Literature DB >> 20411377

Functional tests should be accentuated more in the decision for ACL reconstruction.

Ingrid Eitzen1, Håvard Moksnes, Lynn Snyder-Mackler, Lars Engebretsen, May Arna Risberg.   

Abstract

A high pre-injury activity level, the desire of the patient to continue pivoting sports and fear of future give-way episodes are considered the most significant factors affecting the decision to perform anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. However, since the functional status of the knee at the time of surgery affects the final outcome, assessments of knee function should be considered in the decision making for surgery. Individuals with anterior cruciate ligament injury can be classified as potential copers or non-copers from an existing screening examination. The purpose of this study was to investigate whether the functional tests incorporated in the original screening examination could contribute to explain those who later go through anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction and to examine whether changes to the content or the time of conducting the screening examination (before or after ten sessions of exercise therapy) could improve its explanatory value. One-hundred and forty-five individuals were included and prospectively followed for 15 months, after where 51% had gone through anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction and 49% were managed non-operatively. The only significant baseline differences between those who later went through anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction and those who were non-operatively treated were that those who had surgery were younger and had a higher activity level (P < 0.05). Regression analyses revealed that the explanatory value for those who later went through anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction significantly improved when the original screening examination was considered compared to only age, activity level and give-way episodes. Changes to the content further improved the explanatory value, with quadriceps muscle strength as the single variable with the highest impact. Finally, conducting the screening examination after ten sessions of progressive exercise therapy gave the overall highest explanatory values, suggesting that the screening examination should be conducted subsequent to a short period of rehabilitation to inform decision making for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20411377      PMCID: PMC3158985          DOI: 10.1007/s00167-010-1113-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc        ISSN: 0942-2056            Impact factor:   4.342


  35 in total

1.  Who chooses anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction and why? A 2-year prospective study.

Authors:  L R Swirtun; K Eriksson; P Renström
Journal:  Scand J Med Sci Sports       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 4.221

2.  Responsiveness of the International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective Knee Form.

Authors:  James J Irrgang; Allen F Anderson; Arthur L Boland; Christopher D Harner; Philippe Neyret; John C Richmond; K Donald Shelbourne
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2006-07-26       Impact factor: 6.202

3.  A 6-year follow-up of the effect of graft site on strength, stability, range of motion, function, and joint degeneration after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: patellar tendon versus semitendinosus and Gracilis tendon graft.

Authors:  Susan L Keays; Joanne E Bullock-Saxton; Anthony C Keays; Peter A Newcombe; Margaret I Bullock
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2007-02-22       Impact factor: 6.202

4.  Hop testing provides a reliable and valid outcome measure during rehabilitation after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Andrea Reid; Trevor B Birmingham; Paul W Stratford; Greg K Alcock; J Robert Giffin
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  2007-02-20

5.  A 10-year prospective trial of a patient management algorithm and screening examination for highly active individuals with anterior cruciate ligament injury: Part 1, outcomes.

Authors:  Wendy J Hurd; Michael J Axe; Lynn Snyder-Mackler
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2007-10-16       Impact factor: 6.202

Review 6.  Neuromuscular consequences of anterior cruciate ligament injury.

Authors:  Christopher D Ingersoll; Terry L Grindstaff; Brian G Pietrosimone; Joseph M Hart
Journal:  Clin Sports Med       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 2.182

Review 7.  Maximizing quadriceps strength after ACL reconstruction.

Authors:  Riann M Palmieri-Smith; Abbey C Thomas; Edward M Wojtys
Journal:  Clin Sports Med       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 2.182

Review 8.  Prognosis of conservatively managed anterior cruciate ligament injury: a systematic review.

Authors:  Qassim I Muaidi; Leslie L Nicholson; Kathryn M Refshauge; Robert D Herbert; Christopher G Maher
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 11.136

Review 9.  Exercise for treating anterior cruciate ligament injuries in combination with collateral ligament and meniscal damage of the knee in adults.

Authors:  A H Trees; T E Howe; M Grant; H G Gray
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2007-07-18

10.  A 10-year prospective trial of a patient management algorithm and screening examination for highly active individuals with anterior cruciate ligament injury: Part 2, determinants of dynamic knee stability.

Authors:  Wendy J Hurd; Michael J Axe; Lynn Snyder-Mackler
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2007-10-11       Impact factor: 6.202

View more
  19 in total

1.  Inter- and intrarater reliability of four single-legged hop tests and isokinetic muscle torque measurements in children.

Authors:  Marianne Bakke Johnsen; Ingrid Eitzen; Håvard Moksnes; May Arna Risberg
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 2.  Neuromuscular training to target deficits associated with second anterior cruciate ligament injury.

Authors:  Stephanie Di Stasi; Gregory D Myer; Timothy E Hewett
Journal:  J Orthop Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2013-10-11       Impact factor: 4.751

Review 3.  Controversies in knee rehabilitation: anterior cruciate ligament injury.

Authors:  Mathew J Failla; Amelia J H Arundale; David S Logerstedt; Lynn Snyder-Mackler
Journal:  Clin Sports Med       Date:  2015-02-27       Impact factor: 2.182

4.  Clinical Outcome Measures and Return-to-Sport Timing in Adolescent Athletes After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.

Authors:  Julie P Burland; Regina O Kostyun; Kyle J Kostyun; Matthew Solomito; Carl Nissen; Matthew D Milewski
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2018-05-30       Impact factor: 2.860

5.  Pre-operative quadriceps strength predicts IKDC2000 scores 6 months after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  David Logerstedt; Andrew Lynch; Michael J Axe; Lynn Snyder-Mackler
Journal:  Knee       Date:  2012-09-27       Impact factor: 2.199

Review 6.  Osteoarthritis prevalence following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a systematic review and numbers-needed-to-treat analysis.

Authors:  Brittney Luc; Phillip A Gribble; Brian G Pietrosimone
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2014 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.860

7.  Consensus criteria for defining 'successful outcome' after ACL injury and reconstruction: a Delaware-Oslo ACL cohort investigation.

Authors:  Andrew D Lynch; David S Logerstedt; Hege Grindem; Ingrid Eitzen; Gregory E Hicks; Michael J Axe; Lars Engebretsen; May Arna Risberg; Lynn Snyder-Mackler
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2013-07-23       Impact factor: 13.800

8.  Single-legged hop tests as predictors of self-reported knee function in nonoperatively treated individuals with anterior cruciate ligament injury.

Authors:  Hege Grindem; David Logerstedt; Ingrid Eitzen; Håvard Moksnes; Michael J Axe; Lynn Snyder-Mackler; Lars Engebretsen; May Arna Risberg
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2011-08-09       Impact factor: 6.202

9.  A pair-matched comparison of return to pivoting sports at 1 year in anterior cruciate ligament-injured patients after a nonoperative versus an operative treatment course.

Authors:  Hege Grindem; Ingrid Eitzen; Håvard Moksnes; Lynn Snyder-Mackler; May Arna Risberg
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2012-09-07       Impact factor: 6.202

10.  Single-legged hop tests as predictors of self-reported knee function after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: the Delaware-Oslo ACL cohort study.

Authors:  David Logerstedt; Hege Grindem; Andrew Lynch; Ingrid Eitzen; Lars Engebretsen; May Arna Risberg; Michael J Axe; Lynn Snyder-Mackler
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2012-08-27       Impact factor: 6.202

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.