Literature DB >> 24844841

Adaptive designs for identifying optimal biological dose for molecularly targeted agents.

Yong Zang1, J Jack Lee1, Ying Yuan1.   

Abstract

Background Traditionally, the purpose of a dose-finding design in cancer is to find the maximum tolerated dose based solely on toxicity. However, for molecularly targeted agents, little toxicity may arise within the therapeutic dose range and the dose-response curves may not be monotonic. This challenges the principle that more is better, which is widely accepted for conventional chemotherapy. Methods We propose three adaptive dose-finding designs for trials evaluating molecularly targeted agents, for which the dose-response curves are unimodal or plateaued. The goal of these designs is to find the optimal biological dose, which is defined as the lowest dose with the highest rate of efficacy while safe. The first proposed design is parametric and assumes a logistic dose-efficacy curve for dose finding, the second design is nonparametric and uses the isotonic regression to identify the optimal biological dose, and the third design has the spirit of a 'semiparametric' approach by assuming a logistic model only locally around the current dose. Results We conducted extensive simulation studies to investigate the operating characteristics of the proposed designs. Simulation studies show that the nonparametric and semiparametric designs have good operating characteristics for finding the optimal biological dose. Limitations The proposed designs assume a binary endpoint. Extension of the proposed designs to ordinal and time-to-event endpoints is worth further investigation. Conclusion Among the three proposed designs, the nonparametric and semiparametric designs yield consistently good operating characteristics and thus are recommended for practical use. The software to implement these two designs is available for free download at http://odin.mdacc.tmc.edu/~yyuan/ .

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24844841      PMCID: PMC4239216          DOI: 10.1177/1740774514529848

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Trials        ISSN: 1740-7745            Impact factor:   2.486


  11 in total

1.  Nontoxicity endpoints in phase I trial designs for targeted, non-cytotoxic agents.

Authors:  Edward L Korn
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2004-07-07       Impact factor: 13.506

2.  Dose escalation trial designs based on a molecularly targeted endpoint.

Authors:  Sally Hunsberger; Lawrence V Rubinstein; Janet Dancey; Edward L Korn
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2005-07-30       Impact factor: 2.373

Review 3.  An overview of the optimal planning, design, and conduct of phase I studies of new therapeutics.

Authors:  Patricia M LoRusso; Scott A Boerner; Lesley Seymour
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2010-03-09       Impact factor: 12.531

4.  Phase I oncology studies: evidence that in the era of targeted therapies patients on lower doses do not fare worse.

Authors:  Rajul K Jain; J Jack Lee; David Hong; Maurie Markman; Jing Gong; Aung Naing; Jennifer Wheler; Razelle Kurzrock
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2010-02-09       Impact factor: 12.531

5.  Seamless phase I-II trial design for assessing toxicity and efficacy for targeted agents.

Authors:  Antje Hoering; Mike LeBlanc; John Crowley
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2010-12-06       Impact factor: 12.531

Review 6.  Early oncology clinical trial design in the era of molecular-targeted agents.

Authors:  Andre T Brunetto; Rebecca S Kristeleit; Johann S de Bono
Journal:  Future Oncol       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 3.404

7.  Model-based phase I designs incorporating toxicity and efficacy for single and dual agent drug combinations: methods and challenges.

Authors:  Sumithra J Mandrekar; Rui Qin; Daniel J Sargent
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2010-05-10       Impact factor: 2.373

Review 8.  Phase I trial design for solid tumor studies of targeted, non-cytotoxic agents: theory and practice.

Authors:  Wendy R Parulekar; Elizabeth A Eisenhauer
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2004-07-07       Impact factor: 13.506

9.  Potential relevance of bell-shaped and u-shaped dose-responses for the therapeutic targeting of angiogenesis in cancer.

Authors:  Andrew R Reynolds
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2010-04-23       Impact factor: 2.658

Review 10.  Dose escalation methods in phase I cancer clinical trials.

Authors:  Christophe Le Tourneau; J Jack Lee; Lillian L Siu
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2009-05-12       Impact factor: 13.506

View more
  21 in total

1.  BOIN12: Bayesian Optimal Interval Phase I/II Trial Design for Utility-Based Dose Finding in Immunotherapy and Targeted Therapies.

Authors:  Ruitao Lin; Yanhong Zhou; Fangrong Yan; Daniel Li; Ying Yuan
Journal:  JCO Precis Oncol       Date:  2020-11-16

2.  Adaptive clinical trial designs in oncology.

Authors:  Yong Zang; J Jack Lee
Journal:  Chin Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-12

3.  A Phase I/II adaptive design to determine the optimal treatment regimen from a set of combination immunotherapies in high-risk melanoma.

Authors:  Nolan A Wages; Craig L Slingluff; Gina R Petroni
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2015-01-29       Impact factor: 2.226

Review 4.  Implementation of adaptive methods in early-phase clinical trials.

Authors:  Gina R Petroni; Nolan A Wages; Gautier Paux; Frédéric Dubois
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2016-02-29       Impact factor: 2.373

5.  A Phase I/II adaptive design for heterogeneous groups with application to a stereotactic body radiation therapy trial.

Authors:  Nolan A Wages; Paul W Read; Gina R Petroni
Journal:  Pharm Stat       Date:  2015-05-11       Impact factor: 1.894

6.  A robust two-stage design identifying the optimal biological dose for phase I/II clinical trials.

Authors:  Yong Zang; J Jack Lee
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2016-08-18       Impact factor: 2.373

7.  The Impact of Early-Phase Trial Design in the Drug Development Process.

Authors:  Mark R Conaway; Gina R Petroni
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2018-10-16       Impact factor: 12.531

8.  Keyboard: A Novel Bayesian Toxicity Probability Interval Design for Phase I Clinical Trials.

Authors:  Fangrong Yan; Sumithra J Mandrekar; Ying Yuan
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2017-05-25       Impact factor: 12.531

9.  Seamless phase I/II design for novel anticancer agents with competing disease progression.

Authors:  Lucie Biard; Shing M Lee; Bin Cheng
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2021-07-02       Impact factor: 2.497

10.  Designing Dose-Finding Phase I Clinical Trials: Top 10 Questions That Should Be Discussed With Your Statistician.

Authors:  Shing M Lee; Nolan A Wages; Karyn A Goodman; A Craig Lockhart
Journal:  JCO Precis Oncol       Date:  2021-02-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.