Literature DB >> 9917599

Causes of and treatment protocol for instability of total hip replacement.

L D Dorr1, Z Wan.   

Abstract

Dislocation of the total hip replacement is a devastating complication, physically and mentally. It was determined whether there are radiographic or operative findings predictive of repeat dislocation and whether there are causes of dislocation that require immediate reoperation. A previously published classification of dislocations was used which evaluates (1) positional (no radiographic abnormality); (2) component malposition (femur or acetabulum), which is inadequate version or position of the acetabular or femoral component; (3) soft tissue imbalance (change in the length or displacement of the hip), which is a change in the muscle functional length of the hip; and (4) component malposition and soft tissue imbalance. Categories of treatment of dislocations were established that could be correlated to the cause of the dislocation: (1) Category I is a successful closed reduction; (2) Category II is a successful reoperation; (3) Category III is a reoperation with subsequent repeat dislocations successfully treated with closed reduction; and (4) Category IV is comprised of hips that require multiple reoperations for treatment of dislocations. The results are that any dislocation of any origin may be treated successfully with closed reduction so that this should be the first choice of treatment. To avoid multiple treatments, immediate reoperation should be performed if the hip is unstable when the patient is examined under anesthesia after the closed reduction. Hips with soft tissue imbalance and weakness of the abductor musculature, with or without component malposition, are most at risk for multiple operations. These hips may be considered for mechanical stability (constraint in the acetabular replacement) at reoperation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9917599     DOI: 10.1097/00003086-199810000-00015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  41 in total

1.  The association between the sagittal femoral stem alignment and the resulting femoral head centre in total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Michael Müller; Dirk Crucius; Carsten Perka; Stephan Tohtz
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2010-06-13       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Range of motion measurement of an artificial hip joint using CT images.

Authors:  Haosheng Sun; Hidenori Inaoka; Yutaka Fukuoka; Tadashi Masuda; Akimasa Ishida; Sadao Morita
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2007-09-26       Impact factor: 2.602

3.  Computer-assisted versus manual alignment in THA: a probabilistic approach to range of motion.

Authors:  Anthony J Petrella; Joshua Q Stowe; Darryl D D'Lima; Paul J Rullkoetter; Peter J Laz
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-10-22       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 4.  Imaging and navigation measurement of acetabular component position in THA.

Authors:  Zhinian Wan; Aamer Malik; Branislav Jaramaz; Lisa Chao; Lawrence D Dorr
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-11-01       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  [Minimally invasive posterior approach for total hip arthroplasty].

Authors:  B Fink; A Mittelstaedt
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 1.087

6.  Use of a dual mobility socket to manage total hip arthroplasty instability.

Authors:  Olivier Guyen; Vincent Pibarot; Gualter Vaz; Christophe Chevillotte; Jacques Béjui-Hugues
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-09-09       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 7.  How reverse shoulder arthroplasty works.

Authors:  Matthew Walker; Jordan Brooks; Matthew Willis; Mark Frankle
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Bony impingement limits design-related increases in hip range of motion.

Authors:  Adam Bunn; Clifford W Colwell; Darryl D D'Lima
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  Pose estimation of artificial hip joint using a single radiographic projection.

Authors:  H Inaoka; A Ishidal; Y Fukuoka; K Suzuki; M Matsubara
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 2.602

10.  The unstable total hip replacement.

Authors:  F D'Angelo; L Murena; G Zatti; P Cherubino
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 1.251

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.