Literature DB >> 20679691

A model-constrained Monte Carlo method for blind arterial input function estimation in dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI: I. Simulations.

Matthias C Schabel1, Jacob U Fluckiger, Edward V R DiBella.   

Abstract

Widespread adoption of quantitative pharmacokinetic modeling methods in conjunction with dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) has led to increased recognition of the importance of obtaining accurate patient-specific arterial input function (AIF) measurements. Ideally, DCE-MRI studies use an AIF directly measured in an artery local to the tissue of interest, along with measured tissue concentration curves, to quantitatively determine pharmacokinetic parameters. However, the numerous technical and practical difficulties associated with AIF measurement have made the use of population-averaged AIF data a popular, if sub-optimal, alternative to AIF measurement. In this work, we present and characterize a new algorithm for determining the AIF solely from the measured tissue concentration curves. This Monte Carlo blind estimation (MCBE) algorithm estimates the AIF from the subsets of D concentration-time curves drawn from a larger pool of M candidate curves via nonlinear optimization, doing so for multiple (Q) subsets and statistically averaging these repeated estimates. The MCBE algorithm can be viewed as a generalization of previously published methods that employ clustering of concentration-time curves and only estimate the AIF once. Extensive computer simulations were performed over physiologically and experimentally realistic ranges of imaging and tissue parameters, and the impact of choosing different values of D and Q was investigated. We found the algorithm to be robust, computationally efficient and capable of accurately estimating the AIF even for relatively high noise levels, long sampling intervals and low diversity of tissue curves. With the incorporation of bootstrapping initialization, we further demonstrated the ability to blindly estimate AIFs that deviate substantially in shape from the population-averaged initial guess. Pharmacokinetic parameter estimates for K(trans), k(ep), v(p) and v(e) all showed relative biases and uncertainties of less than 10% for measurements having a temporal sampling rate of 4 s and a concentration measurement noise level of sigma = 0.04 mM. A companion paper discusses the application of the MCBE algorithm to DCE-MRI data acquired in eight patients with malignant brain tumors.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20679691      PMCID: PMC3533367          DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/55/16/011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  54 in total

1.  Reexamining the quantification of perfusion MRI data in the presence of bolus dispersion.

Authors:  Linda Ko; Marina Salluzzi; Richard Frayne; Michael Smith
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 4.813

2.  Quantitative myocardial distribution volume from dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI.

Authors:  Nathan A Pack; Edward V R Dibella; Brent D Wilson; Christopher J McGann
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2008-02-20       Impact factor: 2.546

3.  T1 measurement of flowing blood and arterial input function determination for quantitative 3D T1-weighted DCE-MRI.

Authors:  Hai-Ling Margaret Cheng
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 4.813

4.  Uncertainty and bias in contrast concentration measurements using spoiled gradient echo pulse sequences.

Authors:  Matthias C Schabel; Dennis L Parker
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2008-04-17       Impact factor: 3.609

5.  AG-013736, a novel inhibitor of VEGF receptor tyrosine kinases, inhibits breast cancer growth and decreases vascular permeability as detected by dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Lisa J Wilmes; Maria G Pallavicini; Lisa M Fleming; Jessica Gibbs; Donghui Wang; Ka-Loh Li; Savannah C Partridge; Roland G Henry; David R Shalinsky; Dana Hu-Lowe; John W Park; Teresa M McShane; Ying Lu; Robert C Brasch; Nola M Hylton
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2007-02-05       Impact factor: 2.546

6.  Multiphasic contrast injection for improved precision of parameter estimates in functional CT.

Authors:  S M Kim; Y B Cho; M A Haider; M Milosevic; I W T Yeung
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 4.071

Review 7.  Stress perfusion magnetic resonance imaging of the heart.

Authors:  Michael Jerosch-Herold; Olaf Muehling
Journal:  Top Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2008-02

8.  Multiple reference tissue method for contrast agent arterial input function estimation.

Authors:  Cheng Yang; Gregory S Karczmar; Milica Medved; Walter M Stadler
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 4.668

9.  Investigation and optimization of parameter accuracy in dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI.

Authors:  Hai-Ling Margaret Cheng
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 4.813

10.  Pharmacokinetic modeling of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI of the hand and wrist in rheumatoid arthritis and the response to anti-tumor necrosis factor-alpha therapy.

Authors:  Richard J Hodgson; Sylvia Connolly; Theresa Barnes; Brian Eyes; Robert S D Campbell; Robert Moots
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 4.668

View more
  14 in total

1.  Response-Derived Input Function Estimation for Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI Demonstrated by Anti-DLL4 Treatment in a Murine U87 Xenograft Model.

Authors:  Matthew D Silva; Brittany Yerby; Jodi Moriguchi; Albert Gomez; H Toni Jun; Angela Coxon; Sharon E Ungersma
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 3.488

2.  A model-constrained Monte Carlo method for blind arterial input function estimation in dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI: II. In vivo results.

Authors:  Matthias C Schabel; Edward V R DiBella; Randy L Jensen; Karen L Salzman
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2010-08-03       Impact factor: 3.609

3.  Correction of arterial input function in dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI of the liver.

Authors:  Hesheng Wang; Yue Cao
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2012-03-05       Impact factor: 4.813

4.  Discrimination between benign and malignant breast lesions using volumetric quantitative dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging.

Authors:  Ziliang Cheng; Zhuo Wu; Guangzi Shi; Zhilong Yi; Mingwei Xie; Weike Zeng; Chao Song; Chushan Zheng; Jun Shen
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2017-09-19       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI parametric mapping using high spatiotemporal resolution Golden-angle RAdial Sparse Parallel MRI and iterative joint estimation of the arterial input function and pharmacokinetic parameters.

Authors:  Yousef Mazaheri; Nathanael Kim; Yulia Lakhman; Ramin Jafari; Alberto Vargas; Ricardo Otazo
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2022-03-14       Impact factor: 4.478

6.  Quinacrine synergistically enhances the antivascular and antitumor efficacy of cediranib in intracranial mouse glioma.

Authors:  Merryl R Lobo; Sarah C Green; Matthias C Schabel; G Yancey Gillespie; Randall L Woltjer; Martin M Pike
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2013-10-03       Impact factor: 12.300

7.  Relative sensitivities of DCE-MRI pharmacokinetic parameters to arterial input function (AIF) scaling.

Authors:  Xin Li; Yu Cai; Brendan Moloney; Yiyi Chen; Wei Huang; Mark Woods; Fergus V Coakley; William D Rooney; Mark G Garzotto; Charles S Springer
Journal:  J Magn Reson       Date:  2016-05-28       Impact factor: 2.229

8.  A Direct Algorithm for Optimization Problems With the Huber Penalty.

Authors:  Jingyan Xu; Frederic Noo; Benjamin M W Tsui
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2017-10-05       Impact factor: 10.048

Review 9.  Advanced techniques using contrast media in neuroimaging.

Authors:  Jean-Christophe Ferré; Mark S Shiroishi; Meng Law
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am       Date:  2012-09-25       Impact factor: 2.266

10.  Three-dimensional dynamic contrast enhanced imaging of the carotid artery with direct arterial input function measurement.

Authors:  Jason Mendes; Dennis L Parker; Scott McNally; Ed DiBella; Bradley D Bolster; Gerald S Treiman
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2013-12-24       Impact factor: 4.668

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.