Literature DB >> 19762843

Predictive ability of direct genomic values for lifetime net merit of Holstein sires using selected subsets of single nucleotide polymorphism markers.

K A Weigel1, G de los Campos, O González-Recio, H Naya, X L Wu, N Long, G J M Rosa, D Gianola.   

Abstract

The objective of the present study was to assess the predictive ability of subsets of single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) markers for development of low-cost, low-density genotyping assays in dairy cattle. Dense SNP genotypes of 4,703 Holstein bulls were provided by the USDA Agricultural Research Service. A subset of 3,305 bulls born from 1952 to 1998 was used to fit various models (training set), and a subset of 1,398 bulls born from 1999 to 2002 was used to evaluate their predictive ability (testing set). After editing, data included genotypes for 32,518 SNP and August 2003 and April 2008 predicted transmitting abilities (PTA) for lifetime net merit (LNM$), the latter resulting from progeny testing. The Bayesian least absolute shrinkage and selection operator method was used to regress August 2003 PTA on marker covariates in the training set to arrive at estimates of marker effects and direct genomic PTA. The coefficient of determination (R(2)) from regressing the April 2008 progeny test PTA of bulls in the testing set on their August 2003 direct genomic PTA was 0.375. Subsets of 300, 500, 750, 1,000, 1,250, 1,500, and 2,000 SNP were created by choosing equally spaced and highly ranked SNP, with the latter based on the absolute value of their estimated effects obtained from the training set. The SNP effects were re-estimated from the training set for each subset of SNP, and the 2008 progeny test PTA of bulls in the testing set were regressed on corresponding direct genomic PTA. The R(2) values for subsets of 300, 500, 750, 1,000, 1,250, 1,500, and 2,000 SNP with largest effects (evenly spaced SNP) were 0.184 (0.064), 0.236 (0.111), 0.269 (0.190), 0.289 (0.179), 0.307 (0.228), 0.313 (0.268), and 0.322 (0.291), respectively. These results indicate that a low-density assay comprising selected SNP could be a cost-effective alternative for selection decisions and that significant gains in predictive ability may be achieved by increasing the number of SNP allocated to such an assay from 300 or fewer to 1,000 or more.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19762843     DOI: 10.3168/jds.2009-2092

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Dairy Sci        ISSN: 0022-0302            Impact factor:   4.034


  37 in total

1.  Predictive ability of subsets of single nucleotide polymorphisms with and without parent average in US Holsteins.

Authors:  A I Vazquez; G J M Rosa; K A Weigel; G de los Campos; D Gianola; D B Allison
Journal:  J Dairy Sci       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 4.034

Review 2.  Predicting genetic predisposition in humans: the promise of whole-genome markers.

Authors:  Gustavo de los Campos; Daniel Gianola; David B Allison
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2010-11-03       Impact factor: 53.242

3.  Bayesian inference of genetic parameters based on conditional decompositions of multivariate normal distributions.

Authors:  Jon Hallander; Patrik Waldmann; Chunkao Wang; Mikko J Sillanpää
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2010-03-29       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  Application of support vector regression to genome-assisted prediction of quantitative traits.

Authors:  Nanye Long; Daniel Gianola; Guilherme J M Rosa; Kent A Weigel
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2011-07-08       Impact factor: 5.699

5.  The Causal Meaning of Genomic Predictors and How It Affects Construction and Comparison of Genome-Enabled Selection Models.

Authors:  Bruno D Valente; Gota Morota; Francisco Peñagaricano; Daniel Gianola; Kent Weigel; Guilherme J M Rosa
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2015-04-23       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  Priors in whole-genome regression: the bayesian alphabet returns.

Authors:  Daniel Gianola
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2013-05-01       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  Genomic-Enabled Prediction Based on Molecular Markers and Pedigree Using the Bayesian Linear Regression Package in R.

Authors:  Paulino Pérez; Gustavo de Los Campos; José Crossa; Daniel Gianola
Journal:  Plant Genome       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 4.089

8.  Comparing strategies for selection of low-density SNPs for imputation-mediated genomic prediction in U. S. Holsteins.

Authors:  Jun He; Jiaqi Xu; Xiao-Lin Wu; Stewart Bauck; Jungjae Lee; Gota Morota; Stephen D Kachman; Matthew L Spangler
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  2017-12-14       Impact factor: 1.082

9.  Accuracy of direct genomic values in Holstein bulls and cows using subsets of SNP markers.

Authors:  Gerhard Moser; Mehar S Khatkar; Ben J Hayes; Herman W Raadsma
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2010-10-16       Impact factor: 4.297

10.  Deregressing estimated breeding values and weighting information for genomic regression analyses.

Authors:  Dorian J Garrick; Jeremy F Taylor; Rohan L Fernando
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2009-12-31       Impact factor: 4.297

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.