Literature DB >> 26712858

Integrating Nonadditive Genomic Relationship Matrices into the Study of Genetic Architecture of Complex Traits.

Alireza Nazarian1, Salvador A Gezan2.   

Abstract

The study of genetic architecture of complex traits has been dramatically influenced by implementing genome-wide analytical approaches during recent years. Of particular interest are genomic prediction strategies which make use of genomic information for predicting phenotypic responses instead of detecting trait-associated loci. In this work, we present the results of a simulation study to improve our understanding of the statistical properties of estimation of genetic variance components of complex traits, and of additive, dominance, and genetic effects through best linear unbiased prediction methodology. Simulated dense marker information was used to construct genomic additive and dominance matrices, and multiple alternative pedigree- and marker-based models were compared to determine if including a dominance term into the analysis may improve the genetic analysis of complex traits. Our results showed that a model containing a pedigree- or marker-based additive relationship matrix along with a pedigree-based dominance matrix provided the best partitioning of genetic variance into its components, especially when some degree of true dominance effects was expected to exist. Also, we noted that the use of a marker-based additive relationship matrix along with a pedigree-based dominance matrix had the best performance in terms of accuracy of correlations between true and estimated additive, dominance, and genetic effects. © The American Genetic Association 2015. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Keywords:  G-BLUP; P-BLUP; complex traits; dominance effects; dominance relationship matrix; genomic prediction

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26712858      PMCID: PMC4892418          DOI: 10.1093/jhered/esv096

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Hered        ISSN: 0022-1503            Impact factor:   2.645


  36 in total

1.  An ecologist's guide to the animal model.

Authors:  Alastair J Wilson; Denis Réale; Michelle N Clements; Michael M Morrissey; Erik Postma; Craig A Walling; Loeske E B Kruuk; Daniel H Nussey
Journal:  J Anim Ecol       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 5.091

Review 2.  Estimation of quantitative genetic parameters.

Authors:  Robin Thompson
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2008-03-22       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Increased accuracy of artificial selection by using the realized relationship matrix.

Authors:  B J Hayes; P M Visscher; M E Goddard
Journal:  Genet Res (Camb)       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 1.588

4.  Efficient methods to compute genomic predictions.

Authors:  P M VanRaden
Journal:  J Dairy Sci       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 4.034

5.  On the additive and dominant variance and covariance of individuals within the genomic selection scope.

Authors:  Zulma G Vitezica; Luis Varona; Andres Legarra
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2013-10-11       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  Unraveling additive from nonadditive effects using genomic relationship matrices.

Authors:  Patricio R Muñoz; Marcio F R Resende; Salvador A Gezan; Marcos Deon Vilela Resende; Gustavo de Los Campos; Matias Kirst; Dudley Huber; Gary F Peter
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2014-10-15       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  Journal of heredity adopts joint data archiving policy.

Authors:  C Scott Baker
Journal:  J Hered       Date:  2013 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.645

8.  Prediction of genetic values of quantitative traits in plant breeding using pedigree and molecular markers.

Authors:  José Crossa; Gustavo de Los Campos; Paulino Pérez; Daniel Gianola; Juan Burgueño; José Luis Araus; Dan Makumbi; Ravi P Singh; Susanne Dreisigacker; Jianbing Yan; Vivi Arief; Marianne Banziger; Hans-Joachim Braun
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2010-09-02       Impact factor: 4.562

9.  Common SNPs explain a large proportion of the heritability for human height.

Authors:  Jian Yang; Beben Benyamin; Brian P McEvoy; Scott Gordon; Anjali K Henders; Dale R Nyholt; Pamela A Madden; Andrew C Heath; Nicholas G Martin; Grant W Montgomery; Michael E Goddard; Peter M Visscher
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2010-06-20       Impact factor: 38.330

10.  Genomic prediction when some animals are not genotyped.

Authors:  Ole F Christensen; Mogens S Lund
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2010-01-27       Impact factor: 4.297

View more
  6 in total

1.  GenoMatrix: A Software Package for Pedigree-Based and Genomic Prediction Analyses on Complex Traits.

Authors:  Alireza Nazarian; Salvador Alejandro Gezan
Journal:  J Hered       Date:  2016-03-29       Impact factor: 2.645

2.  Evaluation of the Genetic Variance of Alzheimer's Disease Explained by the Disease-Associated Chromosomal Regions.

Authors:  Alireza Nazarian; Alexander M Kulminski
Journal:  J Alzheimers Dis       Date:  2019       Impact factor: 4.472

3.  Improving accuracies of genomic predictions for drought tolerance in maize by joint modeling of additive and dominance effects in multi-environment trials.

Authors:  Kaio Olímpio Das Graças Dias; Salvador Alejandro Gezan; Claudia Teixeira Guimarães; Alireza Nazarian; Luciano da Costa E Silva; Sidney Netto Parentoni; Paulo Evaristo de Oliveira Guimarães; Carina de Oliveira Anoni; José Maria Villela Pádua; Marcos de Oliveira Pinto; Roberto Willians Noda; Carlos Alexandre Gomes Ribeiro; Jurandir Vieira de Magalhães; Antonio Augusto Franco Garcia; João Cândido de Souza; Lauro José Moreira Guimarães; Maria Marta Pastina
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2018-02-23       Impact factor: 3.821

4.  Exploration of genetic architecture through sib-ship reconstruction in advanced breeding population of Eucalyptus nitens.

Authors:  Jaroslav Klápště; Mari Suontama; Emily Telfer; Natalie Graham; Charlie Low; Toby Stovold; Russel McKinley; Heidi Dungey
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-09-22       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Genomic Predictions With Nonadditive Effects Improved Estimates of Additive Effects and Predictions of Total Genetic Values in Pinus sylvestris.

Authors:  Ainhoa Calleja-Rodriguez; ZhiQiang Chen; Mari Suontama; Jin Pan; Harry X Wu
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2021-07-07       Impact factor: 5.753

6.  Genomic heritability estimates in sweet cherry reveal non-additive genetic variance is relevant for industry-prioritized traits.

Authors:  Julia Piaskowski; Craig Hardner; Lichun Cai; Yunyang Zhao; Amy Iezzoni; Cameron Peace
Journal:  BMC Genet       Date:  2018-04-10       Impact factor: 2.797

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.