Literature DB >> 20679695

A model-constrained Monte Carlo method for blind arterial input function estimation in dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI: II. In vivo results.

Matthias C Schabel1, Edward V R DiBella, Randy L Jensen, Karen L Salzman.   

Abstract

Accurate quantification of pharmacokinetic model parameters in tracer kinetic imaging experiments requires correspondingly accurate determination of the arterial input function (AIF). Despite significant effort expended on methods of directly measuring patient-specific AIFs in modalities as diverse as dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI), dynamic positron emission tomography (PET), and perfusion computed tomography (CT), fundamental and technical difficulties have made consistent and reliable achievement of that goal elusive. Here, we validate a new algorithm for AIF determination, the Monte Carlo blind estimation (MCBE) method (which is described in detail and characterized by extensive simulations in a companion paper), by comparing AIFs measured in DCE-MRI studies of eight brain tumor patients with results of blind estimation. Blind AIFs calculated with the MCBE method using a pool of concentration-time curves from a region of normal brain tissue were found to be quite similar to the measured AIFs, with statistically significant decreases in fit residuals observed in six of eight patients. Biases between the blind and measured pharmacokinetic parameters were the dominant source of error. Averaged over all eight patients, the mean biases were +7% in K(trans), 0% in k(ep), -11% in v(p) and +10% in v(e). Corresponding uncertainties (median absolute deviation from the best fit line) were 0.0043 min(-1) in K(trans), 0.0491 min(-1) in k(ep), 0.29% in v(p) and 0.45% in v(e). The use of a published population-averaged AIF resulted in larger mean biases in three of the four parameters (-23% in K(trans), -22% in k(ep), -63% in v(p)), with the bias in v(e) unchanged, and led to larger uncertainties in all four parameters (0.0083 min(-1) in K(trans), 0.1038 min(-1) in k(ep), 0.31% in v(p) and 0.95% in v(e)). When blind AIFs were calculated from a region of tumor tissue, statistically significant decreases in fit residuals were observed in all eight patients despite larger deviations of these blind AIFs from the measured AIFs. The observed decrease in root-mean-square fit residuals between the normal brain and tumor tissue blind AIFs suggests that the local blood supply in tumors is measurably different from that in normal brain tissue and that the proposed method is able to discriminate between the two. We have shown the feasibility of applying the MCBE algorithm to DCE-MRI data acquired in brain, finding generally good agreement with measured AIFs and decreased biases and uncertainties relative to the use of a population-averaged AIF. These results demonstrate that the MCBE algorithm is a useful alternative to direct AIF measurement in cases where acquisition of high-quality arterial input function data is difficult or impossible.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20679695      PMCID: PMC3533373          DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/55/16/012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  27 in total

1.  A distributed parameter model of cerebral blood-tissue exchange with account of capillary transit time distribution.

Authors:  T S Koh; L H Dennis Cheong; C K Markus Tan; C C Tchoyoson Lim
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2005-10-24       Impact factor: 6.556

2.  Comparison of a reference region model with direct measurement of an AIF in the analysis of DCE-MRI data.

Authors:  Thomas E Yankeelov; Greg O Cron; Christina L Addison; Julia C Wallace; Ruth C Wilkins; Bruce A Pappas; Giles E Santyr; John C Gore
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 4.668

3.  Reexamining the quantification of perfusion MRI data in the presence of bolus dispersion.

Authors:  Linda Ko; Marina Salluzzi; Richard Frayne; Michael Smith
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 4.813

4.  Bayesian estimation of pharmacokinetic parameters for DCE-MRI with a robust treatment of enhancement onset time.

Authors:  Matthew R Orton; David J Collins; Simon Walker-Samuel; James A d'Arcy; David J Hawkes; David Atkinson; Martin O Leach
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2007-04-10       Impact factor: 3.609

5.  T1 measurement of flowing blood and arterial input function determination for quantitative 3D T1-weighted DCE-MRI.

Authors:  Hai-Ling Margaret Cheng
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 4.813

6.  Uncertainty in T(1) mapping using the variable flip angle method with two flip angles.

Authors:  Matthias C Schabel; Glen R Morrell
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2008-12-05       Impact factor: 3.609

7.  Uncertainty and bias in contrast concentration measurements using spoiled gradient echo pulse sequences.

Authors:  Matthias C Schabel; Dennis L Parker
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2008-04-17       Impact factor: 3.609

8.  Reproducibility of reference tissue quantification of dynamic contrast-enhanced data: comparison with a fixed vascular input function.

Authors:  S Walker-Samuel; C C Parker; M O Leach; D J Collins
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2006-12-06       Impact factor: 3.609

9.  Bolus delay and dispersion in perfusion MRI: implications for tissue predictor models in stroke.

Authors:  Fernando Calamante; Lisa Willats; David G Gadian; Alan Connelly
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 4.668

10.  Experimentally-derived functional form for a population-averaged high-temporal-resolution arterial input function for dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI.

Authors:  Geoff J M Parker; Caleb Roberts; Andrew Macdonald; Giovanni A Buonaccorsi; Sue Cheung; David L Buckley; Alan Jackson; Yvonne Watson; Karen Davies; Gordon C Jayson
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 4.668

View more
  12 in total

1.  Mapping of low flip angles in magnetic resonance.

Authors:  Fabien Balezeau; Pierre-Antoine Eliat; Alejandro Bordelois Cayamo; Hervé Saint-Jalmes
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2011-09-23       Impact factor: 3.609

2.  Response-Derived Input Function Estimation for Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI Demonstrated by Anti-DLL4 Treatment in a Murine U87 Xenograft Model.

Authors:  Matthew D Silva; Brittany Yerby; Jodi Moriguchi; Albert Gomez; H Toni Jun; Angela Coxon; Sharon E Ungersma
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 3.488

3.  Comparison of arterial input functions measured from ultra-fast dynamic contrast enhanced MRI and dynamic contrast enhanced computed tomography in prostate cancer patients.

Authors:  Shiyang Wang; Zhengfeng Lu; Xiaobing Fan; Milica Medved; Xia Jiang; Steffen Sammet; Ambereen Yousuf; Federico Pineda; Aytekin Oto; Gregory S Karczmar
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2018-01-30       Impact factor: 3.609

4.  A model-constrained Monte Carlo method for blind arterial input function estimation in dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI: I. Simulations.

Authors:  Matthias C Schabel; Jacob U Fluckiger; Edward V R DiBella
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2010-08-03       Impact factor: 3.609

5.  Correction of arterial input function in dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI of the liver.

Authors:  Hesheng Wang; Yue Cao
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2012-03-05       Impact factor: 4.813

6.  Assessment of DCE-MRI parameters for brain tumors through implementation of physiologically-based pharmacokinetic model approaches for Gd-DOTA.

Authors:  Marios Spanakis; Eleftherios Kontopodis; Sophie Van Cauter; Vangelis Sakkalis; Kostas Marias
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn       Date:  2016-09-19       Impact factor: 2.745

7.  Quinacrine synergistically enhances the antivascular and antitumor efficacy of cediranib in intracranial mouse glioma.

Authors:  Merryl R Lobo; Sarah C Green; Matthias C Schabel; G Yancey Gillespie; Randall L Woltjer; Martin M Pike
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2013-10-03       Impact factor: 12.300

8.  Imaging vascular function for early stage clinical trials using dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  M O Leach; B Morgan; P S Tofts; D L Buckley; W Huang; M A Horsfield; T L Chenevert; D J Collins; A Jackson; D Lomas; B Whitcher; L Clarke; R Plummer; I Judson; R Jones; R Alonzi; T Brunner; D M Koh; P Murphy; J C Waterton; G Parker; M J Graves; T W J Scheenen; T W Redpath; M Orton; G Karczmar; H Huisman; J Barentsz; A Padhani
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2012-05-07       Impact factor: 5.315

9.  Preoperative dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI correlates with molecular markers of hypoxia and vascularity in specific areas of intratumoral microenvironment and is predictive of patient outcome.

Authors:  Randy L Jensen; Michael L Mumert; David L Gillespie; Anita Y Kinney; Matthias C Schabel; Karen L Salzman
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2013-12-04       Impact factor: 12.300

10.  Patient-specific pharmacokinetic parameter estimation on dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI of prostate: Preliminary evaluation of a novel AIF-free estimation method.

Authors:  Shoshana B Ginsburg; Pekka Taimen; Harri Merisaari; Paula Vainio; Peter J Boström; Hannu J Aronen; Ivan Jambor; Anant Madabhushi
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2016-06-10       Impact factor: 5.119

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.