Literature DB >> 9604054

Evaluation of the European Spine Phantom in a multi-centre clinical trial.

B Lees1, S W Garland, C Walton, J C Stevenson.   

Abstract

The European Spine Phantom (ESP) has recently been developed as a universal standard for instruments measuring bone density. The ESP is composed of three semi-anthropomorphic hydroxyapatite vertebrae of varying densities surrounded by soft tissue equivalent plastic designed to resemble human bone and soft tissue when scanned on bone densitometers. In multi-centre studies it is particularly important to verify that each participating bone densitometer is performing in a stable and linear fashion. The aim of this study was to evaluate the ESP within the context of a multi-centre clinical trial. Eighteen centres in the UK and Canada with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) instruments (Lunar DPX, DPX-alpha and DPX-L) participated in the study. The ESP was scanned 10 times on each instrument without repositioning using standardized protocols. The precision of the bone mineral density (BMD) measurements (LI-3) expressed as a coefficient of variation ranged from 0.4% to 1.1% (mean 0.7%). The mean BMD of each instrument was expressed as a percentage difference from the overall mean and ranged from -1.33% to 1.33%. Linear regression analysis showed that all instruments behaved in a linear fashion across the range of densities with correlation coefficients all > or = 0.999 and standard errors of the estimate < 1.5% of the mean BMD ESP value. The data from this study demonstrate that the ESP is a useful phantom for assessing the linearity, stability and differences between DXA instruments from one manufacturer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9604054     DOI: 10.1007/bf02652564

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Osteoporos Int        ISSN: 0937-941X            Impact factor:   4.507


  13 in total

1.  A phantom for standardization and quality control in spinal bone mineral measurements by QCT and DXA: design considerations and specifications.

Authors:  W A Kalender
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1992 May-Jun       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  In vitro comparability of dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) bone densitometers.

Authors:  M L Rencken; R Murano; B L Drinkwater; C H Chesnut
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1991-04       Impact factor: 4.333

3.  Intersite comparison of the Hologic QDR-1000 dual energy X-ray bone densitometer.

Authors:  G M Blake; C M Tong; I Fogelman
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  1991-05       Impact factor: 3.039

4.  Longitudinal precision of dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry in a multicenter study. The Nafarelin/Bone Study Group.

Authors:  E S Orwoll; S K Oviatt
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  1991-02       Impact factor: 6.741

5.  Calibration of dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry for bone density.

Authors:  R B Mazess; J A Trempe; J P Bisek; J A Hanson; D Hans
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  1991-08       Impact factor: 6.741

6.  Cross-calibration of DXA scanners for spine measurements.

Authors:  P Tothill
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 4.507

7.  Quality control of DXA instruments in multicenter trials.

Authors:  K G Faulkner; M R McClung
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 4.507

8.  Quality assurance for bone densitometry research studies: concept and impact.

Authors:  C C Glüer; K G Faulkner; M J Estilo; K Engelke; J Rosin; H K Genant
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 4.507

9.  Replacing DXA scanners: cross-calibration with phantoms may be misleading.

Authors:  G M Blake
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 4.333

10.  Universal standardization for dual x-ray absorptiometry: patient and phantom cross-calibration results.

Authors:  H K Genant; S Grampp; C C Glüer; K G Faulkner; M Jergas; K Engelke; S Hagiwara; C Van Kuijk
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 6.741

View more
  2 in total

1.  Variations in diagnostic performances of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry in the northwest of The Netherlands.

Authors:  Klaas P Staal; Jan C Roos; Radu A Manoliu; Piet J Kostense; Paul Lips
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2003-11-20       Impact factor: 4.507

2.  Result of Proficiency Test and Comparison of Accuracy Using a European Spine Phantom among the Three Bone Densitometries.

Authors:  Ae Ja Park; Jee-Hye Choi; Hyun Kang; Ki Jeong Park; Ha Young Kim; Seo Hwa Kim; Deog-Yoon Kim; Seung-Hwan Park; Yong-Chan Ha
Journal:  J Bone Metab       Date:  2015-05-31
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.