Literature DB >> 20419760

Model-based phase I designs incorporating toxicity and efficacy for single and dual agent drug combinations: methods and challenges.

Sumithra J Mandrekar1, Rui Qin, Daniel J Sargent.   

Abstract

Novel therapies are challenging the standards of drug development. Agents with specific biologic targets, unknown dose-efficacy curves, and limited toxicity mandate novel designs to identify biologically optimal doses. We review two model-based designs that utilize either a proportional odds model or a continuation ratio model to identify an optimal dose of a single or two-agent combination in a Phase I setting utilizing both toxicity and efficacy data. A continual reassessment method with straightforward dose selection criterion using accumulated data from all patients treated until that time point is employed while allowing for separate toxicity and efficacy curves for each drug in a two-drug setting. The simulation studies demonstrate considerable promise, at least theoretically, in the ability of such model-based designs to identify the optimal dose. Despite such favorable operating characteristics, there are several pragmatic challenges that hinder the routine implementation of such model-based designs in practice. We review and offer practical solutions to potentially overcome some of these challenges. The acceptance and integration of these designs in practice may be quicker and easier if they are developed in concert with a clinical paradigm.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20419760      PMCID: PMC2931331          DOI: 10.1002/sim.3706

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Med        ISSN: 0277-6715            Impact factor:   2.373


  21 in total

1.  Dose-finding designs for HIV studies.

Authors:  J O'Quigley; M D Hughes; T Fenton
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  Designs for single- or multiple-agent phase I trials.

Authors:  Mark R Conaway; Stephanie Dunbar; Shyamal D Peddada
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 2.571

3.  A new dose-finding design for bivariate outcomes.

Authors:  Anastasia Ivanova
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 2.571

4.  Recent developments in adaptive designs for Phase I/II dose-finding studies.

Authors:  Sarah Zohar; Sylvie Chevret
Journal:  J Biopharm Stat       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 1.051

5.  Continual reassessment method: a practical design for phase 1 clinical trials in cancer.

Authors:  J O'Quigley; M Pepe; L Fisher
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1990-03       Impact factor: 2.571

6.  Design and analysis of phase I clinical trials.

Authors:  B E Storer
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1989-09       Impact factor: 2.571

7.  Some practical improvements in the continual reassessment method for phase I studies.

Authors:  S N Goodman; M L Zahurak; S Piantadosi
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1995-06-15       Impact factor: 2.373

8.  A strategy for dose-finding and safety monitoring based on efficacy and adverse outcomes in phase I/II clinical trials.

Authors:  P F Thall; K E Russell
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 2.571

9.  Dose-finding based on efficacy-toxicity trade-offs.

Authors:  Peter F Thall; John D Cook
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 10.  Monoclonal antibodies as therapeutic agents for cancer.

Authors:  Marion Harris
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 41.316

View more
  14 in total

1.  A robust Bayesian dose-finding design for phase I/II clinical trials.

Authors:  Suyu Liu; Valen E Johnson
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2015-10-20       Impact factor: 5.899

Review 2.  The changing landscape of phase I trials in oncology.

Authors:  Kit Man Wong; Anna Capasso; S Gail Eckhardt
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-11-10       Impact factor: 66.675

3.  A trivariate continual reassessment method for phase I/II trials of toxicity, efficacy, and surrogate efficacy.

Authors:  Wei Zhong; Joseph S Koopmeiners; Bradley P Carlin
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2012-07-16       Impact factor: 2.373

4.  Adaptive designs for identifying optimal biological dose for molecularly targeted agents.

Authors:  Yong Zang; J Jack Lee; Ying Yuan
Journal:  Clin Trials       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 2.486

5.  Seamless Phase I/II Adaptive Design for Oncology Trials of Molecularly Targeted Agents.

Authors:  Nolan A Wages; Christopher Tait
Journal:  J Biopharm Stat       Date:  2014-06-06       Impact factor: 1.051

6.  All-comers versus enrichment design strategy in phase II trials.

Authors:  Sumithra J Mandrekar; Daniel J Sargent
Journal:  J Thorac Oncol       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 15.609

7.  Drug designs fulfilling the requirements of clinical trials aiming at personalizing medicine.

Authors:  Sumithra J Mandrekar; Daniel J Sargent
Journal:  Chin Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-06-01

Review 8.  Innovations for phase I dose-finding designs in pediatric oncology clinical trials.

Authors:  Adelaide Doussau; Birgit Geoerger; Irene Jiménez; Xavier Paoletti
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2016-01-26       Impact factor: 2.226

Review 9.  Adaptive designs for dual-agent phase I dose-escalation studies.

Authors:  Jennifer A Harrington; Graham M Wheeler; Michael J Sweeting; Adrian P Mander; Duncan I Jodrell
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2013-03-19       Impact factor: 66.675

10.  A phase I-II design based on periodic and continuous monitoring of disease status and the times to toxicity and death.

Authors:  Juhee Lee; Peter F Thall; Pavlos Msaouel
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2020-04-07       Impact factor: 2.497

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.