Literature DB >> 22392876

Correction of arterial input function in dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI of the liver.

Hesheng Wang1, Yue Cao.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To develop a postprocessing method to correct saturation of arterial input function (AIF) in T1-weighted dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) for quantification of hepatic perfusion.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The saturated AIF is corrected by parameterizing the first pass of the AIF as a smooth function with a single peak and minimizing a least-squares error in fitting the liver DCE-MRI data to a dual-input single-compartment model. Sensitivities of the method to the degree of saturation in the AIF first-pass peak and the image contrast-to-noise ratio were assessed. The method was also evaluated by correlating portal venous perfusion with an independent overall liver function measurement.
RESULTS: The proposed method corrects the distorted AIF with a saturation ratio up to 0.45. The corrected AIF improved hepatic arterial perfusion by -23.4% and portal venous perfusion by 26.9% in a study of 12 patients with liver cancers. The correlation between the mean voxelwise portal venous perfusion and overall liver function measurement was improved by using the corrected AIFs (R(2) = 0.67) compared with the saturated AIFs (R(2) = 0.39).
CONCLUSION: The method is robust for correcting AIF distortion and has the potential to improve quantification of hepatic perfusion for assessment of liver tissue response to treatment in patients with hepatic cancers.
Copyright © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22392876      PMCID: PMC3371299          DOI: 10.1002/jmri.23636

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging        ISSN: 1053-1807            Impact factor:   4.813


  37 in total

1.  Gd-DTPA relaxivity depends on macromolecular content.

Authors:  G J Stanisz; R M Henkelman
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 4.668

2.  Accuracy of deconvolution analysis based on singular value decomposition for quantification of cerebral blood flow using dynamic susceptibility contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  K Murase; M Shinohara; Y Yamazaki
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 3.609

3.  The use of a reference tissue arterial input function with low-temporal-resolution DCE-MRI data.

Authors:  M Heisen; X Fan; J Buurman; N A W van Riel; G S Karczmar; B M ter Haar Romeny
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2010-08-03       Impact factor: 3.609

4.  Differentiating between T1 and T2* changes caused by gadopentetate dimeglumine in the kidney by using a double-echo dynamic MR imaging sequence.

Authors:  V Y Kuperman; G S Karczmar; M J Blomley; M Z Lewis; L M Lubich; M J Lipton
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  1996 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 4.813

5.  Treatment volume and tissue tolerance.

Authors:  H R Withers; J M Taylor; B Maciejewski
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  1988-04       Impact factor: 7.038

6.  A model-constrained Monte Carlo method for blind arterial input function estimation in dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI: I. Simulations.

Authors:  Matthias C Schabel; Jacob U Fluckiger; Edward V R DiBella
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2010-08-03       Impact factor: 3.609

Review 7.  Perfusion magnetic resonance imaging of the liver.

Authors:  Choon Hua Thng; Tong San Koh; David J Collins; Dow Mu Koh
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2010-04-07       Impact factor: 5.742

8.  Probability of radiation-induced complications in normal tissues with parallel architecture under conditions of uniform whole or partial organ irradiation.

Authors:  E D Yorke; G J Kutcher; A Jackson; C C Ling
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 6.280

9.  Studies of Gd-DTPA relaxivity and proton exchange rates in tissue.

Authors:  K M Donahue; D Burstein; W J Manning; M L Gray
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 4.668

10.  Combined T2* and T1 measurements for improved perfusion and permeability studies in high field using dynamic contrast enhancement.

Authors:  Cedric de Bazelaire; Neil M Rofsky; Guillaume Duhamel; Jingbo Zhang; M Dror Michaelson; Daniel George; David C Alsop
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2006-04-01       Impact factor: 5.315

View more
  14 in total

1.  Quantitative hepatic perfusion modeling using DCE-MRI with sequential breathholds.

Authors:  Eric M Bultman; Ethan K Brodsky; Debra E Horng; Pablo Irarrazaval; William R Schelman; Walter F Block; Scott B Reeder
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2013-11-04       Impact factor: 4.813

2.  Comparison of arterial input functions measured from ultra-fast dynamic contrast enhanced MRI and dynamic contrast enhanced computed tomography in prostate cancer patients.

Authors:  Shiyang Wang; Zhengfeng Lu; Xiaobing Fan; Milica Medved; Xia Jiang; Steffen Sammet; Ambereen Yousuf; Federico Pineda; Aytekin Oto; Gregory S Karczmar
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2018-01-30       Impact factor: 3.609

3.  Increase in left liver lobe function after preoperative right portal vein embolisation assessed with gadolinium-EOB-DTPA MRI.

Authors:  Dominik Geisel; Lutz Lüdemann; Thomas Keuchel; Maciej Malinowski; Daniel Seehofer; Martin Stockmann; Bernd Hamm; Bernhard Gebauer; Timm Denecke
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2013-05-08       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Vascular input function correction of inflow enhancement for improved pharmacokinetic modeling of liver DCE-MRI.

Authors:  Jia Ning; Tilman Schubert; Kevin M Johnson; Alejandro Roldán-Alzate; Huijun Chen; Chun Yuan; Scott B Reeder
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2017-11-10       Impact factor: 4.668

Review 5.  Topics on quantitative liver magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Yì Xiáng J Wáng; Xiaoqi Wang; Peng Wu; Yajie Wang; Weibo Chen; Huijun Chen; Jianqi Li
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2019-11

6.  Imaging-based evaluation of liver function: comparison of ⁹⁹mTc-mebrofenin hepatobiliary scintigraphy and Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI.

Authors:  Dominik Geisel; Lutz Lüdemann; Vera Fröling; Maciej Malinowski; Martin Stockmann; Annekathrin Baron; Bernhard Gebauer; Daniel Seehofer; Vikas Prasad; Timm Denecke
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2014-12-02       Impact factor: 5.315

7.  Prediction of liver function by using magnetic resonance-based portal venous perfusion imaging.

Authors:  Yue Cao; Hesheng Wang; Timothy D Johnson; Charlie Pan; Hero Hussain; James M Balter; Daniel Normolle; Edgar Ben-Josef; Randall K Ten Haken; Theodore S Lawrence; Mary Feng
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2012-04-18       Impact factor: 7.038

8.  Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI parametric mapping using high spatiotemporal resolution Golden-angle RAdial Sparse Parallel MRI and iterative joint estimation of the arterial input function and pharmacokinetic parameters.

Authors:  Yousef Mazaheri; Nathanael Kim; Yulia Lakhman; Ramin Jafari; Alberto Vargas; Ricardo Otazo
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2022-03-14       Impact factor: 4.478

9.  DCE-MRI of the liver: reconstruction of the arterial input function using a low dose pre-bolus contrast injection.

Authors:  Guido H Jajamovich; Claudia Calcagno; Hadrien A Dyvorne; Henry Rusinek; Bachir Taouli
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-12-29       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 10.  Quantitative imaging biomarkers alliance (QIBA) recommendations for improved precision of DWI and DCE-MRI derived biomarkers in multicenter oncology trials.

Authors:  Amita Shukla-Dave; Nancy A Obuchowski; Thomas L Chenevert; Sachin Jambawalikar; Lawrence H Schwartz; Dariya Malyarenko; Wei Huang; Susan M Noworolski; Robert J Young; Mark S Shiroishi; Harrison Kim; Catherine Coolens; Hendrik Laue; Caroline Chung; Mark Rosen; Michael Boss; Edward F Jackson
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2018-11-19       Impact factor: 5.119

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.