Literature DB >> 22926749

Single-legged hop tests as predictors of self-reported knee function after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: the Delaware-Oslo ACL cohort study.

David Logerstedt1, Hege Grindem, Andrew Lynch, Ingrid Eitzen, Lars Engebretsen, May Arna Risberg, Michael J Axe, Lynn Snyder-Mackler.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Single-legged hop tests are commonly used functional performance measures that can capture limb asymmetries in patients after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. Hop tests hold potential as predictive factors of self-reported knee function in individuals after ACL reconstruction. HYPOTHESIS: Single-legged hop tests conducted preoperatively would not and 6 months after ACL reconstruction would predict self-reported knee function (International Knee Documentation Committee [IKDC] 2000) 1 year after ACL reconstruction. STUDY
DESIGN: Cohort study (prognosis); Level of evidence, 2.
METHODS: One hundred twenty patients who were treated with ACL reconstruction performed 4 single-legged hop tests preoperatively and 6 months after ACL reconstruction. Self-reported knee function within normal ranges was defined as IKDC 2000 scores greater than or equal to the age- and sex-specific normative 15th percentile score 1 year after surgery. Logistic regression analyses were performed to identify predictors of self-reported knee function within normal ranges. The area under the curve (AUC) from receiver operating characteristic curves was used as a measure of discriminative accuracy.
RESULTS: Eighty-five patients completed single-legged hop tests 6 months after surgery and the 1-year follow-up with 68 patients classified as having self-reported knee function within normal ranges 1 year after reconstruction. The crossover hop and 6-m timed hop limb symmetry index (LSI) 6 months after ACL reconstruction were the strongest individual predictors of self-reported knee function (odds ratio, 1.09 and 1.10) and the only 2 tests in which the confidence intervals of the discriminatory accuracy (AUC) were above 0.5 (AUC = 0.68). Patients with knee function below normal ranges were over 5 times more likely of having a 6-m timed hop LSI lower than the 88% cutoff than those with knee function within normal ranges. Patients with knee function within normal ranges were 4 times more likely to have a crossover hop LSI greater than the 95% cutoff than those with knee function below normal ranges. No preoperative single-legged hop test predicted self-reported knee function within normal ranges 1 year after ACL reconstruction (all P > .353).
CONCLUSION: Single-legged hop tests conducted 6 months after ACL reconstruction can predict the likelihood of successful and unsuccessful outcome 1 year after ACL reconstruction. Patients demonstrating less than the 88% cutoff score on the 6-m timed hop test at 6 months may benefit from targeted training to improve limb symmetry in an attempt to normalize function. Patients with minimal side-to-side differences on the crossover hop test at 6 months possibly will have good knee function at 1 year if they continue with their current training regimen. Preoperative single-legged hop tests are not able to predict postoperative outcomes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22926749      PMCID: PMC3462240          DOI: 10.1177/0363546512457551

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Sports Med        ISSN: 0363-5465            Impact factor:   6.202


  52 in total

1.  A 10-year comparison of anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions with hamstring tendon and patellar tendon autograft: a controlled, prospective trial.

Authors:  Leo A Pinczewski; Jeffrey Lyman; Lucy J Salmon; Vivianne J Russell; Justin Roe; James Linklater
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2007-01-29       Impact factor: 6.202

Review 2.  Hop tests as predictors of dynamic knee stability.

Authors:  G K Fitzgerald; S M Lephart; J H Hwang; R S Wainner
Journal:  J Orthop Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 4.751

3.  Return to the preinjury level of competitive sport after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction surgery: two-thirds of patients have not returned by 12 months after surgery.

Authors:  Clare L Ardern; Kate E Webster; Nicholas F Taylor; Julian A Feller
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2010-11-23       Impact factor: 6.202

4.  Single-legged hop tests as predictors of self-reported knee function in nonoperatively treated individuals with anterior cruciate ligament injury.

Authors:  Hege Grindem; David Logerstedt; Ingrid Eitzen; Håvard Moksnes; Michael J Axe; Lynn Snyder-Mackler; Lars Engebretsen; May Arna Risberg
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2011-08-09       Impact factor: 6.202

5.  Development and validation of the international knee documentation committee subjective knee form.

Authors:  J J Irrgang; A F Anderson; A L Boland; C D Harner; M Kurosaka; P Neyret; J C Richmond; K D Shelborne
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2001 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 6.202

6.  Increase in outpatient knee arthroscopy in the United States: a comparison of National Surveys of Ambulatory Surgery, 1996 and 2006.

Authors:  Sunny Kim; Jose Bosque; John P Meehan; Amir Jamali; Richard Marder
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2011-06-01       Impact factor: 5.284

7.  The prognosis and predictors of sports function and activity at minimum 6 years after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a population cohort study.

Authors:  Kurt P Spindler; Laura J Huston; Rick W Wright; Christopher C Kaeding; Robert G Marx; Annunziato Amendola; Richard D Parker; Jack T Andrish; Emily K Reinke; Frank E Harrell; Warren R Dunn
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2010-11-17       Impact factor: 6.202

8.  Biomechanics laboratory-based prediction algorithm to identify female athletes with high knee loads that increase risk of ACL injury.

Authors:  Gregory D Myer; Kevin R Ford; Jane Khoury; Paul Succop; Timothy E Hewett
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2010-06-17       Impact factor: 13.800

Review 9.  Return to sport following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the state of play.

Authors:  Clare L Ardern; Kate E Webster; Nicholas F Taylor; Julian A Feller
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2011-03-11       Impact factor: 13.800

10.  Quadriceps muscle weakness after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a risk factor for knee osteoarthritis?

Authors:  Britt Elin Øiestad; Inger Holm; Ragnhild Gunderson; Grethe Myklebust; May Arna Risberg
Journal:  Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken)       Date:  2010-07-26       Impact factor: 4.794

View more
  104 in total

1.  Brace or no-brace after ACL graft? Four-year results of a prospective clinical trial.

Authors:  Hermann O Mayr; Paul Stüeken; Ernst-Otto Münch; Morris Wolter; Anke Bernstein; Norbert P Suedkamp; Amelie Stoehr
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2013-06-27       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  ACL surgery is not for all patients, nor for all surgeons.

Authors:  Lars Engebretsen
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Simple decision rules can reduce reinjury risk by 84% after ACL reconstruction: the Delaware-Oslo ACL cohort study.

Authors:  Hege Grindem; Lynn Snyder-Mackler; Håvard Moksnes; Lars Engebretsen; May Arna Risberg
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2016-05-09       Impact factor: 13.800

4.  Kinesiophobia after anterior cruciate ligament rupture and reconstruction: noncopers versus potential copers.

Authors:  Erin H Hartigan; Andrew D Lynch; David S Logerstedt; Terese L Chmielewski; Lynn Snyder-Mackler
Journal:  J Orthop Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2013-09-09       Impact factor: 4.751

Review 5.  Variables associated with return to sport following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a systematic review.

Authors:  Sylvia Czuppon; Brad A Racette; Sandra E Klein; Marcie Harris-Hayes
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2013-10-11       Impact factor: 13.800

6.  Functional performance 6 months after ACL reconstruction can predict return to participation in the same preinjury activity level 12 and 24 months after surgery.

Authors:  Zakariya Nawasreh; David Logerstedt; Kathleen Cummer; Michael Axe; May Arna Risberg; Lynn Snyder-Mackler
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2017-09-27       Impact factor: 13.800

7.  A novel clinical approach for assessing hop landing strategies: a 2D telescopic inverted pendulum (TIP) model.

Authors:  Robert Letchford; Kate Button; Paul Adamson; Paulien E Roos; Valerie Sparkes; Robert W M van Deursen
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-10-15       Impact factor: 4.342

8.  Drop-Landing Performance and Knee-Extension Strength After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.

Authors:  Christopher M Kuenze; Nathaniel Foot; Susan A Saliba; Joseph M Hart
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2015-05-15       Impact factor: 2.860

9.  Altered medial versus lateral hamstring muscle activity during hop testing in female athletes 1-6 years after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  K Briem; A M Ragnarsdóttir; S I Árnason; T Sveinsson
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-09-24       Impact factor: 4.342

10.  A Novel Mass-Spring-Damper Model Analysis to Identify Landing Deficits in Athletes Returning to Sport After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.

Authors:  Daniel K Schneider; Alli Gokeler; Egbert Otten; Kevin R Ford; Timothy E Hewett; Jon G Divine; Angelo J Colosimo; Robert S Heidt; Gregory D Myer
Journal:  J Strength Cond Res       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 3.775

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.