Literature DB >> 24384890

[Diagnostics and therapy of luxation after total hip arthroplasty].

B Preininger1, F Haschke, C Perka.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Luxation following endoprosthetic hip replacement represents a frequent and severe complication and is the reason for a relevant number of hip arthroplasty revision interventions. The probability of occurrence of luxation of a total hip arthroplasty is associated with the indications, patient and operation-specific risk factors. Approximately 50 % of luxations after total hip arthroplasty occur within 3 months of the operation (early luxation). DIAGNOSTICS: The diagnostics of luxation of total hip arthroplasty are carried out by clinical and radiological methods. The causative assignment is made by assessment of joint stability, the bony situation (e.g. loosening, periprosthetic fracture and defects) and the soft tissue (e.g. pelvitrochanterian musculature). In cases of clinical and paraclinical signs of infection and of late luxations, a joint puncture is indicated. THERAPY: Therapy decisions are made depending on the cause (e.g. implant malpositioning, pelvitrochanterian insufficiency, impingement, incongruence between head and inlay and combinations of causes). Therapy of acute total hip prosthesis luxation begins with imaging controlled repositioning carried out with the patient under adequate analgesia and sedation. Conservative therapy is carried out by immobilization with a hip joint orthesis or pelvis-leg cast for 6 weeks. Operative therapy strategies for recurrent luxation are restoration of the correct implant position and sufficient soft tissue tension. Larger hip heads, bipolar heads and tripolar cups are more commonly used due to the geometrically lower probability of dislocation (higher jumping distance). Luxation of total hip prostheses due to infection is treated according to the principles of periprosthetic infection therapy. The rate of recurrence of luxation of 30 % is high so that in cases of unsuccessful therapy treatment should best be carried out in a center for revision arthroplasty.
CONCLUSIONS: The search for the exact cause of total hip prosthesis luxation is extremely important. A classification is only possible when the exact cause is known and together with patient and implant-specific details the therapeutic approach can be ascertained. In revision operations the intraoperative functional diagnostics must be exactly documented. The reasons for delayed luxations could be prosthesis infections, abrasion and loosening.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24384890     DOI: 10.1007/s00132-013-2125-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Orthopade        ISSN: 0085-4530            Impact factor:   1.087


  34 in total

1.  Femoral head size is a risk factor for total hip luxation: a study of 42,987 primary hip arthroplasties from the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register.

Authors:  Sven Byström; Birgitte Espehaug; Ove Furnes; Leif I Havelin
Journal:  Acta Orthop Scand       Date:  2003-10

2.  Indications for early hip revision surgery in the UK--a re-analysis of NJR data.

Authors:  Ben J Bolland; Sarah L Whitehouse; A John Timperley
Journal:  Hip Int       Date:  2012 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.135

Review 3.  Instability after total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  B F Morrey
Journal:  Orthop Clin North Am       Date:  1992-04       Impact factor: 2.472

4.  Dual poly liner mobility optimizes wear and stability in THA: affirms.

Authors:  S David Stulberg
Journal:  Orthopedics       Date:  2011-09-09       Impact factor: 1.390

5.  The use of abduction bracing for the prevention of early postoperative dislocation after revision total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Trevor G Murray; Nathan G Wetters; Mario Moric; Scott M Sporer; Wayne G Paprosky; Craig J Della Valle
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2012-05-17       Impact factor: 4.757

6.  Postoperative total hip prosthetic femoral head dislocations. Incidence, etiologic factors, and management.

Authors:  R S Turner
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Dislocations after total hip-replacement arthroplasties.

Authors:  G E Lewinnek; J L Lewis; R Tarr; C L Compere; J R Zimmerman
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1978-03       Impact factor: 5.284

8.  Factors predisposing to dislocation after primary total hip arthroplasty: a multivariate analysis.

Authors:  B M Jolles; P Zangger; P-F Leyvraz
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 4.757

9.  Management of infection associated with total hip arthroplasty according to a treatment algorithm.

Authors:  S G Giulieri; P Graber; P E Ochsner; W Zimmerli
Journal:  Infection       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 3.553

Review 10.  The unstable total hip replacement.

Authors:  Douglas E Padgett; Hideki Warashina
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 4.176

View more
  8 in total

1.  Pelvic tilt compensates for increased acetabular anteversion.

Authors:  Robert K Zahn; Sarah Grotjohann; Heiko Ramm; Stefan Zachow; Michael Putzier; Carsten Perka; Stephan Tohtz
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-08-30       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Current standard rules of combined anteversion prevent prosthetic impingement but ignore osseous contact in total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Markus Weber; Michael Woerner; Benjamin Craiovan; Florian Voellner; Michael Worlicek; Hans-Robert Springorum; Joachim Grifka; Tobias Renkawitz
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2016-04-22       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  Central X-ray beam correction of radiographic acetabular cup measurement after THA: an experimental study.

Authors:  T Schwarz; M Weber; M Wörner; T Renkawitz; J Grifka; B Craiovan
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2016-10-06       Impact factor: 2.924

Review 4.  [Use of dual mobility cups for revision hip arthroplasty].

Authors:  E Röhner; G Matziolis
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 1.087

5.  Accuracy of measuring acetabular cup position after total hip arthroplasty: comparison between a radiographic planning software and three-dimensional computed tomography.

Authors:  Vahdettin Bayraktar; Markus Weber; Frederik von Kunow; Florian Zeman; Benjamin Craiovan; Tobias Renkawitz; Joachim Grifka; Michael Woerner
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2016-06-08       Impact factor: 3.075

6.  Navigation is Equal to Estimation by Eye and Palpation in Preventing Psoas Impingement in THA.

Authors:  Markus Weber; Michael Woerner; Benedikt Messmer; Joachim Grifka; Tobias Renkawitz
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2016-09-07       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 7.  [Discrepancy between radiographic and true cup position after total hip arthroplasty : Are we interpreting our radiographic quality indicators correctly? Video article].

Authors:  T J Schwarz; M Weber; T Renkawitz; F Greimel; F Leiss; J Grifka; J Schaumburger
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2020-03       Impact factor: 1.087

8.  Soft tissue restricts impingement-free mobility in total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Michael Woerner; Markus Weber; Ernst Sendtner; Robert Springorum; Michael Worlicek; Benjamin Craiovan; Joachim Grifka; Tobias Renkawitz
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2016-05-06       Impact factor: 3.075

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.