Literature DB >> 18068931

Quantitative myocardial distribution volume from dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI.

Nathan A Pack1, Edward V R Dibella, Brent D Wilson, Christopher J McGann.   

Abstract

The objective of this study was to investigate if dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) can be used to quantitate the distribution volume (v(e)) in regions of normal and infarcted myocardium. v(e) reflects the volume of the extracellular, extravascular space within the myocardial tissue. In regions of the heart where an infarct has occurred, the loss of viable cardiac cells results in an elevated v(e) compared to normal regions. A quantitative estimate of the magnitude and spatial distribution of v(e) is significant because it may provide information complementary to delayed enhancement MRI alone. Using a hybrid gradient echo-echoplanar imaging pulse sequence on a 1.5T MRI scanner, 12 normal subjects and four infarct patients were imaged dynamically, during the injection of a contrast agent, to measure the regional blood and tissue enhancement in the left ventricular (LV) myocardium. Seven of the normal subjects and all of the infarct patients were also imaged at steady-state contrast enhancement to estimate the steady-state ratio of contrast agent in the tissue and blood (Ct/Cb) - a validated measure of v(e). Normal and infarct regions of the LV were manually selected, and the blood and tissue enhancement curves were fit to a compartment model to estimate v(e). Also, the effect of the vascular blood signal on estimates of v(e) was evaluated using simulations and in the dynamic and steady-state studies. Aggregate estimates of v(e) were 23.6+/-6.3% in normal myocardium and 45.7+/-3.4% in regions of infarct. These results were not significantly different from the reference standards of Ct/Cb (22.9+/-6.8% and 42.6+/-6.3%, P=.073). From the dynamic contrast-enhanced studies, approximately 1 min of scan time was necessary to estimate v(e) in the normal myocardium to within 10% of the steady-state estimate. In regions of infarct, up to 3 min of dynamic data were required to estimate v(e) to within 10% of the steady-state v(e) value. By measuring the kinetics of blood and tissue enhancement in the myocardium during an extended dynamic contrast enhanced MRI study, v(e) may be estimated using compartment modeling.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18068931      PMCID: PMC2383320          DOI: 10.1016/j.mri.2007.10.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging        ISSN: 0730-725X            Impact factor:   2.546


  32 in total

1.  Assessment of myocardial viability with contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging: comparison with positron emission tomography.

Authors:  Christoph Klein; Stephan G Nekolla; Frank M Bengel; Mitsuru Momose; Andrea Sammer; Felix Haas; Bernhard Schnackenburg; Wolfram Delius; Harald Mudra; Dieter Wolfram; Markus Schwaiger
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2002-01-15       Impact factor: 29.690

2.  The influence of myocardial blood flow and volume of distribution on late Gd-DTPA kinetics in ischemic heart failure.

Authors:  Christoph Klein; Stephan G Nekolla; Thomas Balbach; Bernhard Schnackenburg; Eike Nagel; Eckart Fleck; Markus Schwaiger
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 4.813

3.  Myocardial perfusion modeling using MRI.

Authors:  H B Larsson; T Fritz-Hansen; E Rostrup; L Søndergaard; P Ring; O Henriksen
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 4.668

4.  Myocardial viability imaging using Gd-DTPA: physiological modeling of infarcted myocardium, and impact on injection strategy and imaging time.

Authors:  G R Moran; R E Thornhill; J Sykes; F S Prato
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 4.668

5.  Extracellular space and ionic distribution in rat ventricle.

Authors:  P I Polimeni
Journal:  Am J Physiol       Date:  1974-09

6.  Myocardial Gd-DTPA kinetics determine MRI contrast enhancement and reflect the extent and severity of myocardial injury after acute reperfused infarction.

Authors:  R J Kim; E L Chen; J A Lima; R M Judd
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1996-12-15       Impact factor: 29.690

7.  Determination of regional blood volume and intra-extracapillary water exchange in human myocardium using Feruglose: First clinical results in patients with coronary artery disease.

Authors:  Christian M Wacker; Frank Wiesmann; Michael Bock; Peter Jakob; Jörn J W Sandstede; Anja Lehning; Georg Ertl; Lothar R Schad; Axel Haase; Wolfgang R Bauer
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 4.668

8.  Regional heterogeneity of human myocardial infarcts demonstrated by contrast-enhanced MRI. Potential mechanisms.

Authors:  J A Lima; R M Judd; A Bazille; S P Schulman; E Atalar; E A Zerhouni
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1995-09-01       Impact factor: 29.690

9.  Evaluation of heart perfusion in patients with acute myocardial infarction using dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Gitte Nielsen; Thomas Fritz-Hansen; Christina G Dirks; Gorm B Jensen; Henrik B W Larsson
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 4.813

10.  Gadolinium delayed enhancement cardiovascular magnetic resonance correlates with clinical measures of myocardial infarction.

Authors:  W Patricia Ingkanisorn; Kenneth L Rhoads; Anthony H Aletras; Peter Kellman; Andrew E Arai
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2004-06-16       Impact factor: 24.094

View more
  10 in total

1.  A model-constrained Monte Carlo method for blind arterial input function estimation in dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI: I. Simulations.

Authors:  Matthias C Schabel; Jacob U Fluckiger; Edward V R DiBella
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2010-08-03       Impact factor: 3.609

2.  Extracellular remodeling in patients with wild-type amyloidosis consuming epigallocatechin-3-gallate: preliminary results of T1 mapping by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in a small single center study.

Authors:  Fabian aus dem Siepen; Sebastian J Buss; Florian Andre; Sebastian Seitz; Evangelos Giannitsis; Henning Steen; Hugo A Katus; Arnt V Kristen
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2015-02-18       Impact factor: 5.460

3.  Comparison of myocardial perfusion estimates from dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging with four quantitative analysis methods.

Authors:  Nathan A Pack; Edward V R DiBella
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 4.668

4.  Quantification of diffuse myocardial fibrosis and its association with myocardial dysfunction in congenital heart disease.

Authors:  Craig S Broberg; Sumeet S Chugh; Catherine Conklin; David J Sahn; Michael Jerosch-Herold
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2010-09-20       Impact factor: 7.792

5.  Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging of myocardial contrast uptake and blood flow in patients affected with idiopathic or familial dilated cardiomyopathy.

Authors:  Michael Jerosch-Herold; David C Sheridan; Jessica D Kushner; Deirdre Nauman; Donna Burgess; Diana Dutton; Rami Alharethi; Duanxiang Li; Ray E Hershberger
Journal:  Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol       Date:  2008-07-25       Impact factor: 4.733

6.  Mapping contrast agent uptake and retention in MRI studies of myocardial perfusion: case control study of dogs with Duchenne muscular dystrophy.

Authors:  William S Kerwin; Anna Naumova; Rainer Storb; Stephen J Tapscott; Zejing Wang
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2012-10-17       Impact factor: 2.357

7.  Estimating extraction fraction and blood flow by combining first-pass myocardial perfusion and T1 mapping results.

Authors:  Devavrat Likhite; Promporn Suksaranjit; Ganesh Adluru; Brent Wilson; Edward DiBella
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2017-10

8.  Myocardial first-pass perfusion imaging with hybrid-EPI: frequency-offsets and potential artefacts.

Authors:  Pedro F Ferreira; Peter D Gatehouse; David N Firmin
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2012-06-25       Impact factor: 5.364

9.  Estimating myocardial perfusion from dynamic contrast-enhanced CMR with a model-independent deconvolution method.

Authors:  Nathan A Pack; Edward V R DiBella; Thomas C Rust; Dan J Kadrmas; Christopher J McGann; Regan Butterfield; Paul E Christian; John M Hoffman
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2008-11-12       Impact factor: 5.364

10.  Diagnostic Performance of Fully Automated Pixel-Wise Quantitative Myocardial Perfusion Imaging by Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance.

Authors:  Li-Yueh Hsu; Matthew Jacobs; Mitchel Benovoy; Allison D Ta; Hannah M Conn; Susanne Winkler; Anders M Greve; Marcus Y Chen; Sujata M Shanbhag; W Patricia Bandettini; Andrew E Arai
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2018-02-14
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.