Literature DB >> 17940141

A 10-year prospective trial of a patient management algorithm and screening examination for highly active individuals with anterior cruciate ligament injury: Part 1, outcomes.

Wendy J Hurd1, Michael J Axe, Lynn Snyder-Mackler.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A treatment algorithm and screening examination have been developed to guide patient management and prospectively determine potential for highly active individuals to succeed with nonoperative care after anterior cruciate ligament rupture.
OBJECTIVE: To prospectively characterize and classify the entire population of highly active individuals over a 10-year period and provide final outcomes for individuals who elected nonoperative care.
METHODS: Inclusion criteria included presentation within 7 months of the index injury and an International Knee Documentation Committee level I or II activity level before injury. Concomitant injury, unresolved impairments, and a screening examination were used as criteria to guide management and classify individuals as noncopers (poor potential) or potential copers (good potential) for nonoperative care.
RESULTS: A total of 832 highly active patients with subacute anterior cruciate ligament tears were seen over the 10-year period; 315 had concomitant injuries, 87 had unresolved impairments, and 85 did not participate in the classification algorithm. The remaining 345 patients (216 men, 129 women) participated in the screening examination a mean of 6 weeks after the index injury. There were 199 subjects classified as noncopers and 146 as potential copers. Sixty-three of 88 potential copers successfully returned to preinjury activities without surgery, with 25 of these patients not undergoing anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction at the time of follow-up.
CONCLUSION: The classification algorithm is an effective tool for prospectively identifying individuals early after anterior cruciate ligament injury who want to pursue nonoperative care or must delay surgical intervention and have good potential to do so.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17940141      PMCID: PMC2891099          DOI: 10.1177/0363546507308190

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Sports Med        ISSN: 0363-5465            Impact factor:   6.202


  37 in total

1.  Knee function after surgical or nonsurgical treatment of acute rupture of the anterior cruciate ligament: a randomized study with a long-term follow-up period.

Authors:  C Andersson; M Odensten; J Gillquist
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Abnormal lower limb symmetry determined by function hop tests after anterior cruciate ligament rupture.

Authors:  F R Noyes; S D Barber; R E Mangine
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  1991 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 6.202

3.  Reliability of lower extremity functional performance tests.

Authors:  L A Bolgla; D R Keskula
Journal:  J Orthop Sports Phys Ther       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 4.751

4.  Early season anterior cruciate ligament tears. A treatment dilemma.

Authors:  W R Shelton; G R Barrett; A Dukes
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  1997 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 6.202

5.  Knee function after anterior cruciate ligament ruptures treated conservatively.

Authors:  B Engström; J Gornitzka; C Johansson; T Wredmark
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 3.075

6.  Evaluation of knee ligament injuries with the IKDC form.

Authors:  F Hefti; W Müller; R P Jakob; H U Stäubli
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 4.342

7.  Reflex inhibition of the quadriceps femoris muscle after injury or reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament.

Authors:  L Snyder-Mackler; P F De Luca; P R Williams; M E Eastlack; A R Bartolozzi
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 5.284

8.  Development of a patient-reported measure of function of the knee.

Authors:  J J Irrgang; L Snyder-Mackler; R S Wainner; F H Fu; C D Harner
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 5.284

9.  The relationship between passive joint laxity and functional outcome after anterior cruciate ligament injury.

Authors:  L Snyder-Mackler; G K Fitzgerald; A R Bartolozzi; M G Ciccotti
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  1997 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 6.202

10.  Fate of the ACL-injured patient. A prospective outcome study.

Authors:  D M Daniel; M L Stone; B E Dobson; D C Fithian; D J Rossman; K R Kaufman
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  1994 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 6.202

View more
  50 in total

1.  The effects of neuromuscular training on the gait patterns of ACL-deficient men and women.

Authors:  Stephanie L Di Stasi; Lynn Snyder-Mackler
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2011-11-05       Impact factor: 2.063

2.  You can make a difference!

Authors:  Lars Engebretsen
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  ACL surgery is not for all patients, nor for all surgeons.

Authors:  Lars Engebretsen
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  Comparing the effects of mechanical perturbation training with a compliant surface and manual perturbation training on joints kinematics after ACL-rupture.

Authors:  Zakariya Nawasreh; Mathew Failla; Adam Marmon; David Logerstedt; Lynn Snyder-Mackler
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2018-05-23       Impact factor: 2.840

5.  Kinesiophobia after anterior cruciate ligament rupture and reconstruction: noncopers versus potential copers.

Authors:  Erin H Hartigan; Andrew D Lynch; David S Logerstedt; Terese L Chmielewski; Lynn Snyder-Mackler
Journal:  J Orthop Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2013-09-09       Impact factor: 4.751

6.  High muscle co-contraction does not result in high joint forces during gait in anterior cruciate ligament deficient knees.

Authors:  Ashutosh Khandha; Kurt Manal; Jacob Capin; Elizabeth Wellsandt; Adam Marmon; Lynn Snyder-Mackler; Thomas S Buchanan
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2018-10-09       Impact factor: 3.494

7.  Anterior cruciate ligament tears: what we already know.

Authors:  Nicola Maffulli; Mattia Loppini; John B King
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2012-07-21       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 8.  Non-operative Care of the Patient with an ACL-Deficient Knee.

Authors:  Mark V Paterno
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2017-09

9.  Altered loading in the injured knee after ACL rupture.

Authors:  Emily S Gardinier; Kurt Manal; Thomas S Buchanan; Lynn Snyder-Mackler
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2012-10-23       Impact factor: 3.494

10.  Choosing surgery: patients' preferences within a trial of treatments for anterior cruciate ligament injury. A qualitative study.

Authors:  Carina A Thorstensson; L Stefan Lohmander; Richard B Frobell; Ewa M Roos; Rachael Gooberman-Hill
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2009-08-10       Impact factor: 2.362

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.