Literature DB >> 20461423

A comprehensive in vitro study of image accuracy and quality for periodontal diagnosis. Part 2: the influence of intra-oral image receptor on periodontal measurements.

Bart Vandenberghe1, Hilde Bosmans, Jie Yang, Reinhilde Jacobs.   

Abstract

The aim of the study was to determine the image receptors' influence on exposure levels, image accuracy, and quality for periodontal diagnosis. Periodontal defects from cadaver specimens were imaged using two intra-oral conventional films (E-, F/E-speed), four indirect receptors (Digora 8 bit, Vistascan 12 bit with/without filter, Vistascan 16 bit), and two solid-state sensors (Sigma 12 bit, VistaRay 14 bit) at rising exposure (20-160 ms). Three observers assessed the standardized radiographs for alveolar bone measurements (1,732, 31 sites) and for subjective rating of lamina dura, contrast, trabecularization, crater, and furcation involvements. The measurements were compared to the gold standard. For the imaging plates, highest measurement accuracy was found with Vistascan 16 bit (100% within 0.5 mm) and for solid-state sensors with VistaRay 14 bit (100%, 0.5 mm), although the latter are mostly not significantly different. Higher contrast resolution imaging plates require up to 50% less exposure time, but for solid-state sensors, the dose remains unchanged. For the latter, a higher bit depth does seem to provide more accurate depiction of the alveolar crest, counteracting blooming artifacts. The use of a dedicated periodontal filter contributes to higher accuracy at all exposure times (p < 0.05-0.0001). Accuracy of periodontal diagnosis increases with higher contrast resolution. Digital exposure levels are thus dependent of image receptor as well as X-ray generator.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20461423     DOI: 10.1007/s00784-010-0417-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Oral Investig        ISSN: 1432-6981            Impact factor:   3.573


  34 in total

Review 1.  Furcation diagnosis.

Authors:  H P Müller; T Eger
Journal:  J Clin Periodontol       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 8.728

2.  Digital radiography of interproximal bone loss; validity of different filters.

Authors:  P Eickholz; T Riess; M Lenhard; S Hassfeld; H J Staehle
Journal:  J Clin Periodontol       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 8.728

3.  The dynamic range of digital radiographic systems: dose reduction or risk of overexposure?

Authors:  W E R Berkhout; D A Beuger; G C H Sanderink; P F van der Stelt
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 2.419

4.  Influence of spatial resolution and bit depth on detection of small caries lesions with digital receptors.

Authors:  Ann Wenzel; Francisco Haiter-Neto; Erik Gotfredsen
Journal:  Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod       Date:  2006-08-02

5.  Three-dimensional imaging as a pre-operative tool in decision making for furcation surgery.

Authors:  Clemens Walter; Dogan Kaner; Dorothea C Berndt; Roland Weiger; Nicola U Zitzmann
Journal:  J Clin Periodontol       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 8.728

6.  Measurement accuracy and perceived quality of imaging systems for the evaluation of periodontal structures.

Authors:  B Güniz Baksi
Journal:  Odontology       Date:  2008-07-27       Impact factor: 2.634

7.  Effect of bit depth and kVp of digital radiography for detection of subtle differences.

Authors:  Min-Suk Heo; Da-Hye Choi; Erika Benavides; Kyung-Hoe Huh; Won-Jin Yi; Sam-Sun Lee; Soon-Chul Choi
Journal:  Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod       Date:  2009-03-09

8.  Effective dose from cone beam CT examinations in dentistry.

Authors:  J A Roberts; N A Drage; J Davies; D W Thomas
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2008-10-13       Impact factor: 3.039

9.  The imaging performance of a storage phosphor system for dental radiography.

Authors:  D S Brettle; A Workman; R P Ellwood; J H Launders; K Horner; R M Davies
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 3.039

10.  Intra-oral storage phosphor and conventional radiography in the assessment of alveolar bone structures.

Authors:  G Kaeppler; A Vogel; D Axmann-Krcmar
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 2.419

View more
  1 in total

1.  The Effects on Absorbed Dose Distribution in Intraoral X-ray Imaging When Using Tube Voltages of 60 and 70 kV for Bitewing Imaging.

Authors:  Kristina Hellén-Halme; Mats Nilsson
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Res       Date:  2013-10-01
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.