Literature DB >> 2809753

Effect of source strength and attenuation on dual photon absorptiometry.

M C DaCosta1, M M Luckey, D E Meier, J P Mandeli, M L DeLaney, P H Stritzke, S J Goldsmith.   

Abstract

A systematic error in dual photon absorptiometry (DPA) measurements of bone mineral density (BMD) related to source strength has been previously described and attributed to an erroneous algorithm for deadtime correction. Since detected counts (or photon flux) is a product of source strength and attenuation, the effect of various source activities and attenuation depths on BMD calculations were evaluated using a phantom. Ten DPA scans were acquired at two source strengths, 0.3 and 1.0 Ci, and at each of two water depths, 16.4 and 24.5 cm. These activities and depths are within the range encountered clinically. Scans were acquired and processed using a commercially available lumbar spine scanner and software, and were reanalyzed with two upgraded versions of software. Mean BMD obtained with the initial software varied by 2 to 14% with changes in both sources strength and attenuating depth. Software revisions reduced but did not entirely eliminate these differences. The remaining 6% discrepancy is of sufficient magnitude to influence both patient management and research investigations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2809753

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Nucl Med        ISSN: 0161-5505            Impact factor:   10.057


  4 in total

1.  In vitro comparability of dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) bone densitometers.

Authors:  M L Rencken; R Murano; B L Drinkwater; C H Chesnut
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1991-04       Impact factor: 4.333

2.  An evaluation of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry and comparison with dual-photon absorptiometry.

Authors:  B Lees; J C Stevenson
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 4.507

3.  Influence of patient's weight on dual-photon absorptiometry and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry measurements of bone mineral density.

Authors:  P Martin; M Verhas; C Als; L Geerts; J Paternot; P Bergmann
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 4.507

4.  Time related bias in longitudinal studies using dual photon absorptiometry.

Authors:  S Rozenberg; J Vandromme; A Peretz; J P Praet; C Robyn; H Ham
Journal:  J Endocrinol Invest       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 4.256

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.