Matthew D Silva1, Brittany Yerby2, Jodi Moriguchi3, Albert Gomez4, H Toni Jun3, Angela Coxon3, Sharon E Ungersma2. 1. Department of Research Imaging Sciences, Amgen, Inc., Thousand Oaks, CA, 93021, USA. mattsilva.0@gmail.com. 2. Department of Research Imaging Sciences, Amgen, Inc., Thousand Oaks, CA, 93021, USA. 3. Department of Oncology, Amgen, Inc., Thousand Oaks, CA, 93021, USA. 4. Department of Comparative Animal Research, Amgen, Inc., Thousand Oaks, CA, 93021, USA.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE MRI) is an accepted method to evaluate tumor perfusion and permeability and anti-vascular cancer therapies. However, there is no consensus on the vascular input function estimation method, which is critical to kinetic modeling and K trans estimation. This work proposes a response-derived input function (RDIF) estimated from the response of the tumor, modeled as a linear, time-invariant (LTI) system. PROCEDURES: In an LTI system, an unknown input can be estimated from the system response. If applied to DCE MRI, this method would eliminate need of distal image-derived inputs, model inputs, or reference regions. The RDIF method first determines each tumor pixel's best-fit input function, and then combines the individual fits into a single input function for the entire tumor. The method was tested with simulations and a xenograft study with anti-vascular drug treatment. RESULTS: Simulations showed successful estimation of input function expected values and good performance in the presence of noise. In vivo, significant reductions in K trans and AUC occurred 2 days following anti-delta-like ligand 4 treatment. The in vivo study results yielded K trans consistent with published data in xenograft models. CONCLUSION: The RDIF method for DCE analysis offers an alternative, easy-to-implement method for estimating the input function in tumors. The method assumes that during the DCE experiment, the changes observed by MRI result solely from vascular perfusion and permeability kinetics, and that information can be used to model the input function. Importantly, the method is demonstrated in a murine xenograft study to yield K trans results consistent with literature values and suitable for compound studies.
PURPOSE: Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE MRI) is an accepted method to evaluate tumor perfusion and permeability and anti-vascular cancer therapies. However, there is no consensus on the vascular input function estimation method, which is critical to kinetic modeling and K trans estimation. This work proposes a response-derived input function (RDIF) estimated from the response of the tumor, modeled as a linear, time-invariant (LTI) system. PROCEDURES: In an LTI system, an unknown input can be estimated from the system response. If applied to DCE MRI, this method would eliminate need of distal image-derived inputs, model inputs, or reference regions. The RDIF method first determines each tumor pixel's best-fit input function, and then combines the individual fits into a single input function for the entire tumor. The method was tested with simulations and a xenograft study with anti-vascular drug treatment. RESULTS: Simulations showed successful estimation of input function expected values and good performance in the presence of noise. In vivo, significant reductions in K trans and AUC occurred 2 days following anti-delta-like ligand 4 treatment. The in vivo study results yielded K trans consistent with published data in xenograft models. CONCLUSION: The RDIF method for DCE analysis offers an alternative, easy-to-implement method for estimating the input function in tumors. The method assumes that during the DCE experiment, the changes observed by MRI result solely from vascular perfusion and permeability kinetics, and that information can be used to model the input function. Importantly, the method is demonstrated in a murine xenograft study to yield K trans results consistent with literature values and suitable for compound studies.
Entities:
Keywords:
DLL4; Dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI); Input function; K trans
Authors: James P B O'Connor; Alan Jackson; Geoff J M Parker; Caleb Roberts; Gordon C Jayson Journal: Nat Rev Clin Oncol Date: 2012-02-14 Impact factor: 66.675
Authors: Thomas E Yankeelov; Jeffrey J Luci; Martin Lepage; Rui Li; Laura Debusk; P Charles Lin; Ronald R Price; John C Gore Journal: Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2005-05 Impact factor: 2.546
Authors: Herbert Hurwitz; Louis Fehrenbacher; William Novotny; Thomas Cartwright; John Hainsworth; William Heim; Jordan Berlin; Ari Baron; Susan Griffing; Eric Holmgren; Napoleone Ferrara; Gwen Fyfe; Beth Rogers; Robert Ross; Fairooz Kabbinavar Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2004-06-03 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Rakesh K Jain; Dan G Duda; Christopher G Willett; Dushyant V Sahani; Andrew X Zhu; Jay S Loeffler; Tracy T Batchelor; A Gregory Sorensen Journal: Nat Rev Clin Oncol Date: 2009-06 Impact factor: 66.675
Authors: Caterina Brighi; Lee Reid; Laura A Genovesi; Marija Kojic; Amanda Millar; Zara Bruce; Alison L White; Bryan W Day; Stephen Rose; Andrew K Whittaker; Simon Puttick Journal: Theranostics Date: 2020-05-15 Impact factor: 11.556