Literature DB >> 23507740

Adaptive designs for dual-agent phase I dose-escalation studies.

Jennifer A Harrington1, Graham M Wheeler, Michael J Sweeting, Adrian P Mander, Duncan I Jodrell.   

Abstract

Anticancer agents used in combination are fundamental to successful cancer treatment, particularly in a curative setting. For dual-agent phase I trials, the goal is to identify drug doses and schedules for further clinical testing. However, current methods for establishing the recommended phase II dose for agents in combination can fail to fully explore drug interactions. With increasing numbers of anticancer drugs requiring testing, new adaptive model-based trial designs that improve on current practice have been proposed, although uptake has been minimal. We describe the methods available and discuss some of the opportunities and challenges faced in dual-agent phase I trials, as well as giving examples of trials in which adaptive designs have been implemented successfully. Improving the design and execution of phase I trials of drug combinations critically relies on collaboration between the statistical and clinical communities to facilitate the implementation of adaptive, model-based designs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23507740     DOI: 10.1038/nrclinonc.2013.35

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol        ISSN: 1759-4774            Impact factor:   66.675


  69 in total

Review 1.  Competing designs for phase I clinical trials: a review.

Authors:  William F Rosenberger; Linda M Haines
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2002-09-30       Impact factor: 2.373

2.  A parallel phase I/II clinical trial design for combination therapies.

Authors:  Xuelin Huang; Swati Biswas; Yasuhiro Oki; Jean-Pierre Issa; Donald A Berry
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 2.571

3.  Model-guided determination of maximum tolerated dose in phase I clinical trials: evidence for increased precision.

Authors:  R Mick; M J Ratain
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1993-02-03       Impact factor: 13.506

4.  Some practical improvements in the continual reassessment method for phase I studies.

Authors:  S N Goodman; M L Zahurak; S Piantadosi
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1995-06-15       Impact factor: 2.373

5.  Phase I study of continuous MKC-1 in patients with advanced or metastatic solid malignancies using the modified Time-to-Event Continual Reassessment Method (TITE-CRM) dose escalation design.

Authors:  Amye Tevaarwerk; George Wilding; Jens Eickhoff; Rick Chappell; Carolyn Sidor; Jamie Arnott; Howard Bailey; William Schelman; Glenn Liu
Journal:  Invest New Drugs       Date:  2011-01-12       Impact factor: 3.850

6.  Designing dose-escalation trials with late-onset toxicities using the time-to-event continual reassessment method.

Authors:  Daniel Normolle; Theodore Lawrence
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2006-09-20       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  A novel Phase I/IIa design for early phase oncology studies and its application in the evaluation of MK-0752 in pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  John Whitehead; Helene Thygesen; Thomas Jaki; Scot Davies; Sarah Halford; Helen Turner; Natalie Cook; Duncan Jodrell
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2012-04-11       Impact factor: 2.373

Review 8.  Curing metastatic cancer: lessons from testicular germ-cell tumours.

Authors:  John R W Masters; Beate Köberle
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 60.716

9.  The continual reassessment method for multiple toxicity grades: a Bayesian quasi-likelihood approach.

Authors:  Z Yuan; R Chappell; H Bailey
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 2.571

10.  Bayesian clinical trials at the University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center.

Authors:  Swati Biswas; Diane D Liu; J Jack Lee; Donald A Berry
Journal:  Clin Trials       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 2.486

View more
  20 in total

Review 1.  The changing landscape of phase I trials in oncology.

Authors:  Kit Man Wong; Anna Capasso; S Gail Eckhardt
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-11-10       Impact factor: 66.675

2.  Identifying a maximum tolerated contour in two-dimensional dose finding.

Authors:  Nolan A Wages
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2016-02-22       Impact factor: 2.373

3.  A Bayesian model-free approach to combination therapy phase I trials using censored time-to-toxicity data.

Authors:  Graham M Wheeler; Michael J Sweeting; Adrian P Mander
Journal:  J R Stat Soc Ser C Appl Stat       Date:  2018-11-22       Impact factor: 1.864

4.  A comparative study of adaptive dose-finding designs for phase I oncology trials of combination therapies.

Authors:  Akihiro Hirakawa; Nolan A Wages; Hiroyuki Sato; Shigeyuki Matsui
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2015-05-13       Impact factor: 2.373

Review 5.  Design of phase I combination trials: recommendations of the Clinical Trial Design Task Force of the NCI Investigational Drug Steering Committee.

Authors:  Channing J Paller; Penelope A Bradbury; S Percy Ivy; Lesley Seymour; Patricia M LoRusso; Laurence Baker; Larry Rubinstein; Erich Huang; Deborah Collyar; Susan Groshen; Steven Reeves; Lee M Ellis; Daniel J Sargent; Gary L Rosner; Michael L LeBlanc; Mark J Ratain
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2014-08-15       Impact factor: 12.531

6.  Model-Based Adaptive Optimal Design (MBAOD) Improves Combination Dose Finding Designs: an Example in Oncology.

Authors:  Philippe B Pierrillas; Sylvain Fouliard; Marylore Chenel; Andrew C Hooker; Lena E Friberg; Mats O Karlsson
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2018-03-07       Impact factor: 4.009

Review 7.  Practical designs for Phase I combination studies in oncology.

Authors:  Nolan A Wages; Anastasia Ivanova; Olga Marchenko
Journal:  J Biopharm Stat       Date:  2016       Impact factor: 1.051

Review 8.  The performance of model-based versus rule-based phase I clinical trials in oncology : A quantitative comparison of the performance of model-based versus rule-based phase I trials with molecularly targeted anticancer drugs over the last 2 years.

Authors:  E M J van Brummelen; A D R Huitema; E van Werkhoven; J H Beijnen; J H M Schellens
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn       Date:  2016-03-10       Impact factor: 2.745

9.  From Famine to Feast: Developing Early-Phase Combination Immunotherapy Trials Wisely.

Authors:  Daphne Day; Arta M Monjazeb; Elad Sharon; S Percy Ivy; Eric H Rubin; Gary L Rosner; Marcus O Butler
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2017-09-01       Impact factor: 12.531

10.  Proportion of Patients in Phase I Oncology Trials Receiving Treatments That Are Ultimately Approved.

Authors:  Sean X Zhang; Dean Fergusson; Jonathan Kimmelman
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2020-09-01       Impact factor: 13.506

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.