Literature DB >> 26825023

Innovations for phase I dose-finding designs in pediatric oncology clinical trials.

Adelaide Doussau1, Birgit Geoerger2, Irene Jiménez3, Xavier Paoletti4.   

Abstract

Phase I oncology clinical trials are designed to identify the optimal dose that will be recommended for phase II trials. In pediatric oncology, the conduct of those trials raises specific challenges, as the disease is rare with limited therapeutic options. In addition, the tolerance profile is known from adult trials. This paper provides a review of the major recent developments in the design of these trials, inspired by the need to cope with the specific challenges of dose finding in cancer pediatric oncology. We reviewed simulation studies comparing designs dedicated to address these challenges. We also reviewed the design used in published dose-finding trials in pediatric oncology over the period 2009-2014. Three main fields of innovation were identified. First, designs that were developed in order to relax the rules for more flexible inclusions. Second, methods to incorporate data emerging from adult studies. Third, designs accounting for toxicity evaluation at repeated cycles in pediatric oncology. In addition to this overview, we propose some further directions for designing pediatric dose-finding trials. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adaptive designs; Dose-finding clinical trials; Oncology; Pediatrics; Phase I; Review

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26825023      PMCID: PMC4818190          DOI: 10.1016/j.cct.2016.01.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials        ISSN: 1551-7144            Impact factor:   2.226


  55 in total

1.  A simulation-based comparison of the traditional method, Rolling-6 design and a frequentist version of the continual reassessment method with special attention to trial duration in pediatric Phase I oncology trials.

Authors:  Arzu Onar-Thomas; Zang Xiong
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2010-03-15       Impact factor: 2.226

2.  Bayesian dose escalation in oncology with sharing of information between patient populations.

Authors:  Kristine R Broglio; Larissa Sandalic; Tina Albertson; Scott M Berry
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2015-07-11       Impact factor: 2.226

3.  Phase I trials of molecularly targeted agents: should we pay more attention to late toxicities?

Authors:  Sophie Postel-Vinay; Carlos Gomez-Roca; L Rhoda Molife; Bhavesh Anghan; Antonin Levy; Ian Judson; Johann De Bono; Jean-Charles Soria; Stan Kaye; Xavier Paoletti
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-03-28       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 4.  Pediatric drug development: a perspective from the Cancer Therapy Evaluation Program (CTEP) of the National Cancer Institute (NCI).

Authors:  M Smith; P T Ho
Journal:  Invest New Drugs       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 3.850

5.  A comparative analysis of paediatric dose-finding trials of molecularly targeted agent with adults' trials.

Authors:  Xavier Paoletti; Birgit Geoerger; François Doz; André Baruchel; François Lokiec; Christophe Le Tourneau
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2013-03-27       Impact factor: 9.162

6.  A strategy for dose-finding and safety monitoring based on efficacy and adverse outcomes in phase I/II clinical trials.

Authors:  P F Thall; K E Russell
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 2.571

7.  Adaptive Phase I clinical trial design using Markov models for conditional probability of toxicity.

Authors:  Laura L Fernandes; Jeremy M G Taylor; Susan Murray
Journal:  J Biopharm Stat       Date:  2015-06-22       Impact factor: 1.051

8.  Cancer phase I clinical trials: efficient dose escalation with overdose control.

Authors:  J Babb; A Rogatko; S Zacks
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1998-05-30       Impact factor: 2.373

9.  Considerations in the design of clinical trials for pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

Authors:  Meenakshi Devidas; James R Anderson
Journal:  Clin Investig (Lond)       Date:  2013-09

10.  Choosing marginal or random-effects models for longitudinal binary responses: application to self-reported disability among older persons.

Authors:  Isabelle Carrière; Jean Bouyer
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2002-12-05       Impact factor: 4.615

View more
  12 in total

Review 1.  Early phase clinical trials of anticancer agents in children and adolescents - an ITCC perspective.

Authors:  Lucas Moreno; Andrew D J Pearson; Xavier Paoletti; Irene Jimenez; Birgit Geoerger; Pamela R Kearns; C Michel Zwaan; Francois Doz; Andre Baruchel; Josef Vormoor; Michela Casanova; Stefan M Pfister; Bruce Morland; Gilles Vassal
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2017-05-16       Impact factor: 66.675

Review 2.  Design and conduct of early phase drug studies in children: challenges and opportunities.

Authors:  Michael Rieder; Daniel Hawcutt
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2016-08-08       Impact factor: 4.335

3.  Landscape of phase 1 clinical trials for minors with cancer in the United States.

Authors:  Jaclynne H Nader; Dylan V Neel; David S Shulman; Clement Ma; Florence Bourgeois; Steven G DuBois
Journal:  Pediatr Blood Cancer       Date:  2020-09-04       Impact factor: 3.167

4.  Time-to-Event Bayesian Optimal Interval Design to Accelerate Phase I Trials.

Authors:  Ying Yuan; Ruitao Lin; Daniel Li; Lei Nie; Katherine E Warren
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2018-05-16       Impact factor: 12.531

Review 5.  Opportunities and Challenges in Drug Development for Pediatric Cancers.

Authors:  Theodore W Laetsch; Steven G DuBois; Julia Glade Bender; Margaret E Macy; Lucas Moreno
Journal:  Cancer Discov       Date:  2020-12-04       Impact factor: 38.272

6.  Risk and surrogate benefit for pediatric Phase I trials in oncology: A systematic review with meta-analysis.

Authors:  Marcin Waligora; Malgorzata M Bala; Magdalena Koperny; Mateusz T Wasylewski; Karolina Strzebonska; Rafał R Jaeschke; Agnieszka Wozniak; Jan Piasecki; Agnieszka Sliwka; Jerzy W Mitus; Maciej Polak; Dominika Nowis; Dean Fergusson; Jonathan Kimmelman
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2018-02-20       Impact factor: 11.069

7.  Unified approach for extrapolation and bridging of adult information in early-phase dose-finding paediatric studies.

Authors:  Caroline Petit; Adeline Samson; Satoshi Morita; Moreno Ursino; Jérémie Guedj; Vincent Jullien; Emmanuelle Comets; Sarah Zohar
Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res       Date:  2016-10-05       Impact factor: 3.021

8.  Comparison of Clinical Characteristics Between Clinical Trial Participants and Nonparticipants Using Electronic Health Record Data.

Authors:  James R Rogers; Cong Liu; George Hripcsak; Ying Kuen Cheung; Chunhua Weng
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2021-04-01

Review 9.  Navigating the Regulatory Landscape to Develop Pediatric Oncology Drugs: Expert Opinion Recommendations.

Authors:  Elly Barry; Darrin Beaupre; Eileen Blasi; Jaimie A Walsh; Scott L Weinrich; Daniel R Arenson; Ira A Jacobs
Journal:  Paediatr Drugs       Date:  2021-06-26       Impact factor: 3.022

Review 10.  Practical considerations for the implementation of adaptive designs for oncology Phase I dose-finding trials.

Authors:  Lai Wei; Xueliang Pan; Soledad Fernandez
Journal:  Future Drug Discov       Date:  2019-10-11
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.