Literature DB >> 8006859

Substrate-gleaning versus aerial-hawking: plasticity in the foraging and echolocation behaviour of the long-eared bat, Myotis evotis.

P A Faure1, R M Barclay.   

Abstract

The foraging and echolocation behaviour of Myotis evotis was investigated during substrate-gleaning and aerial-hawking attacks. Bats gleaned moths from both the ground and a bark-covered trellis, however, they were equally adept at capturing flying moths. The calls emitted by M. evotis during substrate-gleaning sequences were short, broadband, and frequency-modulated (FM). Three behavioural phases were identified: search, hover, and attack. Gleaning search calls were significantly longer in duration, lower in highest frequency, and larger in bandwidth than hover/attack calls. Calls were detected in only 68% of gleaning sequences, and when they were emitted, bats ceased calling approximately 200 ms before attacking. Terminal feeding buzzes, the rapid increase in pulse repetition rate associated with an attempted prey capture, were never recorded during gleaning attacks. The echolocation calls uttered by M. evotis during aerial-hawking foraging sequences were also short duration, high frequency, FM calls. Two distinct acoustic phases were identified: approach and terminal. Approach calls were significantly different from terminal calls in all variables measured. Calls were detected in 100% of aerial-hawking attacks and terminal feeding buzzes were invariably produced. Gleaning hover/attack calls were spectrally similar to aerial approach calls, but were shorter in duration and emitted at a significantly lower (but constant) repetition rate than aerial signals. Although the foraging environment (flight cage contents) remained unchanged between tasks (substrate-gleaning vs. aerial-hawking), bats emitted significantly lower amplitude calls while gleaning. We conclude that M. evotis adjusts its echolocation behaviour to meet the perceptual demands (acoustical constraints) imposed by each foraging situation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8006859     DOI: 10.1007/BF00217386

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comp Physiol A            Impact factor:   1.836


  13 in total

1.  Discrimination of jittered sonar echoes by the echolocating bat, Eptesicus fuscus: the shape of target images in echolocation.

Authors:  J A Simmons; M Ferragamo; C F Moss; S B Stevenson; R A Altes
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A       Date:  1990-11       Impact factor: 1.836

2.  Foraging ecology and audition in echolocating bats.

Authors:  G Neuweiler
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  1989-06       Impact factor: 17.712

3.  Evidence for a spectral basis of texture perception in bat sonar.

Authors:  S Schmidt
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1988-02-18       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Clutter interference along the target range axis in the echolocating bat, Eptesicus fuscus.

Authors:  J A Simmons; S A Kick; A J Moffat; W M Masters; D Kon
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1988-08       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  The echolocation and hunting behavior of the bat, Pipistrellus kuhli.

Authors:  H U Schnitzler; E Kalko; L Miller; A Surlykke
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A       Date:  1987-08       Impact factor: 1.836

6.  The importance of atmospheric attenuation for the echolocation of bats (Chiroptera).

Authors:  D R Griffin
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  1971-02       Impact factor: 2.844

7.  Automatic gain control in the bat's sonar receiver and the neuroethology of echolocation.

Authors:  S A Kick; J A Simmons
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1984-11       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Measurements of atmospheric attenuation at ultrasonic frequencies and the significance for echolocation by bats.

Authors:  B D Lawrence; J A Simmons
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1982-03       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Convergence of temporal and spectral information into acoustic images of complex sonar targets perceived by the echolocating bat, Eptesicus fuscus.

Authors:  J A Simmons; C F Moss; M Ferragamo
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A       Date:  1990-02       Impact factor: 1.836

10.  The gleaning attacks of the northern long-eared bat, Myotis septentrionalis, are relatively inaudible to moths.

Authors:  P A Faure; J H Fullard; J W Dawson
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 3.312

View more
  25 in total

1.  Vespertilionid bats control the width of their biosonar sound beam dynamically during prey pursuit.

Authors:  Lasse Jakobsen; Annemarie Surlykke
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-07-19       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Tight coordination of aerial flight maneuvers and sonar call production in insectivorous bats.

Authors:  Benjamin Falk; Joseph Kasnadi; Cynthia F Moss
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 3.312

3.  Variability of the approach phase of landing echolocating Greater Mouse-eared bats.

Authors:  Mariana L Melcón; Hans-Ulrich Schnitzler; Annette Denzinger
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2008-11-08       Impact factor: 1.836

Review 4.  Duration tuning in the auditory midbrain of echolocating and non-echolocating vertebrates.

Authors:  Riziq Sayegh; Brandon Aubie; Paul A Faure
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2011-02-09       Impact factor: 1.836

5.  Bats coordinate sonar and flight behavior as they forage in open and cluttered environments.

Authors:  Benjamin Falk; Lasse Jakobsen; Annemarie Surlykke; Cynthia F Moss
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2014-11-13       Impact factor: 3.312

6.  Body mass explains digestive traits in small vespertilionid bats.

Authors:  Iván Cabrera-Campos; Jorge D Carballo-Morales; Romeo A Saldaña-Vázquez; Federico Villalobos; Jorge Ayala-Berdon
Journal:  J Comp Physiol B       Date:  2021-02-11       Impact factor: 2.200

7.  Echolocation behaviour of Megaderma lyra during typical orientation situations and while hunting aerial prey: a field study.

Authors:  Sabine Schmidt; Wipula Yapa; Jan-Eric Grunwald
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2010-06-26       Impact factor: 1.836

8.  Reliable detection of predator cues in afferent spike trains of a katydid under high background noise levels.

Authors:  Manfred Hartbauer; Gerald Radspieler; Heiner Römer
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 3.312

9.  Specializations for aerial hawking in the echolocation system of Molossus molossus (Molossidae, Chiroptera).

Authors:  E C Mora; S Macías; M Vater; F Coro; M Kössl
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2004-04-27       Impact factor: 1.836

10.  Can two streams of auditory information be processed simultaneously? Evidence from the gleaning bat Antrozous pallidus.

Authors:  J R Barber; K A Razak; Z M Fuzessery
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2003-10-15       Impact factor: 1.836

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.