Kosuke Morita1, Takeshi Nakaura2,3, Masami Yoneyama4, Yasunori Nagayama5, Masafumi Kidoh5, Hiroyuki Uetani5, Osamu Ikeda5, Yasuyuki Yamashita5, Toshinori Hirai5. 1. Department of Radiology, Kumamoto University Hospital, 1-1-1 Honjo, Chuo-ku, Kumamoto-shi, Kumamoto, 860-8556, Japan. 2. Department of Radiology, Kumamoto University Hospital, 1-1-1 Honjo, Chuo-ku, Kumamoto-shi, Kumamoto, 860-8556, Japan. kff00712@nifty.com. 3. Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kumamoto University, Kumamoto, Japan. kff00712@nifty.com. 4. Philips Japan, 13-37, Kohnan 2-chome, Tokyo, Japan. 5. Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kumamoto University, Kumamoto, Japan.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to investigate the feasibility of non-contrast renal MRA using multi-shot gradient echo planar imaging (MSG-EPI) with a 3-T MRI system. METHODS: Seventeen healthy volunteers underwent non-contrast renal MRA using MSG-EPI and balanced steady-state free precession (b-SSFP) sequences on a 3-T MRI system. Two radiologists independently recorded the images' contrast, noise, sharpness, artifacts, and overall quality on 4-point scales. The signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) for the renal artery, the contrast ratio (CR) between the renal artery and erector spinae, and acquisition time were compared between the two sequences. RESULTS: The SNR and CR were significantly higher with MSG-EPI than with the b-SSFP sequence (17.80 ± 3.67 vs. 10.84 ± 2.86 and 0.77 ± 0.05 and 0.66 ± 0.09, respectively; p < 0.05), and the acquisition time was significantly lower (164.5 ± 34.0 vs. 261.5 ± 39.3 s, respectively; p < 0.05). There were significant differences in image contrast, noise, sharpness, artifacts, and overall image quality between the two sequences (p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: The MSG-EPI sequence is a promising technique that can shorten the scan time and improve the image quality of non-contrast renal MRA with a 3-T MRI system. KEY POINTS: • The multi-shot gradient echo planar imaging with an inversion pulse is a brand-new fast scan technique for an unenhanced renal MRA. • The image quality of multi-shot gradient echo planar imaging is better than that of b-SSFP for an unenhanced renal MRA.
OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to investigate the feasibility of non-contrast renal MRA using multi-shot gradient echo planar imaging (MSG-EPI) with a 3-T MRI system. METHODS: Seventeen healthy volunteers underwent non-contrast renal MRA using MSG-EPI and balanced steady-state free precession (b-SSFP) sequences on a 3-T MRI system. Two radiologists independently recorded the images' contrast, noise, sharpness, artifacts, and overall quality on 4-point scales. The signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) for the renal artery, the contrast ratio (CR) between the renal artery and erector spinae, and acquisition time were compared between the two sequences. RESULTS: The SNR and CR were significantly higher with MSG-EPI than with the b-SSFP sequence (17.80 ± 3.67 vs. 10.84 ± 2.86 and 0.77 ± 0.05 and 0.66 ± 0.09, respectively; p < 0.05), and the acquisition time was significantly lower (164.5 ± 34.0 vs. 261.5 ± 39.3 s, respectively; p < 0.05). There were significant differences in image contrast, noise, sharpness, artifacts, and overall image quality between the two sequences (p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: The MSG-EPI sequence is a promising technique that can shorten the scan time and improve the image quality of non-contrast renal MRA with a 3-T MRI system. KEY POINTS: • The multi-shot gradient echo planar imaging with an inversion pulse is a brand-new fast scan technique for an unenhanced renal MRA. • The image quality of multi-shot gradient echo planar imaging is better than that of b-SSFP for an unenhanced renal MRA.
Authors: Jeffrey H Maki; Gregory J Wilson; William B Eubank; David J Glickerman; Juan A Millan; Romhild M Hoogeveen Journal: AJR Am J Roentgenol Date: 2007-06 Impact factor: 3.959
Authors: Randall B Stafford; Mohammad Sabati; Michael J Haakstad; Houman Mahallati; Richard Frayne Journal: AJR Am J Roentgenol Date: 2008-07 Impact factor: 3.959
Authors: M R Prince; D L Narasimham; J C Stanley; T L Chenevert; D M Williams; M V Marx; K J Cho Journal: Radiology Date: 1995-12 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Christoph U Herborn; David M Watkins; Val M Runge; Jilene M Gendron; Mark L Montgomery; L Gill Naul Journal: Radiology Date: 2006-02-21 Impact factor: 11.105