6.  Canadian Research Ethics Board Leadership Attitudes to the Return of Genetic Research Results to Individuals and Their Families.

Authors:  Conrad V Fernandez; P Pearl O'Rourke; Laura M Beskow
Journal:  J Law Med Ethics       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 1.718

7.  Incidental and clinically actionable genetic variants in 1005 whole exomes and genomes from Qatar.

Authors:  Abhinav Jain; Shrey Gandhi; Remya Koshy; Vinod Scaria
Journal:  Mol Genet Genomics       Date:  2018-03-20       Impact factor: 3.291

8.  Engaging Hmong adults in genomic and pharmacogenomic research: Toward reducing health disparities in genomic knowledge using a community-based participatory research approach.

Authors:  Kathleen A Culhane-Pera; Robert J Straka; MaiKia Moua; Youssef Roman; Pachia Vue; Kang Xiaaj; May Xia Lo; Mai Lor
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2017-01-10

9.  How could disclosing incidental information from whole-genome sequencing affect patient behavior?

Authors:  Kurt D Christensen; Robert C Green
Journal:  Per Med       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 2.512

10.  Psychiatric genetics researchers' views on offering return of results to individual participants.

Authors:  Kristin M Kostick; Cody Brannan; Stacey Pereira; Gabriel Lázaro-Muñoz
Journal:  Am J Med Genet B Neuropsychiatr Genet       Date:  2018-10-25       Impact factor: 3.568

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.