Literature DB >> 18421121

Uncertainty and bias in contrast concentration measurements using spoiled gradient echo pulse sequences.

Matthias C Schabel1, Dennis L Parker.   

Abstract

Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) is a widely used technique for assessing tissue physiology. Spoiled gradient echo (SPGR) pulse sequences are one of the most common methods for acquisition of DCE-MRI data, providing high temporal and spatial resolution with strong T(1)-weighting. Conversion of SPGR signal to concentration is briefly reviewed, and a new closed-form expression for concentration measurement uncertainty for finite signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and baseline scan time is derived. This result is applicable to arbitrary concentration-dependent relaxation rate and is valid over the same domain as the theoretical SPGR signal equation. Expressions for the lower and upper bounds on measurable concentration are also derived. The existence of a concentration- and tissue-dependent optimal flip angle that minimizes concentration uncertainty is demonstrated and it is shown that, for clinically relevant pulse sequence parameters, this optimal flip angle is significantly larger than the corresponding Ernst angle. Analysis of three pulse sequences from the DCE-MRI literature shows that optimization of flip angle using the methods discussed here leads to potential improvements of 10-1166% in effective SNR over the 0.5-5.0 mM concentration range with minimal or no loss of measurement accuracy down to 0.1 mM. In vivo data from three study patients provide further support for our theoretical expression for concentration measurement uncertainty, with predicted and experimental estimates agreeing to within +/- 30%. Equations for concentration bias resulting from biases in flip angle and from pre-contrast relaxation time and contrast relaxivity (both longitudinal and transverse) are also derived in closed-form. The resulting equations show the potential for significant contributions to bias in concentration measurement arising from even relatively small mis-specification of flip angle and/or pre-contrast longitudinal relaxation time, particularly at high contrast concentrations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18421121      PMCID: PMC2894639          DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/53/9/010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  31 in total

1.  Gd-DTPA relaxivity depends on macromolecular content.

Authors:  G J Stanisz; R M Henkelman
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 4.668

2.  Uncertainty in the analysis of tracer kinetics using dynamic contrast-enhanced T1-weighted MRI.

Authors:  David L Buckley
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 4.668

3.  Physiological noise in oxygenation-sensitive magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  G Krüger; G H Glover
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 4.668

4.  Rapid combined T1 and T2 mapping using gradient recalled acquisition in the steady state.

Authors:  Sean C L Deoni; Brian K Rutt; Terry M Peters
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 4.668

5.  Determining and optimizing the precision of quantitative measurements of perfusion from dynamic contrast enhanced MRI.

Authors:  Brian M Dale; John A Jesberger; Jonathan S Lewin; Claudia M Hillenbrand; Jeffrey L Duerk
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 4.813

6.  Effect of magnetic field gradients induced by microvasculature on NMR measurements of molecular self-diffusion in biological tissues.

Authors:  V G Kiselev
Journal:  J Magn Reson       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 2.229

7.  Signal-to-noise efficiency in magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  D L Parker; G T Gullberg
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1990 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 4.071

8.  Rapid calculation of T1 using variable flip angle gradient refocused imaging.

Authors:  E K Fram; R J Herfkens; G A Johnson; G H Glover; J P Karis; A Shimakawa; T G Perkins; N J Pelc
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 2.546

9.  Variation of the relaxographic "shutter-speed" for transcytolemmal water exchange affects the CR bolus-tracking curve shape.

Authors:  Thomas E Yankeelov; William D Rooney; Xin Li; Charles S Springer
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 4.668

Review 10.  Assessment of antiangiogenic and antivascular therapeutics using MRI: recommendations for appropriate methodology for clinical trials.

Authors:  M O Leach; K M Brindle; J L Evelhoch; J R Griffiths; M R Horsman; A Jackson; G Jayson; I R Judson; M V Knopp; R J Maxwell; D McIntyre; A R Padhani; P Price; R Rathbone; G Rustin; P S Tofts; G M Tozer; W Vennart; J C Waterton; S R Williams; P Workman
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 3.039

View more
  85 in total

1.  Mapping of low flip angles in magnetic resonance.

Authors:  Fabien Balezeau; Pierre-Antoine Eliat; Alejandro Bordelois Cayamo; Hervé Saint-Jalmes
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2011-09-23       Impact factor: 3.609

2.  Development and characterization of a dynamic lesion phantom for the quantitative evaluation of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI.

Authors:  Melanie Freed; Jacco A de Zwart; Prasanna Hariharan; Matthew R Myers; Aldo Badano
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Water exchange-minimizing DCE-MRI protocol to detect changes in tumor vascular parameters: effect of bevacizumab/paclitaxel combination therapy.

Authors:  Wenlian Zhu; Yoshinori Kato; Dmitri Artemov
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2013-06-27       Impact factor: 2.310

4.  Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI, diffusion-weighted MRI and 18F-FDG PET/CT for the prediction of survival in oropharyngeal or hypopharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma treated with chemoradiation.

Authors:  Shu-Hang Ng; Chun-Ta Liao; Chien-Yu Lin; Sheng-Chieh Chan; Yu-Chun Lin; Tzu-Chen Yen; Joseph Tung-Chieh Chang; Sheung-Fat Ko; Kang-Hsing Fan; Hung-Ming Wang; Lan-Yan Yang; Jiun-Jie Wang
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2016-02-24       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  Evaluation of the effect of transcytolemmal water exchange analysis for therapeutic response assessment using DCE-MRI: a comparison study.

Authors:  Chunhao Wang; Ergys Subashi; Xiao Liang; Fang-Fang Yin; Zheng Chang
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2016-06-08       Impact factor: 3.609

6.  Precision analysis of kinetic modelling estimates in dynamic contrast enhanced MRI.

Authors:  Dieter De Naeyer; Yves De Deene; Wim P Ceelen; Patrick Segers; Pascal Verdonck
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2011-01-08       Impact factor: 2.310

7.  A comparison of radial keyhole strategies for high spatial and temporal resolution 4D contrast-enhanced MRI in small animal tumor models.

Authors:  Ergys Subashi; Everett J Moding; Gary P Cofer; James R MacFall; David G Kirsch; Yi Qi; G Allan Johnson
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 4.071

8.  Pixel-by-pixel analysis of DCE-MRI curve shape patterns in knees of active and inactive juvenile idiopathic arthritis patients.

Authors:  Robert Hemke; Cristina Lavini; Charlotte M Nusman; J Merlijn van den Berg; Koert M Dolman; Dieneke Schonenberg-Meinema; Marion A J van Rossum; Taco W Kuijpers; Mario Maas
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2014-04-26       Impact factor: 5.315

9.  Gadolinium Chelate Contrast Material in Pregnancy: Fetal Biodistribution in the Nonhuman Primate.

Authors:  Karen Y Oh; Victoria H J Roberts; Matthias C Schabel; Kevin L Grove; Mark Woods; Antonio E Frias
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2015-03-11       Impact factor: 11.105

10.  Quinacrine synergistically enhances the antivascular and antitumor efficacy of cediranib in intracranial mouse glioma.

Authors:  Merryl R Lobo; Sarah C Green; Matthias C Schabel; G Yancey Gillespie; Randall L Woltjer; Martin M Pike
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2013-10-03       Impact factor: 12.300

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.