Literature DB >> 25941395

Bats adjust their mouth gape to zoom their biosonar field of view.

Pavel Kounitsky1, Jens Rydell2, Eran Amichai2, Arjan Boonman2, Ofri Eitan2, Anthony J Weiss3, Yossi Yovel4.   

Abstract

Active sensing, where sensory acquisition is actively modulated, is an inherent component of almost all sensory systems. Echolocating bats are a prime example of active sensing. They can rapidly adjust many of their biosonar parameters to optimize sensory acquisition. They dynamically adjust pulse design, pulse duration, and pulse rate within dozens of milliseconds according to the sensory information that is required for the task that they are performing. The least studied and least understood degree of freedom in echolocation is emission beamforming--the ability to change the shape of the sonar sound beam in a functional way. Such an ability could have a great impact on the bat's control over its sensory perception. On the one hand, the bat could direct more energy into a narrow sector to zoom its biosonar field of view, and on the other hand, it could widen the beam to increase the space that it senses. We show that freely behaving bats constantly control their biosonar field of view in natural situations by rapidly adjusting their emitter aperture--the mouth gape. The bats dramatically narrowed the beam when entering a confined space, and they dramatically widened it within dozens of milliseconds when flying toward open space. Hence, mouth-emitting bats dynamically adjust their mouth gape to optimize the area that they sense with their echolocation system.

Entities:  

Keywords:  active sensing; bats; beamforming; echolocation; sensory perception

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25941395      PMCID: PMC4450403          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1422843112

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  11 in total

1.  Echolocation range and wingbeat period match in aerial-hawking bats.

Authors:  M W Holderied; O von Helversen
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2003-11-07       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Vespertilionid bats control the width of their biosonar sound beam dynamically during prey pursuit.

Authors:  Lasse Jakobsen; Annemarie Surlykke
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-07-19       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  The emission pattern of vocalizations and directionality of the sonar system in the echolocating bat, Pteronotus parnelli.

Authors:  D Henze; W E O'Neill
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1991-05       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Convergent acoustic field of view in echolocating bats.

Authors:  Lasse Jakobsen; John M Ratcliffe; Annemarie Surlykke
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2012-11-21       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Acoustical beam patterns for bats: some theoretical considerations.

Authors:  G K Strother; M Mogus
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1970-12       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  The acoustic advantage of hunting at low heights above water: behavioural experiments on the European 'trawling' bats Myotis capaccinii, M. dasycneme and M. daubentonii.

Authors:  B M Siemers; P Stilz; H U Schnitzler
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 3.312

7.  Echolocation intensity and directionality of perching and flying fringe-lipped bats, Trachops cirrhosus (Phyllostomidae).

Authors:  Annemarie Surlykke; Lasse Jakobsen; Elisabeth K V Kalko; Rachel A Page
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2013-06-28       Impact factor: 4.566

8.  Innate recognition of water bodies in echolocating bats.

Authors:  Stefan Greif; Björn M Siemers
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2010-11-02       Impact factor: 14.919

9.  Active control of acoustic field-of-view in a biosonar system.

Authors:  Yossi Yovel; Ben Falk; Cynthia F Moss; Nachum Ulanovsky
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2011-09-13       Impact factor: 8.029

10.  Echolocating bats emit a highly directional sonar sound beam in the field.

Authors:  Annemarie Surlykke; Simon Boel Pedersen; Lasse Jakobsen
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2009-03-07       Impact factor: 5.349

View more
  22 in total

1.  Tight coordination of aerial flight maneuvers and sonar call production in insectivorous bats.

Authors:  Benjamin Falk; Joseph Kasnadi; Cynthia F Moss
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 3.312

2.  Calling louder and longer: how bats use biosonar under severe acoustic interference from other bats.

Authors:  Eran Amichai; Gaddi Blumrosen; Yossi Yovel
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2015-12-22       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Sensory gaze stabilization in echolocating bats.

Authors:  O Eitan; G Kosa; Y Yovel
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2019-10-16       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Big brown bats (Eptesicus fuscus) reveal diverse strategies for sonar target tracking in clutter.

Authors:  Beatrice Mao; Murat Aytekin; Gerald S Wilkinson; Cynthia F Moss
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Adaptive learning and recall of motor-sensory sequences in adult echolocating bats.

Authors:  Mor Taub; Yossi Yovel
Journal:  BMC Biol       Date:  2021-08-19       Impact factor: 7.431

6.  Echo feedback mediates noise-induced vocal modifications in flying bats.

Authors:  Jinhong Luo; Manman Lu; Jie Luo; Cynthia F Moss
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2022-10-20       Impact factor: 2.389

7.  Object localization using a biosonar beam: how opening your mouth improves localization.

Authors:  G Arditi; A J Weiss; Y Yovel
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2015-08-26       Impact factor: 2.963

8.  Sonar beam dynamics in leaf-nosed bats.

Authors:  Meike Linnenschmidt; Lutz Wiegrebe
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-07-07       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 9.  Toward a neuromorphic microphone.

Authors:  Leslie S Smith
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2015-10-26       Impact factor: 4.677

10.  Species-specific control of acoustic gaze by echolocating bats, Rhinolophus ferrumequinum nippon and Pipistrellus abramus, during flight.

Authors:  Yasufumi Yamada; Shizuko Hiryu; Yoshiaki Watanabe
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2016-08-26       Impact factor: 1.836

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.