Literature DB >> 23172147

Convergent acoustic field of view in echolocating bats.

Lasse Jakobsen1, John M Ratcliffe, Annemarie Surlykke.   

Abstract

Most echolocating bats exhibit a strong correlation between body size and the frequency of maximum energy in their echolocation calls (peak frequency), with smaller species using signals of higher frequency than larger ones. Size-signal allometry or acoustic detection constraints imposed on wavelength by preferred prey size have been used to explain this relationship. Here we propose the hypothesis that smaller bats emit higher frequencies to achieve directional sonar beams, and that variable beam width is critical for bats. Shorter wavelengths relative to the size of the emitter translate into more directional sound beams. Therefore, bats that emit their calls through their mouths should show a relationship between mouth size and wavelength, driving smaller bats to signals of higher frequency. We found that in a flight room mimicking a closed habitat, six aerial hawking vespertilionid species (ranging in size from 4 to 21 g, ref. 5) produced sonar beams of extraordinarily similar shape and volume. Each species had a directivity index of 11 ± 1 dB (a half-amplitude angle of approximately 37°) and an on-axis sound level of 108 ± 4 dB sound pressure level referenced to 20 μPa root mean square at 10 cm. Thus all bats adapted their calls to achieve similar acoustic fields of view. We propose that the necessity for high directionality has been a key constraint on the evolution of echolocation, which explains the relationship between bat size and echolocation call frequency. Our results suggest that echolocation is a dynamic system that allows different species, regardless of their body size, to converge on optimal fields of view in response to habitat and task.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23172147     DOI: 10.1038/nature11664

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nature        ISSN: 0028-0836            Impact factor:   49.962


  14 in total

1.  Molecular systematics of bats of the genus Myotis (Vespertilionidae) suggests deterministic ecomorphological convergences.

Authors:  M Ruedi; F Mayer
Journal:  Mol Phylogenet Evol       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 4.286

2.  Vespertilionid bats control the width of their biosonar sound beam dynamically during prey pursuit.

Authors:  Lasse Jakobsen; Annemarie Surlykke
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-07-19       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Steering by hearing: a bat's acoustic gaze is linked to its flight motor output by a delayed, adaptive linear law.

Authors:  Kaushik Ghose; Cynthia F Moss
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2006-02-08       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 4.  Adaptive vocal behavior drives perception by echolocation in bats.

Authors:  Cynthia F Moss; Chen Chiu; Annemarie Surlykke
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2011-06-24       Impact factor: 6.627

5.  Echolocation and pursuit of prey by bats.

Authors:  J A Simmons; M B Fenton; M J O'Farrell
Journal:  Science       Date:  1979-01-05       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Measurements of atmospheric attenuation at ultrasonic frequencies and the significance for echolocation by bats.

Authors:  B D Lawrence; J A Simmons
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1982-03       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  The combination of echolocation emission and ear reception enhances directional spectral cues of the big brown bat, Eptesicus fuscus.

Authors:  J M Wotton; R L Jenison; D J Hartley
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Mastication in the little brown bat, Myotis lucifugus.

Authors:  F C Kallen; C Gans
Journal:  J Morphol       Date:  1972-04       Impact factor: 1.804

9.  Scaling of echolocation call parameters in bats.

Authors:  G Jones
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 3.312

10.  Echolocating bats emit a highly directional sonar sound beam in the field.

Authors:  Annemarie Surlykke; Simon Boel Pedersen; Lasse Jakobsen
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2009-03-07       Impact factor: 5.349

View more
  35 in total

1.  Bats adjust their mouth gape to zoom their biosonar field of view.

Authors:  Pavel Kounitsky; Jens Rydell; Eran Amichai; Arjan Boonman; Ofri Eitan; Anthony J Weiss; Yossi Yovel
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-05-04       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Bats coordinate sonar and flight behavior as they forage in open and cluttered environments.

Authors:  Benjamin Falk; Lasse Jakobsen; Annemarie Surlykke; Cynthia F Moss
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2014-11-13       Impact factor: 3.312

3.  Echolocating bats use future-target information for optimal foraging.

Authors:  Emyo Fujioka; Ikkyu Aihara; Miwa Sumiya; Kazuyuki Aihara; Shizuko Hiryu
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-04-11       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Heaviside's dolphins (Cephalorhynchus heavisidii) relax acoustic crypsis to increase communication range.

Authors:  Morgan J Martin; Tess Gridley; Simon H Elwen; Frants H Jensen
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2018-07-18       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Clutter and conspecifics: a comparison of their influence on echolocation and flight behaviour in Daubenton's bat, Myotis daubentonii.

Authors:  Kayleigh Fawcett; John M Ratcliffe
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2015-01-01       Impact factor: 1.836

6.  Echolocation intensity and directionality of perching and flying fringe-lipped bats, Trachops cirrhosus (Phyllostomidae).

Authors:  Annemarie Surlykke; Lasse Jakobsen; Elisabeth K V Kalko; Rachel A Page
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2013-06-28       Impact factor: 4.566

7.  Echolocation in Oilbirds and swiftlets.

Authors:  Signe Brinkløv; M Brock Fenton; John M Ratcliffe
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2013-05-28       Impact factor: 4.566

8.  Bat guilds, a concept to classify the highly diverse foraging and echolocation behaviors of microchiropteran bats.

Authors:  Annette Denzinger; Hans-Ulrich Schnitzler
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2013-07-03       Impact factor: 4.566

9.  Scanning behavior in echolocating common pipistrelle bats (Pipistrellus pipistrellus).

Authors:  Anna-Maria Seibert; Jens C Koblitz; Annette Denzinger; Hans-Ulrich Schnitzler
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-04-08       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Echolocation by the harbour porpoise: life in coastal waters.

Authors:  Lee A Miller; Magnus Wahlberg
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2013-04-15       Impact factor: 4.566

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.