Literature DB >> 17322130

A 6-year follow-up of the effect of graft site on strength, stability, range of motion, function, and joint degeneration after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: patellar tendon versus semitendinosus and Gracilis tendon graft.

Susan L Keays1, Joanne E Bullock-Saxton, Anthony C Keays, Peter A Newcombe, Margaret I Bullock.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The choice of graft material for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction remains controversial. Despite the need for well-controlled, long-term outcome studies comparing patellar tendon with hamstring grafting, few studies have followed results for more than 5 years. HYPOTHESIS: Graft source will not affect outcome 6 years after reconstruction. STUDY
DESIGN: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 2.
METHODS: Sixty-two patients with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction and 18 uninjured control subjects were studied over 6 years. Thirty-one patients received patellar tendon grafts, and 31 received hamstring tendon grafts. Assessment included knee joint stability, range of motion, muscle strength, subjective function, objective function (running, sidestepping, carioca, and hop tests), and joint degeneration.
RESULTS: Clinical stability was restored to all patients other than to the 2 hamstring graft recipients who suffered reinjuries. The KT-1000 arthrometer side-to-side differences were similar in the patellar tendon (1.9 mm) and hamstring tendon (2.0 mm) groups but were significantly greater than that of uninjured control subjects (P < .001). There were no significant strength differences between surgical and control groups, although a 6% quadriceps deficit existed after patellar tendon grafting. In the more demanding functional tests (hop and triple-hop indices and carioca), the hamstring graft recipients performed similarly to the control group, whereas a significant difference (P < .05) existed between the patellar tendon graft and the control group. The incidence of early tibiofemoral osteoarthritis was significantly greater after reconstruction using patellar tendon (62%) than after hamstring tendon grafting (33%; P = .002).
CONCLUSION: Six-year outcomes were very satisfactory irrespective of graft source. However, reconstruction using the hamstring tendons resulted in improved functional performance and a lower incidence of osteoarthritis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17322130     DOI: 10.1177/0363546506298277

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Sports Med        ISSN: 0363-5465            Impact factor:   6.202


  73 in total

1.  Current concepts for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a criterion-based rehabilitation progression.

Authors:  Douglas Adams; David S Logerstedt; Airelle Hunter-Giordano; Michael J Axe; Lynn Snyder-Mackler
Journal:  J Orthop Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2012-03-08       Impact factor: 4.751

2.  Variability in leg muscle power and hop performance after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Roland Thomeé; Camille Neeter; Alexander Gustavsson; Pia Thomeé; Jesper Augustsson; Bengt Eriksson; Jon Karlsson
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2012-02-08       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Does graft choice affect osteoarthritis development in the knee after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction?

Authors:  Oguz Cebesoy; Mehmet Subasi
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2007-07-19       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  High intensity running results in an impaired neuromuscular response in ACL reconstructed individuals.

Authors:  Kostas Patras; Giorgos Ziogas; Stavros Ristanis; Elias Tsepis; Nicholas Stergiou; Anastasios D Georgoulis
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2009-06-04       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 5.  Ipsilateral graft and contralateral ACL rupture at five years or more following ACL reconstruction: a systematic review.

Authors:  Rick W Wright; Robert A Magnussen; Warren R Dunn; Kurt P Spindler
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2011-06-15       Impact factor: 5.284

6.  The effect of patient and injury factors on long-term outcome after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Robert A Magnussen; Kurt P Spindler
Journal:  Curr Orthop Pract       Date:  2011-01-01

7.  Do graft diameter or patient age influence the results of ACL reconstruction?

Authors:  Jean Baptiste Marchand; Nicolas Ruiz; Augustin Coupry; Mark Bowen; Henri Robert
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-04-26       Impact factor: 4.342

8.  Knee extension and flexion muscle power after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with patellar tendon graft or hamstring tendons graft: a cross-sectional comparison 3 years post surgery.

Authors:  Eva Ageberg; Harald P Roos; Karin Grävare Silbernagel; Roland Thomeé; Ewa M Roos
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2008-11-04       Impact factor: 4.342

9.  Functional tissue engineering of ligament healing.

Authors:  Shan-Ling Hsu; Rui Liang; Savio Ly Woo
Journal:  Sports Med Arthrosc Rehabil Ther Technol       Date:  2010-05-21

Review 10.  New developments in osteoarthritis. Prevention of injury-related knee osteoarthritis: opportunities for the primary and secondary prevention of knee osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Charles R Ratzlaff; Matthew H Liang
Journal:  Arthritis Res Ther       Date:  2010-08-31       Impact factor: 5.156

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.