Literature DB >> 10355620

Digital radiography of interproximal bone loss; validity of different filters.

P Eickholz1, T Riess, M Lenhard, S Hassfeld, H J Staehle.   

Abstract

The aim of the present study was to compare linear measurements of interproximal bone loss on digitized radiographic images after application of different filters to the gold standard of intrasurgical measurements. Immediately before surgery, 50 radiographs of 50 periodontally-diseased teeth exhibiting interproximal bone loss, were obtained by a standardized technique in 33 patients. Intrasurgically, the distances from the cementoenamel junction (CEJ) to the alveolar crest (AC) and from the CEJ to the deepest extension of the bony defect (BD) were assessed. All radiographs were digitized with a flatbed scanner (resolution: 600x1200 dpi). Using the FRIACOM-soft-ware, the linear distances CEJ to AC and CEJ to BD were measured at 50 interproximal lesions from the digitized but unchanged radiographic images and also after use of 7 different basic image-processing modes (enhancement of contrast [dynamics], inversion, high-pass, enhancement of gray-level differences, mean value, histogram correction, spreading of grey values) with 11-fold magnification. Neither the measurement of the distance CEJ to AC on the unchanged images nor assessments with any of the filters revealed significant differences from the gold standard. Multivariate analysis of variance showed the respective filter (p=0.009), intrasurgical and radiographic assessments (p<0.0001), to statistically significantly, influence the difference between intrasurgical and radiographic measurements of the distance CEJ to BD. The underestimation of the intra-surgically assessed distance CEJ to BD by radiographic measurements ranged from 0.3+/-2.0 to 0.8+/-1.9 mm. The filter "mean value" underestimated interproximal bone loss statistically significantly more than the digitized but unchanged radiograph (p=0.05). In this study, basic digital manipulations (filters) of radiographic images failed to result in statistically significantly more valid measurements of interproximal bone loss when compared to the unchanged but digitized images. All radiographic assessments on the digitized images except for use of one filter (mean value) came close to the intrasurgical gold standard.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10355620     DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-051x.1999.260506.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Periodontol        ISSN: 0303-6979            Impact factor:   8.728


  15 in total

1.  Evaluation of alveolar crest bone loss via premolar bitewing radiographs: presentation of a new method.

Authors:  Yaser Safi; Mahdi Kadkhodazadeh; Pooria Safai; Mohammad Esmaeelinejad; Nafiseh Shamloo
Journal:  J Periodontal Implant Sci       Date:  2014-10-29       Impact factor: 2.614

2.  Assessment of using digital manipulation tools for diagnosing mandibular radiolucent lesions.

Authors:  R Raitz; J N R Assunção Junior; M Fenyo-Pereira; L Correa; L P de Lima
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2011-11-24       Impact factor: 2.419

3.  Perception of anatomical structures in digitally filtered and conventional panoramic radiographs: a clinical evaluation.

Authors:  B G Baksi; E Alpöz; E Sogur; A Mert
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 2.419

4.  A comprehensive in vitro study of image accuracy and quality for periodontal diagnosis. Part 1: the influence of X-ray generator on periodontal measurements using conventional and digital receptors.

Authors:  Bart Vandenberghe; Livia Corpas; Hilde Bosmans; Jie Yang; Reinhilde Jacobs
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2010-05-05       Impact factor: 3.573

5.  A comprehensive in vitro study of image accuracy and quality for periodontal diagnosis. Part 2: the influence of intra-oral image receptor on periodontal measurements.

Authors:  Bart Vandenberghe; Hilde Bosmans; Jie Yang; Reinhilde Jacobs
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2010-05-12       Impact factor: 3.573

6.  Measurement accuracy and perceived quality of imaging systems for the evaluation of periodontal structures.

Authors:  B Güniz Baksi
Journal:  Odontology       Date:  2008-07-27       Impact factor: 2.634

7.  Ex vivo radiographic tooth length measurements with the reference sphere method (RSM).

Authors:  Felix Roeder; Dan Brüllmann; Bernd d'Hoedt; Ralf Schulze
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2009-10-15       Impact factor: 3.573

8.  Influence of individual brightness and contrast adjustment on accuracy of radiographic measurements of infrabony defects.

Authors:  D Tihanyi; I Gera; P Eickholz
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 2.419

9.  Assessment of periodontal bone level revisited: a controlled study on the diagnostic accuracy of clinical evaluation methods and intra-oral radiography.

Authors:  Véronique Christiaens; Hugo De Bruyn; Eric Thevissen; Sebastiaan Koole; Melissa Dierens; Jan Cosyn
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2017-05-26       Impact factor: 3.573

10.  Influence of image filters on the reproducibility measurements of alveolar bone loss.

Authors:  Wivian Eiras Garcia Wong Alves; Evelise Ono; Jefferson Luis Oshiro Tanaka; Titular Edmundo Medici Filho; Luiz César de Moraes; Mari Eli Leonelli de Moraes; Julio Cezar de Melo Castilho
Journal:  J Appl Oral Sci       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 2.698

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.