Literature DB >> 25232663

Osteoarthritis prevalence following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a systematic review and numbers-needed-to-treat analysis.

Brittney Luc1, Phillip A Gribble, Brian G Pietrosimone.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine the prophylactic capability of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction in decreasing the risk of knee osteoarthritis (OA) when compared with ACL-deficient patients, as well as the effect of a concomitant meniscectomy. We also sought to examine the influence of study design, publication date, and graft type as well as the magnitude of change in physical activity from preinjury Tegner scores in both cohorts. DATA SOURCES: We searched Web of Science and PubMed databases from 1960 through 2012 with the search terms osteoarthritis, meniscectomy, anterior cruciate ligament, anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, and anterior cruciate ligament deficient. STUDY SELECTION: Articles that reported the prevalence of tibiofemoral or patellofemoral OA based on radiographic assessment were included. We calculated numbers needed to treat and relative risk reduction with associated 95% confidence intervals for 3 groups (1) patients with meniscal and ACL injury, (2) patients with isolated ACL injury, and (3) total patients (groups 1 and 2). DATA EXTRACTION: A total of 38 studies met the criteria. Of these, 27 assessed the presence of tibiofemoral osteoarthritis in patients treated with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. DATA SYNTHESIS: Overall, ACL reconstruction (ACL-R) yielded a numbers needed to treat to harm of 16 with a relative risk increase of 16%. Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction along with meniscectomy yielded a numbers needed to treat to benefit of 15 and relative risk reduction of 11%. Isolated ACL-R showed a numbers needed to treat to harm of 8 and relative risk increase of 43%. Activity levels were decreased in both ACL-R (d = -0.90; 95% confidence interval = 0.77, 1.13) and ACL-deficient (d = -1.13; 95% confidence interval = 0.96, 1.29) patients after injury.
CONCLUSIONS: The current literature does not provide substantial evidence to suggest that ACL-R is an adequate intervention to prevent knee osteoarthritis. With regard to osteoarthritis prevalence, the only patients benefiting from ACL-R were those undergoing concomitant meniscectomy with reconstruction.

Entities:  

Keywords:  absolute risk reduction; activity level; knee; meniscectomy

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25232663      PMCID: PMC4264654          DOI: 10.4085/1062-6050-49.3.35

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Athl Train        ISSN: 1062-6050            Impact factor:   2.860


  61 in total

1.  Understanding and preventing noncontact anterior cruciate ligament injuries: a review of the Hunt Valley II meeting, January 2005.

Authors:  Letha Y Griffin; Marjorie J Albohm; Elizabeth A Arendt; Roald Bahr; Bruce D Beynnon; Marlene Demaio; Randall W Dick; Lars Engebretsen; William E Garrett; Jo A Hannafin; Tim E Hewett; Laura J Huston; Mary Lloyd Ireland; Robert J Johnson; Scott Lephart; Bert R Mandelbaum; Barton J Mann; Paul H Marks; Stephen W Marshall; Grethe Myklebust; Frank R Noyes; Christopher Powers; Clarence Shields; Sandra J Shultz; Holly Silvers; James Slauterbeck; Dean C Taylor; Carol C Teitz; Edward M Wojtys; Bing Yu
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 6.202

2.  Osteoarthritis after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using a patellar tendon autograft.

Authors:  Jong Keun Seon; Eun Kyoo Song; Sang Jin Park
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2006-01-25       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  No difference in knee function or prevalence of osteoarthritis after reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament with 4-strand hamstring autograft versus patellar tendon-bone autograft: a randomized study with 10-year follow-up.

Authors:  Inger Holm; Britt Elin Oiestad; May Arna Risberg; Arne Kristian Aune
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2010-01-23       Impact factor: 6.202

Review 4.  A systematic literature review to investigate if we identify those patients who can cope with anterior cruciate ligament deficiency.

Authors:  Lee Herrington; Elizabeth Fowler
Journal:  Knee       Date:  2006-06-27       Impact factor: 2.199

5.  A 7-year follow-up of patellar tendon and hamstring tendon grafts for arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: differences and similarities.

Authors:  Justin Roe; Leo A Pinczewski; Vivianne J Russell; Lucy J Salmon; Tomomaro Kawamata; Melvin Chew
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2005-07-07       Impact factor: 6.202

6.  Reconstructive versus non-reconstructive treatment of anterior cruciate ligament insufficiency. A retrospective matched-pair long-term follow-up.

Authors:  Nikolaus A Streich; David Zimmermann; Gerrit Bode; Holger Schmitt
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2010-12-03       Impact factor: 3.075

7.  Improved outcomes after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with quadrupled hamstring autografts and additional bone plug augmentation at five year follow-up.

Authors:  Sven Nebelung; Gregor Deitmer; Rolf Gebing; Frank Reichwein; Wolfgang Nebelung
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2012-04-27       Impact factor: 3.075

8.  Quadriceps muscle weakness after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a risk factor for knee osteoarthritis?

Authors:  Britt Elin Øiestad; Inger Holm; Ragnhild Gunderson; Grethe Myklebust; May Arna Risberg
Journal:  Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken)       Date:  2010-07-26       Impact factor: 4.794

9.  Effects of articular cartilage and meniscus injuries at the time of surgery on osteoarthritic changes after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in patients under 40 years old.

Authors:  Atsushi Ichiba; Ikuo Kishimoto
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2008-12-03       Impact factor: 3.067

10.  Prevalence of tibiofemoral osteoarthritis 15 years after nonoperative treatment of anterior cruciate ligament injury: a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Paul Neuman; Martin Englund; Ioannis Kostogiannis; Thomas Fridén; Harald Roos; Leif E Dahlberg
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2008-05-15       Impact factor: 6.202

View more
  86 in total

Review 1.  [The time-related risk for knee osteoarthritis after ACL injury. Results from a systematic review].

Authors:  G Spahn; M Schiltenwolf; B Hartmann; J Grifka; G O Hofmann; H-T Klemm
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 1.087

2.  No difference in osteoarthritis after surgical and non-surgical treatment of ACL-injured knees after 10 years.

Authors:  Dimitrios Tsoukas; Vasilios Fotopoulos; Georgios Basdekis; Konstantinos G Makridis
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-04-09       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Measures of Agility and Single-Legged Balance as Clinical Assessments in Patients With Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction and Healthy Individuals.

Authors:  Aleah N Kirsch; Stephan G Bodkin; Susan A Saliba; Joseph M Hart
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2019-10-16       Impact factor: 2.860

4.  Biochemical markers of cartilage metabolism are associated with walking biomechanics 6-months following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Brian Pietrosimone; Richard F Loeser; J Troy Blackburn; Darin A Padua; Matthew S Harkey; Laura E Stanley; Brittney A Luc-Harkey; Veronica Ulici; Stephen W Marshall; Joanne M Jordan; Jeffery T Spang
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2017-03-02       Impact factor: 3.494

5.  Neural Excitability Alterations After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.

Authors:  Brian G Pietrosimone; Adam S Lepley; Hayley M Ericksen; Amy Clements; David H Sohn; Phillip A Gribble
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2015-04-06       Impact factor: 2.860

6.  Mesenchymal stem cells and collagen patches for anterior cruciate ligament repair.

Authors:  Benjamin Gantenbein; Neha Gadhari; Samantha Cw Chan; Sandro Kohl; Sufian S Ahmad
Journal:  World J Stem Cells       Date:  2015-03-26       Impact factor: 5.326

7.  Anterior Cruciate Ligament Research Retreat VIII Summary Statement: An Update on Injury Risk Identification and Prevention Across the Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury Continuum, March 14-16, 2019, Greensboro, NC.

Authors:  Sandra J Shultz; Randy J Schmitz; Kenneth L Cameron; Kevin R Ford; Dustin R Grooms; Lindsey K Lepley; Gregory D Myer; Brian Pietrosimone
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2019-08-28       Impact factor: 2.860

8.  Long-term outcome of anterior cruciate ligament tear without reconstruction: a longitudinal prospective study.

Authors:  Christian Konrads; Stephan Reppenhagen; Daniel Belder; Sascha Goebel; Maximilian Rudert; Thomas Barthel
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2016-10-03       Impact factor: 3.075

9.  Ten-Year Outcomes and Risk Factors After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A MOON Longitudinal Prospective Cohort Study.

Authors:  Kurt P Spindler; Laura J Huston; Kevin M Chagin; Michael W Kattan; Emily K Reinke; Annunziato Amendola; Jack T Andrish; Robert H Brophy; Charles L Cox; Warren R Dunn; David C Flanigan; Morgan H Jones; Christopher C Kaeding; Robert A Magnussen; Robert G Marx; Matthew J Matava; Eric C McCarty; Richard D Parker; Angela D Pedroza; Armando F Vidal; Michelle L Wolcott; Brian R Wolf; Rick W Wright
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 6.202

10.  Quadriceps Function and Patient-Reported Outcomes After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction in Patients With or Without Knee Osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Grant E Norte; Jay Hertel; Susan A Saliba; David R Diduch; Joseph M Hart
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2018-10-05       Impact factor: 2.860

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.