Literature DB >> 7953987

Ultrasound measurements on the os calcis in a prospective multicenter study.

D Hans1, A M Schott, M C Chapuy, M Benamar, P D Kotzki, C Cormier, J M Pouilles, P J Meunier.   

Abstract

Ultrasonic assessment is a new approach to assess both quality and density. Two ultrasonic parameters are measured on the os calcis: the attenuation or broadband ultrasound attenuation (BUA) and the velocity or speed of sound (SOS). The interunit variations in vitro and in vivo of an ultrasound instrument, the Lunar Achilles system, used in a French multicenter study named EPIDOS, were calculated and the stability of these instruments over a 12-month period was evaluated. A third parameter called "stiffness index," calculated from the SOS and BUA, was also used in this study. The average CV in vitro for the BUA and SOS was 0.92% and 0.12%, respectively, and the average CV in vivo for the BUA, the SOS, and the stiffness index was 1.83%, 0.23%, and 1.9%, respectively. The interunit (or inter-machines) variations were calculated by a one-way analysis of variance. We detected small but significant measurement differences among centers on a phantom for both SOS (maximum significant difference 0.4%) and stiffness (maximum significant difference 3.5%) but not for BUA. Similar differences were found in vivo. The precision over 12 months of the interunit variations in vitro was evaluated by measuring a single phantom traveling from one center to another several times. The range of the CV for the BUA (1.54-0.51%), for the SOS (0.25-0.14%), and for the stiffness index (2.26-1.10%) are explained in part by technical failures. The variation among the five Achilles was estimated by the combined CV which was 1.42% for the BUA, 0.32% for the SOS, and 2.33% for the stiffness index. In conclusion, our findings indicate that equipment from one manufacturer appears to be consistent between machines for the BUA, but not completely for the SOS. The results for this stiffness index are necessarily influenced by both SOS and BUA. The short-term and long-term interunit precision is good, both in vitro and in vivo. Such results provide increased confidence in multicenter clinical trials where ultrasonic data are pooled.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7953987     DOI: 10.1007/BF00297182

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int        ISSN: 0171-967X            Impact factor:   4.333


  16 in total

1.  Bone mass measurement by DXA: influence of analysis procedures and interunit variation.

Authors:  C Trevisan; G G Gandolini; P Sibilla; M Penotti; M P Caraceni; S Ortolani
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 6.741

2.  In vitro comparability of dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) bone densitometers.

Authors:  M L Rencken; R Murano; B L Drinkwater; C H Chesnut
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1991-04       Impact factor: 4.333

3.  Longitudinal precision of dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry in a multicenter study. The Nafarelin/Bone Study Group.

Authors:  E S Orwoll; S K Oviatt
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  1991-02       Impact factor: 6.741

4.  Bone ultrasonic attenuation in women: reproducibility, normal variation and comparison with photon absorptiometry.

Authors:  J G Truscott; M Simpson; S P Stewart; R Milner; C F Westmacott; B Oldroyd; J A Evans; A Horsman; C M Langston; M A Smith
Journal:  Clin Phys Physiol Meas       Date:  1992-02

5.  Ultrasound measurements on os calcis: precision and age-related changes in a normal female population.

Authors:  A M Schott; D Hans; E Sornay-Rendu; P D Delmas; P J Meunier
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 4.507

6.  Preliminary evaluation of a new ultrasound bone densitometer.

Authors:  B Lees; J C Stevenson
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 4.333

Review 7.  Ultrasonic assessment of bone: a review.

Authors:  D Hans; A M Schott; P J Meunier
Journal:  Eur J Med       Date:  1993-03

8.  Screening for osteoporosis: comparison between dual energy X-ray absorptiometry and broadband ultrasound attenuation in 1000 perimenopausal women.

Authors:  A Massie; D M Reid; R W Porter
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 4.507

9.  Ultrasound attenuation of the calcaneus in the female population: normative data.

Authors:  J E Damilakis; E Dretakis; N C Gourtsoyiannis
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 4.333

10.  Measurements of postmenopausal bone loss with a new contact ultrasound system.

Authors:  R J Herd; G M Blake; T Ramalingam; C G Miller; P J Ryan; I Fogelman
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 4.333

View more
  21 in total

1.  Effect of daily walking steps on ultrasound parameters of the calcaneus in elderly Japanese women.

Authors:  J Kitagawa; F Omasu; Y Nakahara
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2003-03-12       Impact factor: 4.507

2.  Influence of handedness on calcaneal ultrasound: implications for assessment of osteoporosis and study design.

Authors:  G M Howard; T V Nguyen; N A Pocock; P J Kelly; J A Eisman
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 4.507

3.  Comparisons of bone mass measurements on various skeletal sites including quantitative ultrasonography of the calcaneus for assessing age-related losses, their correlations, and diagnostic agreement using the Japanese and WHO criteria for osteoporosis.

Authors:  Yasushi Imashuku; Masahiko Takada; Kiyoshi Murata
Journal:  Radiat Med       Date:  2007-05-28

4.  Ultrasound and dual X-ray absorptiometry measurement of the calcaneus: influence of region of interest location.

Authors:  K Brooke-Wavell; P R Jones; D W Pye
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 4.333

5.  Age-related changes in Os calcis ultrasonic indices: a 2-year prospective study.

Authors:  A M Schott; D Hans; P Garnero; E Sornay-Rendu; P D Delmas; P J Meunier
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 4.507

6.  Influence of anthropometric parameters on ultrasound measurements of Os calcis.

Authors:  D Hans; A M Schott; M E Arlot; E Sornay; P D Delmas; P J Meunier
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 4.507

7.  Ultrasonic measurement: an evaluation of three heel bone scanners compared with a bench-top system.

Authors:  R Strelitzki; A J Clarke; J G Truscott; J A Evans
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 4.507

8.  A European multicenter comparison of quantitative ultrasound measurement variables: the OPUS study.

Authors:  M A Paggiosi; R Barkmann; C C Glüer; C Roux; D M Reid; D Felsenberg; M Bradburn; R Eastell
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2012-02-14       Impact factor: 4.507

9.  Pathways of transmission of ultrasound energy through the distal metaphysis of the second phalanx of pigs: an in vitro study.

Authors:  R Cadossi; V Canè
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 4.507

10.  Should age influence the choice of quantitative bone assessment technique in elderly women? The EPIDOS study.

Authors:  A M Schott; B Kassaï Koupaï; D Hans; P Dargent-Molina; R Ecochard; D C Bauer; G Bréart; P J Meunier
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2004-01-17       Impact factor: 4.507

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.