Literature DB >> 20479653

Contrast-enhanced whole-heart coronary magnetic resonance angiography at 3 T using interleaved echo planar imaging.

Himanshu Bhat1, Qi Yang, Sven Zuehlsdorff, Kuncheng Li, Debiao Li.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The goal of this work was to reduce the scan time of contrast-enhanced whole-heart coronary magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) by using a gradient echo interleaved echo planar imaging (GRE-EPI) sequence at 3 T field strength.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A GRE-EPI sequence was optimized to acquire contrast-enhanced whole-heart coronary MRA at 3 T. First-order phase correction was used for alignment of the odd and even echoes in the GRE-EPI echo train. Single and dual reference scan techniques for estimation of the linear phase correction parameters were evaluated using both phantom and volunteer studies. The GRE-EPI readout was combined with parallel imaging for a further reduction in scan time. To avoid image distortions, calibration signals for coil sensitivity estimation were acquired in a separate low resolution GRE scan before the whole-heart GRE-EPI scan. Eight healthy volunteers were scanned with the optimized contrast-enhanced GRE-EPI sequence. GRE-EPI images were acquired during slow infusion (0.3 mL/s) of 0.1 mmol/kg body weight of Gd-BOPTA. For comparison purposes, the same 8 volunteers were scanned again in a separate scan session using a traditional GRE sequence with double the dose (0.2 mmol/kg body weight) of the same contrast agent with the same injection rate. The contrast-enhanced GRE-EPI and contrast-enhanced GRE techniques were compared in terms of relative signal-to-noise ratio (rSNR), relative contrast-to-noise ratio (rCNR), image quality scores, and visualized vessel lengths.
RESULTS: Both, phantom and volunteer studies demonstrated that the dual reference scan phase correction technique was a key step for obtaining satisfactory image quality using GRE-EPI at 3 T. Whole-heart coronary MRA with a spatial resolution of 1.0 x 1.0 x 2.0 mm3 was acquired with the GRE-EPI sequence in an average scan time of 2.5 +/- 0.6 minutes, compared with 8.6 +/- 2.7 minutes for the GRE technique. The GRE-EPI technique had lower rCNR compared with the GRE sequence. The image quality and coronary artery visualization with the GRE-EPI technique were adequate, and there was no statistically significant difference in the image quality scores, rSNR, and visualized coronary artery lengths between the GRE-EPI and GRE techniques.
CONCLUSIONS: Contrast-enhanced whole-heart coronary MRA using the GRE-EPI technique resulted in excellent delineation of all the major coronary arteries and compared with current GRE techniques demonstrated a factor of 2 reduction in contrast agent dose and a factor of 3 reduction in scan time.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20479653      PMCID: PMC2902693          DOI: 10.1097/RLI.0b013e3181d8df32

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Invest Radiol        ISSN: 0020-9996            Impact factor:   6.016


  34 in total

1.  High spatial resolution EPI using an odd number of interleaves.

Authors:  M H Buonocore; D C Zhu
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 4.668

2.  Generalized autocalibrating partially parallel acquisitions (GRAPPA).

Authors:  Mark A Griswold; Peter M Jakob; Robin M Heidemann; Mathias Nittka; Vladimir Jellus; Jianmin Wang; Berthold Kiefer; Axel Haase
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 4.668

Review 3.  Autocalibrated coil sensitivity estimation for parallel imaging.

Authors:  Mark A Griswold; Felix Breuer; Martin Blaimer; Stephan Kannengiesser; Robin M Heidemann; Matthias Mueller; Mathias Nittka; Vladimir Jellus; Berthold Kiefer; Peter M Jakob
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 4.044

4.  Clinical multishot DW-EPI through parallel imaging with considerations of susceptibility, motion, and noise.

Authors:  Stefan Skare; Rexford D Newbould; David B Clayton; Gregory W Albers; Scott Nagle; Roland Bammer
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 4.668

Review 5.  Coronary magnetic resonance angiography.

Authors:  Matthias Stuber; Robert G Weiss
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 4.813

6.  Artifact reduction in EPI with phase-encoded reference scan.

Authors:  X Hu; T H Le
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 4.668

7.  Phase errors in multi-shot echo planar imaging.

Authors:  D A Feinberg; K Oshio
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 4.668

8.  Preliminary report on in vivo coronary MRA at 3 Tesla in humans.

Authors:  Matthias Stuber; René M Botnar; Stefan E Fischer; Rolf Lamerichs; Jouke Smink; Paul Harvey; Warren J Manning
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 4.668

9.  Self-tracking of contrast kinetics for automatic triggering of contrast-enhanced whole-heart coronary magnetic resonance angiography.

Authors:  Himanshu Bhat; Peng Lai; Debiao Li
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 4.813

10.  Whole-heart coronary magnetic resonance angiography at 3 Tesla in 5 minutes with slow infusion of Gd-BOPTA, a high-relaxivity clinical contrast agent.

Authors:  Xiaoming Bi; James C Carr; Debiao Li
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 3.737

View more
  10 in total

1.  Non-contrast renal MRA using multi-shot gradient echo EPI at 3-T MRI.

Authors:  Kosuke Morita; Takeshi Nakaura; Masami Yoneyama; Yasunori Nagayama; Masafumi Kidoh; Hiroyuki Uetani; Osamu Ikeda; Yasuyuki Yamashita; Toshinori Hirai
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2021-01-21       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 2.  Coronary imaging techniques with emphasis on CT and MRI.

Authors:  Mathieu Lederlin; Jean-Benoit Thambo; Valérie Latrabe; Olivier Corneloup; Hubert Cochet; Michel Montaudon; François Laurent
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2011-11-30

3.  Compressed sensing with wavelet domain dependencies for coronary MRI: a retrospective study.

Authors:  Mehmet Akçakaya; Seunghoon Nam; Peng Hu; Mehdi H Moghari; Long H Ngo; Vahid Tarokh; Warren J Manning; Reza Nezafat
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 10.048

4.  Contrast-enhanced whole-heart coronary magnetic resonance angiography at 3 T with radial EPI.

Authors:  Himanshu Bhat; Qi Yang; Sven Zuehlsdorff; Kuncheng Li; Debiao Li
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2011-02-08       Impact factor: 4.668

Review 5.  Parallel MR imaging.

Authors:  Anagha Deshmane; Vikas Gulani; Mark A Griswold; Nicole Seiberlich
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 4.813

6.  Coronary artery angiography and myocardial viability imaging: a 3.0-T contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance coronary artery angiography with Gd-BOPTA.

Authors:  Hong Yun; Hang Jin; Shan Yang; Dong Huang; Zhang-wei Chen; Meng-su Zeng
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2013-09-26       Impact factor: 2.357

7.  MRI and CT in the diagnosis of coronary artery disease: indications and applications.

Authors:  Konstantin Nikolaou; Hatem Alkadhi; Fabian Bamberg; Sebastian Leschka; Bernd J Wintersperger
Journal:  Insights Imaging       Date:  2010-11-23

8.  Single-Breath-Hold Whole-heart Unenhanced Coronary MRA Using Multi-shot Gradient Echo EPI at 3T: Comparison with Free-breathing Turbo-field-echo Coronary MRA on Healthy Volunteers.

Authors:  Yuji Iyama; Takeshi Nakaura; Yasunori Nagayama; Seitaro Oda; Daisuke Utsunomiya; Masafumi Kidoh; Hideaki Yuki; Kenichiro Hirata; Tomohiro Namimoto; Mika Kitajima; Kosuke Morita; Yoshinori Funama; Atsushi Takemura; Tomoyuki Okuaki; Yasuyuki Yamashita
Journal:  Magn Reson Med Sci       Date:  2017-06-26       Impact factor: 2.471

9.  Noncontrast free-breathing respiratory self-navigated coronary artery cardiovascular magnetic resonance angiography at 3 T using lipid insensitive binomial off-resonant excitation (LIBRE).

Authors:  Jessica A M Bastiaansen; Ruud B van Heeswijk; Matthias Stuber; Davide Piccini
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2019-07-11       Impact factor: 5.364

Review 10.  Magnetic resonance coronary angiography: where are we today?

Authors:  Amedeo Chiribiri; Rene M Botnar; Eike Nagel
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 2.931

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.