Literature DB >> 16204405

Three approaches to qualitative content analysis.

Hsiu-Fang Hsieh1, Sarah E Shannon.   

Abstract

Content analysis is a widely used qualitative research technique. Rather than being a single method, current applications of content analysis show three distinct approaches: conventional, directed, or summative. All three approaches are used to interpret meaning from the content of text data and, hence, adhere to the naturalistic paradigm. The major differences among the approaches are coding schemes, origins of codes, and threats to trustworthiness. In conventional content analysis, coding categories are derived directly from the text data. With a directed approach, analysis starts with a theory or relevant research findings as guidance for initial codes. A summative content analysis involves counting and comparisons, usually of keywords or content, followed by the interpretation of the underlying context. The authors delineate analytic procedures specific to each approach and techniques addressing trustworthiness with hypothetical examples drawn from the area of end-of-life care.

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16204405     DOI: 10.1177/1049732305276687

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Qual Health Res        ISSN: 1049-7323


  2000 in total

1.  The power of the liver transplant waiting list: a case presentation.

Authors:  Lissi Hansen; Yi Yan; Susan J Rosenkranz
Journal:  Am J Crit Care       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 2.228

2.  Evaluation of the Use of a Virtual Patient on Student Competence and Confidence in Performing Simulated Clinic Visits.

Authors:  Catherine A Taglieri; Steven J Crosby; Kristin Zimmerman; Tulip Schneider; Dhiren K Patel
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 2.047

3.  HIV-Uninfected Kenyan Adolescent and Young Women Share Perspectives on Using Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis During Pregnancy.

Authors:  Jillian Pintye; Kristin M Beima-Sofie; Pamela A Makabong'O; Anne Njoroge; Susan Brown Trinidad; Renee A Heffron; Jared M Baeten; Connie Celum; Daniel Matemo; John Kinuthia; Maureen C Kelley; Grace C John-Stewart
Journal:  AIDS Patient Care STDS       Date:  2018-07-23       Impact factor: 5.078

4.  A little help from my friends: social support in palliative rehabilitation.

Authors:  N A Rutkowski; S Lebel; K Richardson; B Mutsaers; M Chasen; A Feldstain
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2018-12-01       Impact factor: 3.677

5.  Oncology communities of practice: insights from a qualitative analysis.

Authors:  W Fingrut; L A Beck; D Lo
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2018-12-01       Impact factor: 3.677

6.  Research funded by the National Institutes of Health on the health of lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender populations.

Authors:  Robert W S Coulter; Karey S Kenst; Deborah J Bowen
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2013-12-12       Impact factor: 9.308

7.  Improving symptom management in hemodialysis patients: identifying barriers and future directions.

Authors:  Rachel Feldman; Nathaniel Berman; M Cary Reid; Jordan Roberts; Rouzi Shengelia; Kaylan Christianer; Brian Eiss; Ronald D Adelman
Journal:  J Palliat Med       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 2.947

8.  Applying Visual Research Methods in Pharmacy Education.

Authors:  Jan Armstrong; Krystal L Ward
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 2.047

9.  Fatigue and Sleep Disturbance Related to Perceived Stress in Chinese HIV-Positive Individuals: A Mixed Methods Study.

Authors:  Wei-Ti Chen; Cheng-Shi Shiu; Joyce P Yang; Shih-Yu Lee; Tony Szu-Hsien Lee; Jane M Simoni; Mei-Juan Bao; Hong-Zhou Lu
Journal:  J AIDS Clin Res       Date:  2013-06-18

10.  Perception and fulfillment of cancer patients' nursing professional social support needs: from the health care personnel point of view.

Authors:  Jingfang Hong; Yongxia Song; Jingjing Liu; Weili Wang; Wenru Wang
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2013-11-28       Impact factor: 3.603

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.