Literature DB >> 23400601

Disclosure of incidental findings from next-generation sequencing in pediatric genomic research.

Ruqayyah Abdul-Karim1, Benjamin E Berkman, David Wendler, Annette Rid, Javed Khan, Tom Badgett, Sara Chandros Hull.   

Abstract

Next-generation sequencing technologies will likely be used with increasing frequency in pediatric research. One consequence will be the increased identification of individual genomic research findings that are incidental to the aims of the research. Although researchers and ethicists have raised theoretical concerns about incidental findings in the context of genetic research, next-generation sequencing will make this once largely hypothetical concern an increasing reality. Most commentators have begun to accept the notion that there is some duty to disclose individual genetic research results to research subjects; however, the scope of that duty remains unclear. These issues are especially complicated in the pediatric setting, where subjects cannot currently but typically will eventually be able to make their own medical decisions at the age of adulthood. This article discusses the management of incidental findings in the context of pediatric genomic research. We provide an overview of the current literature and propose a framework to manage incidental findings in this unique context, based on what we believe is a limited responsibility to disclose. We hope this will be a useful source of guidance for investigators, institutional review boards, and bioethicists that anticipates the complicated ethical issues raised by advances in genomic technology.

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23400601      PMCID: PMC3581837          DOI: 10.1542/peds.2012-0084

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatrics        ISSN: 0031-4005            Impact factor:   7.124


  46 in total

1.  Genetic testing in adoption. The American Society of Human Genetics Social Issues Committee and The American College of Medical Genetics Social, Ethical, and Legal Issues Committee.

Authors: 
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 11.025

2.  Informed consent for research on stored blood and tissue samples: a survey of institutional review board practices.

Authors:  Mary Terrell White; Jennifer Gamm
Journal:  Account Res       Date:  2002 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 2.622

3.  The coming explosion in genetic testing--is there a duty to recontact?

Authors:  Reed E Pyeritz
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2011-10-13       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 4.  Disclosure of individual genetic data to research participants: the debate reconsidered.

Authors:  Annelien L Bredenoord; Hester Y Kroes; Edwin Cuppen; Michael Parker; Johannes J M van Delden
Journal:  Trends Genet       Date:  2010-12-27       Impact factor: 11.639

5.  Genetic testings for cancer: the surgeon's critical role. Ethical and legal issues associated with genetic testing.

Authors:  H T Greely
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 6.113

6.  Personal genome research : what should the participant be told?

Authors:  Amy L McGuire; James R Lupski
Journal:  Trends Genet       Date:  2010-04-08       Impact factor: 11.639

7.  Incidental findings in pediatric research.

Authors:  Benjamin S Wilfond; Katherine J Carpenter
Journal:  J Law Med Ethics       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 1.718

8.  Understanding incidental findings in the context of genetics and genomics.

Authors:  Mildred K Cho
Journal:  J Law Med Ethics       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 1.718

9.  Response to open peer commentaries on "do researchers have an obligation to actively look for genetic incidental findings?".

Authors:  Catherine Gliwa; Benjamin E Berkman
Journal:  Am J Bioeth       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 11.229

10.  Return of research results from genomic biobanks: cost matters.

Authors:  Marianna J Bledsoe; Ellen Wright Clayton; Amy L McGuire; William E Grizzle; P Pearl O'Rourke; Nikolajs Zeps
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2012-08-30       Impact factor: 8.822

View more
  36 in total

1.  Preferences for return of incidental findings from genome sequencing among women diagnosed with breast cancer at a young age.

Authors:  K A Kaphingst; J Ivanovich; B B Biesecker; R Dresser; J Seo; L G Dressler; P J Goodfellow; M S Goodman
Journal:  Clin Genet       Date:  2015-05-05       Impact factor: 4.438

2.  Return of whole-genome sequencing results in paediatric research: a statement of the P3G international paediatrics platform.

Authors:  Bartha Maria Knoppers; Denise Avard; Karine Sénécal; Ma'n H Zawati
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2013-08-07       Impact factor: 4.246

3.  A genetic counselor's guide to using next-generation sequencing in clinical practice.

Authors:  Flavia M Facio; Kristy Lee; Julianne M O'Daniel
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2013-10-24       Impact factor: 2.537

4.  Comprehensive genetic testing approach for major inherited kidney diseases, using next-generation sequencing with a custom panel.

Authors:  Takayasu Mori; Kazuyoshi Hosomichi; Motoko Chiga; Shintaro Mandai; Hirofumi Nakaoka; Eisei Sohara; Tomokazu Okado; Tatemitsu Rai; Sei Sasaki; Ituro Inoue; Shinichi Uchida
Journal:  Clin Exp Nephrol       Date:  2016-02-26       Impact factor: 2.801

5.  Return of individual results in epilepsy genomic research: A view from the field.

Authors:  Ruth Ottman; Catharine Freyer; Heather C Mefford; Annapurna Poduri; Daniel H Lowenstein
Journal:  Epilepsia       Date:  2018-08-10       Impact factor: 5.864

Review 6.  Management and return of incidental genomic findings in clinical trials.

Authors:  C Ayuso; J M Millan; R Dal-Re
Journal:  Pharmacogenomics J       Date:  2014-10-28       Impact factor: 3.550

7.  Potential Role of Genomic Sequencing in the Early Diagnosis of Treatable Genetic Conditions.

Authors:  Hengameh Zahed; Teresa N Sparks; Ben Li; Adnan Alsadah; Joseph T C Shieh
Journal:  J Pediatr       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 4.406

8.  A framework for analyzing the ethics of disclosing genetic research findings.

Authors:  Lisa Eckstein; Jeremy R Garrett; Benjamin E Berkman
Journal:  J Law Med Ethics       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 1.718

9.  Adolescents' and Parents' Genomic Testing Decisions: Associations With Age, Race, and Sex.

Authors:  Melanie F Myers; Lisa J Martin; Cynthia A Prows
Journal:  J Adolesc Health       Date:  2019-11-01       Impact factor: 5.012

10.  Whole-exome sequencing in pediatrics: parents' considerations toward return of unsolicited findings for their child.

Authors:  Candice Cornelis; Aad Tibben; Wybo Dondorp; Mieke van Haelst; Annelien L Bredenoord; Nine Knoers; Marcus Düwell; Ineke Bolt; Marieke van Summeren
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2016-07-27       Impact factor: 4.246

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.