Literature DB >> 26552953

The changing landscape of phase I trials in oncology.

Kit Man Wong1, Anna Capasso1, S Gail Eckhardt1.   

Abstract

Advances in our knowledge of the molecular pathogenesis of cancer have led to increased interest in molecularly targeted agents (MTAs), which target specific oncogenic drivers and are now a major focus of cancer drug development. MTAs differ from traditional cytotoxic agents in various aspects, including their toxicity profiles and the potential availability of predictive biomarkers of response. The landscape of phase I oncology trials is evolving to adapt to these novel therapies and to improve the efficiency of drug development. In this Review, we discuss new strategies used in phase I trial design, such as novel dose-escalation schemes to circumvent limitations of the classic 3 + 3 design and enable faster dose escalation and/or more-precise dose determinations using statistical modelling; improved selection of patients based on genetic or molecular biomarkers; pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic analyses; and the early evaluation of efficacy - in addition to safety. Indeed, new expedited approval pathways that can accelerate drug development require demonstration of efficacy in early phase trials. The application of molecular tumour profiling for matched therapy and the testing of drug combinations based on a strong biological rationale are also increasingly seen in phase I studies. Finally, the shift towards multi-institutional trials and centralized study management results in consequent implications for institutions and investigators. These issues are also highlighted herein.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26552953     DOI: 10.1038/nrclinonc.2015.194

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol        ISSN: 1759-4774            Impact factor:   66.675


  126 in total

Review 1.  Molecular prescreening to select patient population in early clinical trials.

Authors:  Jordi Rodón; Cristina Saura; Rodrigo Dienstmann; Ana Vivancos; Santiago Ramón y Cajal; José Baselga; Josep Tabernero
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-04-03       Impact factor: 66.675

2.  Incorporating lower grade toxicity information into dose finding designs.

Authors:  Alexia Iasonos; Sarah Zohar; John O'Quigley
Journal:  Clin Trials       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 2.486

3.  Safety and activity of alectinib against systemic disease and brain metastases in patients with crizotinib-resistant ALK-rearranged non-small-cell lung cancer (AF-002JG): results from the dose-finding portion of a phase 1/2 study.

Authors:  Shirish M Gadgeel; Leena Gandhi; Gregory J Riely; Alberto A Chiappori; Howard L West; Michele C Azada; Peter N Morcos; Ruey-Min Lee; Linta Garcia; Li Yu; Frederic Boisserie; Laura Di Laurenzio; Sophie Golding; Jotaro Sato; Shumpei Yokoyama; Tomohiro Tanaka; Sai-Hong Ignatius Ou
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2014-08-18       Impact factor: 41.316

4.  Challenges and pitfalls of combining targeted agents in phase I studies.

Authors:  Stephen A Cannistra
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2008-08-01       Impact factor: 44.544

5.  NCI-MATCH launch highlights new trial design in precision-medicine era.

Authors:  Caroline McNeil
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2015-07-03       Impact factor: 13.506

Review 6.  Personalized oncology: genomic screening in phase 1.

Authors:  Ida Viller Tuxen; Lars Jønson; Eric Santoni-Rugiu; Jane Preuss Hasselby; Finn Cilius Nielsen; Ulrik Lassen
Journal:  APMIS       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 3.205

Review 7.  Recognizing and managing toxicities of molecular targeted therapies for colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Axel Grothey
Journal:  Oncology (Williston Park)       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 2.990

Review 8.  Assessment of benefits and risks in development of targeted therapies for cancer--The view of regulatory authorities.

Authors:  Francesco Pignatti; Bertil Jonsson; Gideon Blumenthal; Robert Justice
Journal:  Mol Oncol       Date:  2014-10-16       Impact factor: 6.603

Review 9.  Adaptive designs for dual-agent phase I dose-escalation studies.

Authors:  Jennifer A Harrington; Graham M Wheeler; Michael J Sweeting; Adrian P Mander; Duncan I Jodrell
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2013-03-19       Impact factor: 66.675

10.  Phase I/II study of sequential therapy with irinotecan and S-1 for metastatic colorectal cancer.

Authors:  T Yoshioka; S Kato; M Gamoh; N Chiba; T Suzuki; N Sakayori; S Kato; H Shibata; H Shimodaira; K Otsuka; Y Kakudo; S Takahashi; C Ishioka
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2009-11-17       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  25 in total

1.  A phase 1b dose expansion study of the pan-class I PI3K inhibitor buparlisib (BKM120) plus carboplatin and paclitaxel in PTEN deficient tumors and with dose intensified carboplatin and paclitaxel.

Authors:  Lillian M Smyth; Kelsey R Monson; Komal Jhaveri; Alexander Drilon; Bob T Li; Wassim Abida; Gopa Iyer; John F Gerecitano; Mrinal Gounder; James J Harding; Martin H Voss; Vicky Makker; Alan L Ho; Pedram Razavi; Alexia Iasonos; Philip Bialer; Mario E Lacouture; Jerrold B Teitcher; Joseph P Erinjeri; Nora Katabi; Matthew G Fury; David M Hyman
Journal:  Invest New Drugs       Date:  2017-03-09       Impact factor: 3.850

2.  Cancer-Related Internet Use and Online Social Networking Among Patients in an Early-Phase Clinical Trials Clinic at a Comprehensive Cancer Center.

Authors:  Goldy C George; Adrianna Buford; Kenneth Hess; Sarina A Piha-Paul; Ralph Zinner; Vivek Subbiah; Christina Hinojosa; Charles S Cleeland; Funda Meric-Bernstam; Elmer V Bernstam; David S Hong
Journal:  JCO Clin Cancer Inform       Date:  2018-12

3.  Statistical justification of expansion cohorts in phase 1 cancer trials.

Authors:  Ali A Mokdad; Xian-Jin Xie; Hong Zhu; David E Gerber; Daniel F Heitjan
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2018-07-05       Impact factor: 6.860

4.  On the relative efficiency of model-assisted designs: a conditional approach.

Authors:  Ruitao Lin; Ying Yuan
Journal:  J Biopharm Stat       Date:  2019-06-29       Impact factor: 1.051

5.  ANALYSIS OF "LEARN-AS-YOU-GO" (LAGO) STUDIES.

Authors:  Daniel Nevo; Judith J Lok; Donna Spiegelman
Journal:  Ann Stat       Date:  2021-04-02       Impact factor: 4.904

Review 6.  Global trends in the distribution of cancer types among patients in oncology phase I trials, 1991-2015.

Authors:  Kota Itahashi; Toshio Shimizu; Takafumi Koyama; Shunsuke Kondo; Yutaka Fujiwara; Noboru Yamamoto
Journal:  Invest New Drugs       Date:  2018-08-07       Impact factor: 3.850

7.  National Maintenance Cost for Precision Diagnostics Under the Verifying Accurate Leading-Edge In Vitro Clinical Test Development (VALID) Act of 2020.

Authors:  Richard Huang; Laura Lasiter; Adam Bard; Bruce Quinn; Christina Young; Roberto Salgado; Jeff Allen; Jochen K Lennerz
Journal:  JCO Oncol Pract       Date:  2021-04-21

8.  Seamless phase I/II design for novel anticancer agents with competing disease progression.

Authors:  Lucie Biard; Shing M Lee; Bin Cheng
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2021-07-02       Impact factor: 2.497

9.  Synergistic and targeted therapy with a procaspase-3 activator and temozolomide extends survival in glioma rodent models and is feasible for the treatment of canine malignant glioma patients.

Authors:  Avadhut D Joshi; Rachel C Botham; Lisa J Schlein; Howard S Roth; Antonella Mangraviti; Alexandra Borodovsky; Betty Tyler; Steve Joslyn; Jayme S Looper; Michael Podell; Timothy M Fan; Paul J Hergenrother; Gregory J Riggins
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-07-07

10.  Systematic comparison of the statistical operating characteristics of various Phase I oncology designs.

Authors:  Revathi Ananthakrishnan; Stephanie Green; Mark Chang; Gheorghe Doros; Joseph Massaro; Michael LaValley
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials Commun       Date:  2016-11-24
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.