Literature DB >> 20549502

The association between the sagittal femoral stem alignment and the resulting femoral head centre in total hip arthroplasty.

Michael Müller1, Dirk Crucius, Carsten Perka, Stephan Tohtz.   

Abstract

Adequate stem alignment is essential for the success of Total Hip Arthroplasty (THA) to avoid dislocation and impingement. One factor that has not been sufficiently investigated so far is the stem tilting in the sagittal plane, which has an influence on the position of the centre of the femoral head and thus also on prosthesis torsion. We aimed to evaluate sagittal stem position using 3D-CTs in patients with THA and to develop a mathematical-geometrical model to simulate the functional correlation between sagittal stem tilting and the influence on functional anteversion. Thirty patients with THA underwent a CT-scan. By 3D-reconstruction of the CT-data, femoral-/prosthesis-axis, torsion and sagittal tilt were determined. In accordance with the position of the femoral and prosthesis axes, the rotatory (rAV) (surgically adjusted) and functional (depending on sagittal tilt) anteversion (fAV) was measured. A three dimentional-coordinate transformation was also performed using the Euler-angles to derive a mathematical-geometrical correlation between sagittal stem tilting and corresponding influence on anteversion. The mean rAV was 8° (-11.6-26°), the fAV 18° (6.2-37°), and the difference 10° (8.8-18°). The mean degree of stem tilting was 5.2° (0.7-9°) anterior towards the femoral axis. The individually measured parameters are reflected in the mathematical-geometrical model. Depending on the extent of the sagittal deviation, a clear influence on the torsion emerges. For example, a stem implanted at a 15° anteverted angle with a sagittal tilt by two degrees towards anterior results in a fAV of 20°. A clear association between the sagittal stem alignment and the impact on the fAV was demonstrated. Hence, the rotatory anteversion intended by the surgeon may be functionally significantly different. This might pose an increased risk of dislocation or impingement. The sagittal tilt of the prosthesis should therefore be considered in the context of impingement and dislocation diagnosis. In this respect, we recommend a 3D-analysis of stem alignment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20549502      PMCID: PMC3167395          DOI: 10.1007/s00264-010-1047-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Orthop        ISSN: 0341-2695            Impact factor:   3.075


  12 in total

Review 1.  Enhanced acetabular component positioning through computer-assisted navigation.

Authors:  Thomas Ybinger; Wolfgang Kumpan
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Risk factors for accelerated polyethylene wear and osteolysis in ABG I total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Jiri Gallo; Vitezslav Havranek; Jana Zapletalova
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2009-02-13       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  Combined anteversion technique for total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Lawrence D Dorr; Aamer Malik; Manish Dastane; Zhinian Wan
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-11-01       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  The effect of the orientation of the acetabular and femoral components on the range of motion of the hip at different head-neck ratios.

Authors:  D D D'Lima; A G Urquhart; K O Buehler; R H Walker; C W Colwell
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 5.284

5.  Factors predisposing to dislocation after primary total hip arthroplasty: a multivariate analysis.

Authors:  B M Jolles; P Zangger; P-F Leyvraz
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 4.757

6.  The Frank Stinchfield Award: Morphologic features of the acetabulum and femur: anteversion angle and implant positioning.

Authors:  M Maruyama; J R Feinberg; W N Capello; J A D'Antonio
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Direction of hip arthroplasty dislocation in patients with femoral neck fractures.

Authors:  Anders Enocson; Gunilla Lapidus; Hans Törnkvist; Jan Tidermark; Lasse J Lapidus
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2010-01-22       Impact factor: 3.075

8.  Influence of the acetabular cup position on hip load during arthroplasty in hip dysplasia.

Authors:  Goran Bicanic; Domagoj Delimar; Marko Delimar; Marko Pecina
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2008-11-18       Impact factor: 3.075

9.  Early osteolysis associated with trunion-liner impingement.

Authors:  Mark Earll; Thomas Fehring; William L Griffin; J Bohannon Mason; Thomas H McCoy
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  Causes of and treatment protocol for instability of total hip replacement.

Authors:  L D Dorr; Z Wan
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 4.176

View more
  16 in total

1.  [Principles and new concepts in computer-navigated total hip arthroplasty].

Authors:  T Renkawitz; M Wörner; E Sendtner; M Weber; P Lechler; J Grifka
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 1.087

2.  Combined anteversion technique reduced the dislocation in cementless total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Yasuharu Nakashima; Masanobu Hirata; Mio Akiyama; Takashi Itokawa; Takuaki Yamamoto; Goro Motomura; Masanobu Ohishi; Satoshi Hamai; Yukihide Iwamoto
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2013-09-13       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  [Diagnostics and therapy of luxation after total hip arthroplasty].

Authors:  B Preininger; F Haschke; C Perka
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 1.087

4.  The sagittal stem alignment and the stem version clearly influence the impingement-free range of motion in total hip arthroplasty: a computer model-based analysis.

Authors:  Michael Müller; Georg Duda; Carsten Perka; Stephan Tohtz
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-07-02       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  Influencing factors for the increased stem version compared to the native femur in cementless total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Masanobu Hirata; Yasuharu Nakashima; Takashi Itokawa; Masanobu Ohishi; Taishi Sato; Mio Akiyama; Daisuke Hara; Yukihide Iwamoto
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2014-02-07       Impact factor: 3.075

6.  Optimal anterior femoral offset for functional range of motion in total hip arthroplasty--a computer simulation study.

Authors:  Masanobu Hirata; Yasuharu Nakashima; Daisuke Hara; Masayuki Kanazawa; Yusuke Kohno; Kensei Yoshimoto; Yukihide Iwamoto
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2014-09-25       Impact factor: 3.075

7.  Factors related to disagreement in implant size between preoperative CT-based planning and the actual implants used intraoperatively for total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Takeshi Ogawa; Masaki Takao; Takashi Sakai; Nobuhiko Sugano
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2017-12-13       Impact factor: 2.924

8.  Does the surgical approach influence the implant alignment in total hip arthroplasty? Comparative study between the direct anterior and the anterolateral approaches in the supine position.

Authors:  Yuya Kawarai; Satoshi Iida; Junichi Nakamura; Yoshiyuki Shinada; Chiho Suzuki; Seiji Ohtori
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2017-05-31       Impact factor: 3.075

9.  The association between Femoral Tilt and impingement-free range-of-motion in total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Tobias Renkawitz; Martin Haimerl; Lars Dohmen; Sabine Gneiting; Philipp Lechler; Michael Woerner; Hans-Robert Springorum; Markus Weber; Patrick Sussmann; Ernst Sendtner; Joachim Grifka
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2012-05-04       Impact factor: 2.362

10.  Correlation between lag screw route and the ideal insertion point of the intramedullary nail.

Authors:  Junya Yoshitani; Tamon Kabata; Yoshitomo Kajino; Daisuke Inoue; Takaaki Ohmori; Ken Ueoka; Yuki Yamamuro; Atsushi Taninaka; Hiroyuki Tsuchiya
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-07-02       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.