Literature DB >> 24319470

How could disclosing incidental information from whole-genome sequencing affect patient behavior?

Kurt D Christensen1, Robert C Green.   

Abstract

In this article, we argue that disclosure of incidental findings from whole-genome sequencing has the potential to motivate individuals to change health behaviors through psychological mechanisms that differ from typical risk assessment interventions. Their ability to do so, however, is likely to be highly contingent upon the nature of the incidental findings and how they are disclosed, the context of the disclosure and the characteristics of the patient. Moreover, clinicians need to be aware that behavioral responses may occur in unanticipated ways. This article argues for commentators and policy makers to take a cautious but optimistic perspective while empirical evidence is collected through ongoing research involving whole-genome sequencing and the disclosure of incidental information.

Entities:  

Keywords:  contextual factor; health behavior; incidental finding; whole-genome sequencing

Year:  2013        PMID: 24319470      PMCID: PMC3852635          DOI: 10.2217/pme.13.24

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Per Med        ISSN: 1741-0541            Impact factor:   2.512


  60 in total

1.  Use of self-help materials and smoking cessation among proactively recruited and volunteer intervention participants.

Authors:  C M McBride; S J Curry; L C Grothaus; D Rosner; D Louie; E H Wagner
Journal:  Am J Health Promot       Date:  1998 May-Jun

2.  "Catastrophic" pathways to smoking cessation: findings from national survey.

Authors:  Robert West; Taj Sohal
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2006-01-27

Review 3.  Information processing in the context of genetic risk: implications for genetic-risk communication.

Authors:  Holly Etchegary; Colin Perrier
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2007-05-01       Impact factor: 2.537

4.  Unplanned quit attempts--results from a U.S. sample of smokers and ex-smokers.

Authors:  Stuart G Ferguson; Saul Shiffman; Joseph G Gitchell; Mark A Sembower; Robert West
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2009-06-09       Impact factor: 4.244

5.  Proactive telephone counseling for smoking cessation: meta-analyses by recruitment channel and methodological quality.

Authors:  Flora Tzelepis; Christine L Paul; Raoul A Walsh; Patrick McElduff; Jenny Knight
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2011-06-10       Impact factor: 13.506

6.  Personal genome research : what should the participant be told?

Authors:  Amy L McGuire; James R Lupski
Journal:  Trends Genet       Date:  2010-04-08       Impact factor: 11.639

7.  Taxonomizing, sizing, and overcoming the incidentalome.

Authors:  Isaac S Kohane; Michael Hsing; Sek Won Kong
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2012-02-09       Impact factor: 8.822

Review 8.  Effects of communicating DNA-based disease risk estimates on risk-reducing behaviours.

Authors:  Theresa M Marteau; David P French; Simon J Griffin; A T Prevost; Stephen Sutton; Clare Watkinson; Sophie Attwood; Gareth J Hollands
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2010-10-06

Review 9.  Impact of genetic notification on smoking cessation: systematic review and pooled-analysis.

Authors:  Sylviane de Viron; Johan Van der Heyden; Elena Ambrosino; Marc Arbyn; Angela Brand; Herman Van Oyen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-07-11       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  The beliefs, motivations, and expectations of parents who have enrolled their children in a genetic biorepository.

Authors:  Erin D Harris; Sonja I Ziniel; Jonathan G Amatruda; Catherine M Clinton; Sarah K Savage; Patrick L Taylor; Noelle L Huntington; Robert C Green; Ingrid A Holm
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2012-01-26       Impact factor: 8.822

View more
  9 in total

1.  Ethical signposts for clinical geneticists in secondary variant and incidental finding disclosure discussions.

Authors:  Gabrielle M Christenhusz; Koenraad Devriendt; Hilde Van Esch; Kris Dierickx
Journal:  Med Health Care Philos       Date:  2015-08

2.  Ethical, legal and social implications of incorporating personalized medicine into healthcare.

Authors:  Kyle B Brothers; Mark A Rothstein
Journal:  Per Med       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 2.512

3.  Psychological outcomes related to exome and genome sequencing result disclosure: a meta-analysis of seven Clinical Sequencing Exploratory Research (CSER) Consortium studies.

Authors:  Jill O Robinson; Julia Wynn; Barbara Biesecker; Leslie G Biesecker; Barbara Bernhardt; Kyle B Brothers; Wendy K Chung; Kurt D Christensen; Robert C Green; Amy L McGuire; M Ragan Hart; Ida Griesemer; Donald L Patrick; Christine Rini; David Veenstra; Angel M Cronin; Stacy W Gray
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2019-06-13       Impact factor: 8.822

4.  Do participants in genome sequencing studies of psychiatric disorders wish to be informed of their results? A survey study.

Authors:  Elise T Bui; Natalie K Anderson; Layla Kassem; Francis J McMahon
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-07-01       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Disclosure of genetic information and change in dietary intake: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Daiva E Nielsen; Ahmed El-Sohemy
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-11-14       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Views of rare disease participants in a UK whole-genome sequencing study towards secondary findings: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Michael P Mackley; Edward Blair; Michael Parker; Jenny C Taylor; Hugh Watkins; Elizabeth Ormondroyd
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2018-02-13       Impact factor: 4.246

7.  Genomic information and a person's right not to know: A closer look at variations in hypothetical informational preferences in a German sample.

Authors:  Laura Flatau; Markus Reitt; Gunnar Duttge; Christian Lenk; Barbara Zoll; Wolfgang Poser; Alexandra Weber; Urs Heilbronner; Marcella Rietschel; Jana Strohmaier; Rebekka Kesberg; Jonas Nagel; Thomas G Schulze
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-06-20       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  A qualitative study among patients with an inherited retinal disease on the meaning of genomic unsolicited findings.

Authors:  Ignaas Devisch; Elfride De Baere; Marlies Saelaert; Heidi Mertes; Tania Moerenhout; Caroline Van Cauwenbergh; Bart P Leroy
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-08-04       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Eliciting preferences on secondary findings: the Preferences Instrument for Genomic Secondary Results.

Authors:  Kyle B Brothers; Kelly M East; Whitley V Kelley; M Frances Wright; Matthew J Westbrook; Carla A Rich; Kevin M Bowling; Edward J Lose; E Martina Bebin; Shirley Simmons; John A Myers; Greg Barsh; Richard M Myers; Greg M Cooper; Jill M Pulley; Mark A Rothstein; Ellen Wright Clayton
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2016-08-25       Impact factor: 8.822

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.