Literature DB >> 20443035

A comprehensive in vitro study of image accuracy and quality for periodontal diagnosis. Part 1: the influence of X-ray generator on periodontal measurements using conventional and digital receptors.

Bart Vandenberghe1, Livia Corpas, Hilde Bosmans, Jie Yang, Reinhilde Jacobs.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was the determination of image accuracy and quality for periodontal diagnosis using various X-ray generators with conventional and digital radiographs. Thirty-one in vitro periodontal defects were evaluated on intraoral conventional (E-, F/E-speed) and digital images (three indirect, two direct sensors). Standardised radiographs were made with an alternating current (AC), a high-frequency (HF) and a direct current (DC) X-ray unit at rising exposure times (20-160 ms with 20-ms interval) with a constant kV of 70. Three observers assessed bone levels for comparison to the gold standard. Lamina dura, contrast, trabecularisation, crater and furcation involvements were evaluated. Irrespective X-ray generator-type, measurement deviations increased at higher exposure times for solid-state, but decreased for photostimulable storage phosphor (PSP) systems. Accuracy for HF or DC was significantly higher than AC (p < 0.0001), especially at low exposure times. At 0.5- to 1-mm clinical deviation, 27-53% and 32-55% dose savings were demonstrated when using HF or DC generators compared to AC, but only for PSP. No savings were found for solid-state sensors, indicating their higher sensitivity. The use of digital sensors compared to film allowed 15-90% dose savings using the AC tube, whilst solid-state sensors allowed approximately 50% savings compared to PSP, depending on tube type and threshold level.. Accuracy of periodontal diagnosis increases when using HF or DC generators and/or digital receptors with adequate diagnostic information at lower exposure times.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20443035     DOI: 10.1007/s00784-010-0416-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Oral Investig        ISSN: 1432-6981            Impact factor:   3.573


  34 in total

1.  Principles of digital imaging.

Authors:  P F van der Stelt
Journal:  Dent Clin North Am       Date:  2000-04

Review 2.  Radiographic and digital imaging in periodontal practice.

Authors:  E Hausmann
Journal:  J Periodontol       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 6.993

3.  Effects of different exposure values on diagnostic accuracy of digital images.

Authors:  P Pfeiffer; P Schmage; I Nergiz; U Platzer
Journal:  Quintessence Int       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 1.677

4.  Digital radiography of interproximal bone loss; validity of different filters.

Authors:  P Eickholz; T Riess; M Lenhard; S Hassfeld; H J Staehle
Journal:  J Clin Periodontol       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 8.728

5.  The dynamic range of digital radiographic systems: dose reduction or risk of overexposure?

Authors:  W E R Berkhout; D A Beuger; G C H Sanderink; P F van der Stelt
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 2.419

6.  Effective dose from cone beam CT examinations in dentistry.

Authors:  J A Roberts; N A Drage; J Davies; D W Thomas
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2008-10-13       Impact factor: 3.039

7.  The imaging performance of a storage phosphor system for dental radiography.

Authors:  D S Brettle; A Workman; R P Ellwood; J H Launders; K Horner; R M Davies
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 3.039

8.  The Intrex--a constant-potential x-ray unit for periapical dental radiography.

Authors:  W D McDavid; U Welander; B K Pillai; C R Morris
Journal:  Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol       Date:  1982-04

9.  Intra-oral storage phosphor and conventional radiography in the assessment of alveolar bone structures.

Authors:  G Kaeppler; A Vogel; D Axmann-Krcmar
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 2.419

10.  In practice: how going digital will affect the dental office.

Authors:  Allan G Farman; Claudio M Levato; David Gane; William C Scarfe
Journal:  J Am Dent Assoc       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 3.634

View more
  2 in total

1.  A comprehensive in vitro study of image accuracy and quality for periodontal diagnosis. Part 2: the influence of intra-oral image receptor on periodontal measurements.

Authors:  Bart Vandenberghe; Hilde Bosmans; Jie Yang; Reinhilde Jacobs
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2010-05-12       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  The Effects on Absorbed Dose Distribution in Intraoral X-ray Imaging When Using Tube Voltages of 60 and 70 kV for Bitewing Imaging.

Authors:  Kristina Hellén-Halme; Mats Nilsson
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Res       Date:  2013-10-01
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.