Literature DB >> 3429728

The sound emission pattern and the acoustical role of the noseleaf in the echolocating bat, Carollia perspicillata.

D J Hartley1, R A Suthers.   

Abstract

Carollia perspicillata (Phyllostomidae) is a frugivorous bat that emits low-intensity, broadband, frequency-modulated echolocation pulses through nostrils surrounded by a noseleaf. The emission pattern of this bat is of interest because the ratio between the nostril spacing and the emitted wavelength varies during the pulse, causing complex interference patterns in the horizontal dimension. Sound pressures around the bat were measured using a movable microphone and were referenced to those at a stationary microphone positioned directly in front of the animal. Interference between the nostrils was confirmed by blocking one nostril, which eliminated sidelobes and minima in the emission pattern, and by comparison of real emission patterns with simple computer models. The positions of minima in the patterns indicate effective nostril spacings of over a half-wavelength. Displacement of the dorsal lancet of the noseleaf demonstrated that this structure directs sound in the vertical dimension.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3429728     DOI: 10.1121/1.395684

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  17 in total

1.  Vespertilionid bats control the width of their biosonar sound beam dynamically during prey pursuit.

Authors:  Lasse Jakobsen; Annemarie Surlykke
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-07-19       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Spatial processing within the mustache bat echolocation system: possible mechanisms for optimization.

Authors:  Z M Fuzessery; D J Hartley; J J Wenstrup
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 1.836

3.  The orientation behaviour of the lesser spearnosed bat, Phyllostomus discolor (Chiroptera) in a model roost. Concurrence of visual, echoacoustical and endogenous spatial information.

Authors:  P Höller; U Schmidt
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 1.836

4.  Echo feedback mediates noise-induced vocal modifications in flying bats.

Authors:  Jinhong Luo; Manman Lu; Jie Luo; Cynthia F Moss
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2022-10-20       Impact factor: 2.389

5.  What noseleaves do for FM bats depends on their degree of sensorial specialization.

Authors:  Dieter Vanderelst; Fons De Mey; Herbert Peremans; Inga Geipel; Elisabeth Kalko; Uwe Firzlaff
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-08-16       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Echolocation intensity and directionality of perching and flying fringe-lipped bats, Trachops cirrhosus (Phyllostomidae).

Authors:  Annemarie Surlykke; Lasse Jakobsen; Elisabeth K V Kalko; Rachel A Page
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2013-06-28       Impact factor: 4.566

7.  The noseleaf of Rhinolophus formosae focuses the Frequency Modulated (FM) component of the calls.

Authors:  Dieter Vanderelst; Ya-Fu Lee; Inga Geipel; Elisabeth K V Kalko; Yen-Min Kuo; Herbert Peremans
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2013-07-19       Impact factor: 4.566

8.  The aerodynamic cost of head morphology in bats: maybe not as bad as it seems.

Authors:  Dieter Vanderelst; Herbert Peremans; Norizham Abdul Razak; Edouard Verstraelen; Grigorios Dimitriadis; Greg Dimitriadis
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-03-04       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Echolocating bats emit a highly directional sonar sound beam in the field.

Authors:  Annemarie Surlykke; Simon Boel Pedersen; Lasse Jakobsen
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2009-03-07       Impact factor: 5.349

10.  Intensity and directionality of bat echolocation signals.

Authors:  Lasse Jakobsen; Signe Brinkløv; Annemarie Surlykke
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2013-04-25       Impact factor: 4.566

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.