Literature DB >> 15339291

Dose-finding based on efficacy-toxicity trade-offs.

Peter F Thall1, John D Cook.   

Abstract

We present an adaptive Bayesian method for dose-finding in phase I/II clinical trials based on trade-offs between the probabilities of treatment efficacy and toxicity. The method accommodates either trinary or bivariate binary outcomes, as well as efficacy probabilities that possibly are nonmonotone in dose. Doses are selected for successive patient cohorts based on a set of efficacy-toxicity trade-off contours that partition the two-dimensional outcome probability domain. Priors are established by solving for hyperparameters that optimize the fit of the model to elicited mean outcome probabilities. For trinary outcomes, the new algorithm is compared to the method of Thall and Russell (1998, Biometrics 54, 251-264) by application to a trial of rapid treatment for ischemic stroke. The bivariate binary outcome case is illustrated by a trial of graft-versus-host disease treatment in allogeneic bone marrow transplantation. Computer simulations show that, under a wide rage of dose-outcome scenarios, the new method has high probabilities of making correct decisions and treats most patients at doses with desirable efficacy-toxicity trade-offs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15339291     DOI: 10.1111/j.0006-341X.2004.00218.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biometrics        ISSN: 0006-341X            Impact factor:   2.571


  131 in total

Review 1.  Current challenges for the early clinical development of anticancer drugs in the era of molecularly targeted agents.

Authors:  Christophe Le Tourneau; Véronique Diéras; Patricia Tresca; Wulfran Cacheux; Xavier Paoletti
Journal:  Target Oncol       Date:  2010-04-02       Impact factor: 4.493

2.  Bayesian phase II adaptive randomization by jointly modeling time-to-event efficacy and binary toxicity.

Authors:  Xiudong Lei; Ying Yuan; Guosheng Yin
Journal:  Lifetime Data Anal       Date:  2010-04-03       Impact factor: 1.588

3.  A robust Bayesian dose-finding design for phase I/II clinical trials.

Authors:  Suyu Liu; Valen E Johnson
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2015-10-20       Impact factor: 5.899

Review 4.  The changing landscape of phase I trials in oncology.

Authors:  Kit Man Wong; Anna Capasso; S Gail Eckhardt
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-11-10       Impact factor: 66.675

5.  A decision-theoretic phase I-II design for ordinal outcomes in two cycles.

Authors:  Juhee Lee; Peter F Thall; Yuan Ji; Peter Müller
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2015-11-09       Impact factor: 5.899

6.  Phase I/II trial of lenalidomide and high-dose melphalan with autologous stem cell transplantation for relapsed myeloma.

Authors:  N Shah; P F Thall; P S Fox; Q Bashir; J J Shah; S Parmar; P Lin; P Kebriaei; Y Nieto; U R Popat; C M Hosing; A Cornelison; E J Shpall; R Z Orlowski; R E Champlin; M H Qazilbash
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  2015-02-27       Impact factor: 11.528

Review 7.  Statistical issues in clinical trial design.

Authors:  Kenneth R Hess
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 5.075

Review 8.  A review of phase 2-3 clinical trial designs.

Authors:  Peter F Thall
Journal:  Lifetime Data Anal       Date:  2007-09-02       Impact factor: 1.588

Review 9.  Adaptive designs for randomized trials in public health.

Authors:  C Hendricks Brown; Thomas R Ten Have; Booil Jo; Getachew Dagne; Peter A Wyman; Bengt Muthén; Robert D Gibbons
Journal:  Annu Rev Public Health       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 21.981

10.  Dose--schedule finding in phase I/II clinical trials using a Bayesian isotonic transformation.

Authors:  Yisheng Li; B Nebiyou Bekele; Yuan Ji; John D Cook
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2008-10-30       Impact factor: 2.373

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.