Literature DB >> 7667557

Some practical improvements in the continual reassessment method for phase I studies.

S N Goodman1, M L Zahurak, S Piantadosi.   

Abstract

The Continual Reassessment Method (CRM) is a Bayesian phase I design whose purpose is to estimate the maximum tolerated dose of a drug that will be used in subsequent phase II and III studies. Its acceptance has been hindered by the greater duration of CRM designs compared to standard methods, as well as by concerns with excessive experimentation at high dosage levels, and with more frequent and severe toxicity. This paper presents the results of a simulation study in which one assigns more than one subject at a time to each dose level, and each dose increase is limited to one level. We show that these modifications address all of the most serious criticisms of the CRM, reducing the duration of the trial by 50-67 per cent, reducing toxicity incidence by 20-35 per cent, and lowering toxicity severity. These are achieved with minimal effects on accuracy. Most important, based on our experience at our institution, such modifications make the CRM acceptable to clinical investigators.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7667557     DOI: 10.1002/sim.4780141102

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Med        ISSN: 0277-6715            Impact factor:   2.373


  99 in total

Review 1.  Learning from previous responses in phase I dose-escalation studies.

Authors:  J Whitehead; Y Zhou; N Stallard; S Todd; A Whitehead
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 4.335

Review 2.  The changing landscape of phase I trials in oncology.

Authors:  Kit Man Wong; Anna Capasso; S Gail Eckhardt
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-11-10       Impact factor: 66.675

3.  Integrating the escalation and dose expansion studies into a unified Phase I clinical trial.

Authors:  Alexia Iasonos; John O'Quigley
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2016-07-05       Impact factor: 2.226

4.  A new statistical method for dose-finding based on efficacy and toxicity in early phase clinical trials.

Authors:  P F Thall; E H Estey; H G Sung
Journal:  Invest New Drugs       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 3.850

Review 5.  Modelling and simulation in the development and use of anti-cancer agents: an underused tool?

Authors:  Ferdinand Rombout; Leon Aarons; Mats Karlsson; Anthony Man; France Mentré; Peter Nygren; Amy Racine; Hans Schaefer; Jean-Louis Steimer; Iñaki Troconiz; Achiel van Peer
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 2.745

6.  Phase I study of Navitoclax (ABT-263), a novel Bcl-2 family inhibitor, in patients with small-cell lung cancer and other solid tumors.

Authors:  Leena Gandhi; D Ross Camidge; Moacyr Ribeiro de Oliveira; Philip Bonomi; David Gandara; Divis Khaira; Christine L Hann; Evelyn M McKeegan; Elizabeth Litvinovich; Philip M Hemken; Caroline Dive; Sari H Enschede; Cathy Nolan; Yi-Lin Chiu; Todd Busman; Hao Xiong; Andrew P Krivoshik; Rod Humerickhouse; Geoffrey I Shapiro; Charles M Rudin
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-01-31       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  Dose Finding for Drug Combination in Early Cancer Phase I Trials using Conditional Continual Reassessment Method.

Authors:  Márcio Augusto Diniz; Mourad Tighiouart
Journal:  J Biom Biostat       Date:  2017-11-27

8.  A Generalized Continual Reassessment Method for Two-Agent Phase I Trials.

Authors:  Thomas M Braun; Nan Jia
Journal:  Stat Biopharm Res       Date:  2013-01-01       Impact factor: 1.452

9.  Dose intensification of busulfan in the preparative regimen is associated with improved survival: a phase I/II controlled, randomized study.

Authors:  Simrit Parmar; Gabriela Rondon; Marcos de Lima; Peter Thall; Ronald Bassett; Paolo Anderlini; Partow Kebriaei; Issa Khouri; Prasanth Ganesan; Richard Champlin; Sergio Giralt
Journal:  Biol Blood Marrow Transplant       Date:  2012-12-07       Impact factor: 5.742

10.  Final Results of the RHAPSODY Trial: A Multi-Center, Phase 2 Trial Using a Continual Reassessment Method to Determine the Safety and Tolerability of 3K3A-APC, A Recombinant Variant of Human Activated Protein C, in Combination with Tissue Plasminogen Activator, Mechanical Thrombectomy or both in Moderate to Severe Acute Ischemic Stroke.

Authors:  Patrick Lyden; Kent E Pryor; Christopher S Coffey; Merit Cudkowicz; Robin Conwit; Ashutosh Jadhav; Robert N Sawyer; Jan Claassen; Opeolu Adeoye; Shlee Song; Peter Hannon; Natalia S Rost; Archana Hinduja; Michel Torbey; Jin-Moo Lee; Curtis Benesch; Michael Rippee; Marilyn Rymer; Michael T Froehler; E Clarke Haley; Mark Johnson; Jon Yankey; Kim Magee; Julie Qidwai; Howard Levy; E Mark Haacke; Miller Fawaz; Thomas P Davis; Arthur W Toga; John H Griffin; Berislav V Zlokovic
Journal:  Ann Neurol       Date:  2019-01-07       Impact factor: 10.422

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.