Literature DB >> 24904956

Seamless Phase I/II Adaptive Design for Oncology Trials of Molecularly Targeted Agents.

Nolan A Wages1, Christopher Tait.   

Abstract

In dose-finding trials of chemotherapeutic agents, the goal of identifying the maximum tolerated dose is usually determined by considering information on toxicity only, with the assumption that the highest safe dose also provides the most promising outlook for efficacy. Trials of molecularly targeted agents challenge accepted dose-finding methods because minimal toxicity may arise over all doses under consideration and higher doses may not result in greater response. In this article, we propose a new early-phase method for trials investigating targeted agents. We provide simulation results illustrating the operating characteristics of our design.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Continual reassessment method; Dose finding; Molecularly targeted agent; Optimal biological dose

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24904956      PMCID: PMC4363077          DOI: 10.1080/10543406.2014.920873

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biopharm Stat        ISSN: 1054-3406            Impact factor:   1.051


  29 in total

1.  Retrospective robustness of the continual reassessment method.

Authors:  John O'Quigley; Sarah Zohar
Journal:  J Biopharm Stat       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 1.051

2.  Incorporating lower grade toxicity information into dose finding designs.

Authors:  Alexia Iasonos; Sarah Zohar; John O'Quigley
Journal:  Clin Trials       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 2.486

3.  Continual reassessment method: a likelihood approach.

Authors:  J O'Quigley; L Z Shen
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 2.571

4.  Continual reassessment method: a practical design for phase 1 clinical trials in cancer.

Authors:  J O'Quigley; M Pepe; L Fisher
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1990-03       Impact factor: 2.571

5.  Proportional odds model for dose-finding clinical trial designs with ordinal toxicity grading.

Authors:  Emily M Van Meter; Elizabeth Garrett-Mayer; Dipankar Bandyopadhyay
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2011-02-23       Impact factor: 2.373

6.  Design and analysis of phase I clinical trials.

Authors:  B E Storer
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1989-09       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 7.  Extended model-based designs for more complex dose-finding studies.

Authors:  John O'Quigley; Mark Conaway
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2011-02-24       Impact factor: 2.373

8.  Seamless phase I-II trial design for assessing toxicity and efficacy for targeted agents.

Authors:  Antje Hoering; Mike LeBlanc; John Crowley
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2010-12-06       Impact factor: 12.531

9.  A modified toxicity probability interval method for dose-finding trials.

Authors:  Yuan Ji; Ping Liu; Yisheng Li; B Nebiyou Bekele
Journal:  Clin Trials       Date:  2010-10-08       Impact factor: 2.486

10.  Model-based phase I designs incorporating toxicity and efficacy for single and dual agent drug combinations: methods and challenges.

Authors:  Sumithra J Mandrekar; Rui Qin; Daniel J Sargent
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2010-05-10       Impact factor: 2.373

View more
  22 in total

1.  Performance of toxicity probability interval based designs in contrast to the continual reassessment method.

Authors:  Bethany Jablonski Horton; Nolan A Wages; Mark R Conaway
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2016-07-19       Impact factor: 2.373

2.  Flexible Phase I-II design for partially ordered regimens with application to therapeutic cancer vaccines.

Authors:  Nolan A Wages; Craig L Slingluff
Journal:  Stat Biosci       Date:  2019-06-04

3.  Cumulative Toxicity in Targeted Therapies: What to Expect at the Recommended Phase II Dose.

Authors:  Maria-Athina Altzerinakou; Laurence Collette; Xavier Paoletti
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2019-11-01       Impact factor: 13.506

4.  A Phase I/II adaptive design to determine the optimal treatment regimen from a set of combination immunotherapies in high-risk melanoma.

Authors:  Nolan A Wages; Craig L Slingluff; Gina R Petroni
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2015-01-29       Impact factor: 2.226

5.  One Size Fits All?: Ethical Considerations for Examining Efficacy in First-in-Human Pluripotent Stem Cell Studies.

Authors:  Michelle Gjl Habets; Johannes Jm van Delden; Sophie L Niemansburg; Harold L Atkins; Annelien L Bredenoord
Journal:  Mol Ther       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 11.454

6.  A Phase I/II adaptive design for heterogeneous groups with application to a stereotactic body radiation therapy trial.

Authors:  Nolan A Wages; Paul W Read; Gina R Petroni
Journal:  Pharm Stat       Date:  2015-05-11       Impact factor: 1.894

7.  The Impact of Early-Phase Trial Design in the Drug Development Process.

Authors:  Mark R Conaway; Gina R Petroni
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2018-10-16       Impact factor: 12.531

8.  A latent variable model for improving inference in trials assessing the effect of dose on toxicity and composite efficacy endpoints.

Authors:  James Ms Wason; Shaun R Seaman
Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res       Date:  2019-02-25       Impact factor: 3.021

9.  Generalization of the time-to-event continual reassessment method to bivariate outcomes.

Authors:  Donglin Yan; Christopher Tait; Nolan A Wages; Tamila Kindwall-Keller; Emily V Dressler
Journal:  J Biopharm Stat       Date:  2019-07-02       Impact factor: 1.051

10.  Designing Dose-Finding Phase I Clinical Trials: Top 10 Questions That Should Be Discussed With Your Statistician.

Authors:  Shing M Lee; Nolan A Wages; Karyn A Goodman; A Craig Lockhart
Journal:  JCO Precis Oncol       Date:  2021-02-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.