Literature DB >> 16705632

Autocalibrated coil sensitivity estimation for parallel imaging.

Mark A Griswold1, Felix Breuer, Martin Blaimer, Stephan Kannengiesser, Robin M Heidemann, Matthias Mueller, Mathias Nittka, Vladimir Jellus, Berthold Kiefer, Peter M Jakob.   

Abstract

Parallel imaging has proven to be a robust solution to the problem of acquisition speed in MRI. These methods are based on extracting spatial information from an array of multiple surface coils in order to speed up image acquisition. One of the most essential elements of any parallel imaging method is the information describing the coil sensitivity distribution throughout the sample. This paper covers some of the advanced methods to obtain coil sensitivity-related information, focusing particularly on the class of methods referred to as autocalibrating. These methods all acquire the data for coil sensitivity estimation directly before, during or directly after the reduced data acquisition. After a review of standard methods for coil sensitivity estimation, some of the basic and advanced autocalibrating methods are reviewed, and some example applications shown. Copyright (c) 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16705632     DOI: 10.1002/nbm.1048

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  NMR Biomed        ISSN: 0952-3480            Impact factor:   4.044


  19 in total

1.  Derivative encoding for parallel magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Jun Shen
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Parallel imaging reconstruction for arbitrary trajectories using k-space sparse matrices (kSPA).

Authors:  Chunlei Liu; Roland Bammer; Michael E Moseley
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 4.668

3.  Comparison of reconstruction accuracy and efficiency among autocalibrating data-driven parallel imaging methods.

Authors:  Anja C S Brau; Philip J Beatty; Stefan Skare; Roland Bammer
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 4.668

4.  Contrast-enhanced whole-heart coronary magnetic resonance angiography at 3 T using interleaved echo planar imaging.

Authors:  Himanshu Bhat; Qi Yang; Sven Zuehlsdorff; Kuncheng Li; Debiao Li
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 6.016

5.  Image quality improvement of composed whole-spine MR images by applying a modified homomorphic filter--first results in cases of multiple myeloma.

Authors:  M P Lichy; C Mueller-Horvat; V Jellus; W Horger; M Horger; C Pfannenberg; B Kiefer; C D Claussen; H P Schlemmer
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2008-05-29       Impact factor: 5.315

6.  Parallel reconstruction using null operations.

Authors:  Jian Zhang; Chunlei Liu; Michael E Moseley
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2011-05-20       Impact factor: 4.668

7.  DISTORTION-OPTIMAL SELF-CALIBRATING PARALLEL MRI BY BLIND INTERPOLATION IN SUBSAMPLED FILTER BANKS.

Authors:  Behzad Sharif; Yoram Bresler
Journal:  Proc IEEE Int Symp Biomed Imaging       Date:  2011-04-02

Review 8.  Tradeoffs in pushing the spatial resolution of fMRI for the 7T Human Connectome Project.

Authors:  An T Vu; Keith Jamison; Matthew F Glasser; Stephen M Smith; Timothy Coalson; Steen Moeller; Edward J Auerbach; Kamil Uğurbil; Essa Yacoub
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2016-11-25       Impact factor: 6.556

9.  Dynamic 2D self-phase-map Nyquist ghost correction for simultaneous multi-slice echo planar imaging.

Authors:  Uten Yarach; Yi-Hang Tung; Kawin Setsompop; Myung-Ho In; Itthi Chatnuntawech; Renat Yakupov; Frank Godenschweger; Oliver Speck
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2018-02-09       Impact factor: 4.668

10.  Model-based iterative reconstruction for single-shot EPI at 7T.

Authors:  Uten Yarach; Myung-Ho In; Itthi Chatnuntawech; Berkin Bilgic; Frank Godenschweger; Hendrik Mattern; Alessandro Sciarra; Oliver Speck
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2017-02-10       Impact factor: 4.668

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.