Literature DB >> 17645372

Prognosis of conservatively managed anterior cruciate ligament injury: a systematic review.

Qassim I Muaidi1, Leslie L Nicholson, Kathryn M Refshauge, Robert D Herbert, Christopher G Maher.   

Abstract

Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) rupture is a common sporting injury, often managed surgically with patella-tendon or hamstrings-gracilis autograft. Some people who sustain the injury, request information about their prognosis if they choose to forgo surgery and opt for conservative management. Numerous studies provide data on the prognosis of conservatively managed ACL injuries. These studies have not been systematically reviewed. Thus, the aims of this systematic review are to describe the natural history and clinical course of function and proprioception in the conservatively managed ACL-deficient knee, and to identify prognostic factors. We searched MEDLINE, CINAHL, EMBASE, SportDiscus, PEDro and the Cochrane Central Register of Clinical Trials without language restrictions from the earliest record available up to July 2006. We also searched the Science Citation Index, and iteratively searched bibliographies for prospective studies of outcomes (>6 months follow-up) of conservatively managed complete ACL tears. Six criteria were used to assess the methodological quality of included studies. The main outcome measures were self-reported measures of knee function, activity level, performance in functional tasks and knee proprioception. Fifteen studies of variable methodological quality were included in the review. On average, patients with mixed or isolated ACL-deficient knees reported good knee function (87/100 Lysholm knee scale) at follow-up duration of 12-66 months. On average, functional performance assessed with the hop-for-distance test, was in the normal range. From pre-injury to follow-up there was a reduction in Tegner activity level of 21.3%. According to the methods used in the assessed studies, conservatively managed ACL-deficient knees have a good short- to mid-term prognosis in terms of self-reported knee function and functional performance. However, subjects reduced their activity levels on average by 21% following injury.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17645372     DOI: 10.2165/00007256-200737080-00004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sports Med        ISSN: 0112-1642            Impact factor:   11.136


  48 in total

1.  Reliability, validity, and responsiveness of the Lysholm knee scale for various chondral disorders of the knee.

Authors:  Mininder S Kocher; J Richard Steadman; Karen K Briggs; William I Sterett; Richard J Hawkins
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 5.284

2.  A comparison of the Lysholm and Cincinnati knee scoring questionnaires.

Authors:  S Bollen; B B Seedhom
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  1991 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 6.202

3.  Knee function after surgical or nonsurgical treatment of acute rupture of the anterior cruciate ligament: a randomized study with a long-term follow-up period.

Authors:  C Andersson; M Odensten; J Gillquist
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Isolated tear of the anterior cruciate ligament: 5-year follow-up study.

Authors:  J A Feagin; W W Curl
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  1976 May-Jun       Impact factor: 6.202

5.  The outcomes of two knee scoring questionnaires in a normal population.

Authors:  A M Demirdjian; S G Petrie; C A Guanche; K A Thomas
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  1998 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 6.202

6.  Surgical or conservative treatment of the acutely torn anterior cruciate ligament. A randomized study with short-term follow-up observations.

Authors:  M Odensten; P Hamberg; M Nordin; J Lysholm; J Gillquist
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1985-09       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Influence of supervised and nonsupervised training on postural control after an acute anterior cruciate ligament rupture: a three-year longitudinal prospective study.

Authors:  E Ageberg; R Zätterström; U Moritz; T Fridén
Journal:  J Orthop Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 4.751

8.  Rating systems in the evaluation of knee ligament injuries.

Authors:  Y Tegner; J Lysholm
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1985-09       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  Sensitivity to changes over time for the IKDC form, the Lysholm score, and the Cincinnati knee score. A prospective study of 120 ACL reconstructed patients with a 2-year follow-up.

Authors:  M A Risberg; I Holm; H Steen; B D Beynnon
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 10.  Acute low back pain: systematic review of its prognosis.

Authors:  Liset H M Pengel; Robert D Herbert; Chris G Maher; Kathryn M Refshauge
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2003-08-09
View more
  23 in total

Review 1.  Controversies in knee rehabilitation: anterior cruciate ligament injury.

Authors:  Mathew J Failla; Amelia J H Arundale; David S Logerstedt; Lynn Snyder-Mackler
Journal:  Clin Sports Med       Date:  2015-02-27       Impact factor: 2.182

2.  Knee stability and movement coordination impairments: knee ligament sprain.

Authors:  David S Logerstedt; Lynn Snyder-Mackler; Richard C Ritter; Michael J Axe; Joseph J Godges
Journal:  J Orthop Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 4.751

3.  Single-legged hop tests as predictors of self-reported knee function in nonoperatively treated individuals with anterior cruciate ligament injury.

Authors:  Hege Grindem; David Logerstedt; Ingrid Eitzen; Håvard Moksnes; Michael J Axe; Lynn Snyder-Mackler; Lars Engebretsen; May Arna Risberg
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2011-08-09       Impact factor: 6.202

Review 4.  Knee pain and mobility impairments: meniscal and articular cartilage lesions.

Authors:  David S Logerstedt; Lynn Snyder-Mackler; Richard C Ritter; Michael J Axe
Journal:  J Orthop Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 4.751

Review 5.  Reconstruction versus conservative treatment after rupture of the anterior cruciate ligament: cost effectiveness analysis.

Authors:  Mazda Farshad; Christian Gerber; Dominik C Meyer; Alexander Schwab; Patricia R Blank; Thomas Szucs
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2011-11-19       Impact factor: 2.655

6.  A pair-matched comparison of return to pivoting sports at 1 year in anterior cruciate ligament-injured patients after a nonoperative versus an operative treatment course.

Authors:  Hege Grindem; Ingrid Eitzen; Håvard Moksnes; Lynn Snyder-Mackler; May Arna Risberg
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2012-09-07       Impact factor: 6.202

7.  [Influence of anterior cruciate reconstruction on postural stability: A pre- and postoperative comparison].

Authors:  H-G Palm; S Schlumpberger; H-J Riesner; B Friemert; P Lang
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 1.000

8.  The effectiveness of Pilates for partial anterior cruciate ligament injury.

Authors:  Derya Çelik; Nilgun Turkel
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-08-01       Impact factor: 4.342

9.  [Anterior cruciate ligament ruptures and postural control: correlation of functional knee scores with computerized dynamic posturography].

Authors:  F Brattinger; B Stegmüller; H-J Riesner; B Friemert; H-G Palm
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 1.087

10.  Online registration of monthly sports participation after anterior cruciate ligament injury: a reliability and validity study.

Authors:  Hege Grindem; Ingrid Eitzen; Lynn Snyder-Mackler; May Arna Risberg
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2013-05-03       Impact factor: 13.800

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.