Literature DB >> 19109259

Invited review: reliability of genomic predictions for North American Holstein bulls.

P M VanRaden1, C P Van Tassell, G R Wiggans, T S Sonstegard, R D Schnabel, J F Taylor, F S Schenkel.   

Abstract

Genetic progress will increase when breeders examine genotypes in addition to pedigrees and phenotypes. Genotypes for 38,416 markers and August 2003 genetic evaluations for 3,576 Holstein bulls born before 1999 were used to predict January 2008 daughter deviations for 1,759 bulls born from 1999 through 2002. Genotypes were generated using the Illumina BovineSNP50 BeadChip and DNA from semen contributed by US and Canadian artificial-insemination organizations to the Cooperative Dairy DNA Repository. Genomic predictions for 5 yield traits, 5 fitness traits, 16 conformation traits, and net merit were computed using a linear model with an assumed normal distribution for marker effects and also using a nonlinear model with a heavier tailed prior distribution to account for major genes. The official parent average from 2003 and a 2003 parent average computed from only the subset of genotyped ancestors were combined with genomic predictions using a selection index. Combined predictions were more accurate than official parent averages for all 27 traits. The coefficients of determination (R(2)) were 0.05 to 0.38 greater with nonlinear genomic predictions included compared with those from parent average alone. Linear genomic predictions had R(2) values similar to those from nonlinear predictions but averaged just 0.01 lower. The greatest benefits of genomic prediction were for fat percentage because of a known gene with a large effect. The R(2) values were converted to realized reliabilities by dividing by mean reliability of 2008 daughter deviations and then adding the difference between published and observed reliabilities of 2003 parent averages. When averaged across all traits, combined genomic predictions had realized reliabilities that were 23% greater than reliabilities of parent averages (50 vs. 27%), and gains in information were equivalent to 11 additional daughter records. Reliability increased more by doubling the number of bulls genotyped than the number of markers genotyped. Genomic prediction improves reliability by tracing the inheritance of genes even with small effects.

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19109259     DOI: 10.3168/jds.2008-1514

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Dairy Sci        ISSN: 0022-0302            Impact factor:   4.034


  326 in total

1.  Genetic variances of SNP loci for milk yield in dairy cattle.

Authors:  Petr Pešek; Josef Přibyl; Luboš Vostrý
Journal:  J Appl Genet       Date:  2014-11-16       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  The impact of genetic architecture on genome-wide evaluation methods.

Authors:  Hans D Daetwyler; Ricardo Pong-Wong; Beatriz Villanueva; John A Woolliams
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2010-04-20       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  A two-stage approximation for analysis of mixture genetic models in large pedigrees.

Authors:  D Habier; L R Totir; R L Fernando
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2010-04-09       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  Accurate prediction of genetic values for complex traits by whole-genome resequencing.

Authors:  Theo Meuwissen; Mike Goddard
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2010-03-22       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  Integrating Nonadditive Genomic Relationship Matrices into the Study of Genetic Architecture of Complex Traits.

Authors:  Alireza Nazarian; Salvador A Gezan
Journal:  J Hered       Date:  2015-12-27       Impact factor: 2.645

6.  Genomic selection in a commercial winter wheat population.

Authors:  Sang He; Albert Wilhelm Schulthess; Vilson Mirdita; Yusheng Zhao; Viktor Korzun; Reiner Bothe; Erhard Ebmeyer; Jochen C Reif; Yong Jiang
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2016-01-08       Impact factor: 5.699

7.  Predictive ability of subsets of single nucleotide polymorphisms with and without parent average in US Holsteins.

Authors:  A I Vazquez; G J M Rosa; K A Weigel; G de los Campos; D Gianola; D B Allison
Journal:  J Dairy Sci       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 4.034

8.  Development and validation of a small SNP panel for feed efficiency in beef cattle.

Authors:  M K Abo-Ismail; N Lansink; E Akanno; B K Karisa; J J Crowley; S S Moore; E Bork; P Stothard; J A Basarab; G S Plastow
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2018-03-06       Impact factor: 3.159

9.  Factors affecting accuracy from genomic selection in populations derived from multiple inbred lines: a Barley case study.

Authors:  Shengqiang Zhong; Jack C M Dekkers; Rohan L Fernando; Jean-Luc Jannink
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2009-03-18       Impact factor: 4.562

10.  Diversity and evolution of 11 innate immune genes in Bos taurus taurus and Bos taurus indicus cattle.

Authors:  Christopher M Seabury; Paul M Seabury; Jared E Decker; Robert D Schnabel; Jeremy F Taylor; James E Womack
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-12-14       Impact factor: 11.205

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.