Literature DB >> 22962290

A pair-matched comparison of return to pivoting sports at 1 year in anterior cruciate ligament-injured patients after a nonoperative versus an operative treatment course.

Hege Grindem1, Ingrid Eitzen, Håvard Moksnes, Lynn Snyder-Mackler, May Arna Risberg.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Patients usually return to pivoting sports between 6 months and 1 year after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction, but no matched study has so far examined 1-year return to sport rates in nonoperatively and operatively treated ACL-injured patients. HYPOTHESIS: Anterior cruciate ligament-injured patients following a nonoperative treatment course, including recommendation of activity modification, will have lower return to pivoting sport rates than operatively treated patients 1 year after baseline testing/surgery, when matched by preinjury sports activity, age, and sex. STUDY
DESIGN: Cohort study; level of evidence, 3.
METHODS: Sixty-nine nonoperatively treated ACL-injured patients were pair-matched with 69 operatively treated patients (n = 138), based on specific preinjury sport, age, and sex. Nonoperatively treated patients were recommended not to return to level I sports. Patients were defined as nonoperatively or operatively treated according to their status at follow-up. The baseline and follow-up testing included registration of sports participation, KT-1000 arthrometer measurements, 4 hop tests, and patient-reported outcome measures. McNemars test and paired t tests or Wilcoxon test were used to compare outcomes of nonoperatively and operatively treated patients.
RESULTS: No significant baseline differences were found. At 12.9 ± 1.2 months (mean ± standard deviation) after baseline testing (nonoperative) and 12.7 ± 1.2 months after surgery (operative), there was no significant difference in overall return to sport rates (nonoperative: 68.1%, operative: 68.1%, P = 1.00), or in return to level I sport rates (nonoperative: 54.8%, operative: 61.9%, P = .66). Nonoperatively treated patients who participated in level I sports before injury had a significantly lower return to sport rate (54.8%) than nonoperatively treated patients who participated in level II sports (88.9%, P = .003). The nonoperatively treated patients had significantly higher knee joint laxity, but significantly better hop test limb symmetry indexes, Knee Outcome Survey Activities of Daily Living scores, and International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective Knee Form 2000 scores. None of the functional differences was larger than the smallest detectable difference.
CONCLUSION: Anterior cruciate ligament-injured patients following a nonoperative treatment course, including recommendations of activity modifications, and operatively treated patients did not have significantly different rates of returning to pivoting sports after 1 year in this pair-matched cohort study. Clinicians should be aware of a potentially high level of noncompliance to recommendations of activity modifications. Although these results show that it is possible for nonoperatively treated patients to return to sport after rehabilitation, future follow-ups are needed to examine whether these patients maintain sports participation over time, and what long-term consequences they may suffer regarding subsequent injuries and knee osteoarthritis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22962290      PMCID: PMC3576571          DOI: 10.1177/0363546512458424

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Sports Med        ISSN: 0363-5465            Impact factor:   6.202


  44 in total

1.  Long-term outcome of operative or nonoperative treatment of anterior cruciate ligament rupture--is sports activity a determining variable?

Authors:  C Fink; C Hoser; W Hackl; R A Navarro; K P Benedetto
Journal:  Int J Sports Med       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 3.118

2.  Dynamic stability in the anterior cruciate ligament deficient knee.

Authors:  K S Rudolph; M J Axe; T S Buchanan; J P Scholz; L Snyder-Mackler
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Current concepts for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a criterion-based rehabilitation progression.

Authors:  Douglas Adams; David S Logerstedt; Airelle Hunter-Giordano; Michael J Axe; Lynn Snyder-Mackler
Journal:  J Orthop Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2012-03-08       Impact factor: 4.751

4.  Knee function after surgical or nonsurgical treatment of acute rupture of the anterior cruciate ligament: a randomized study with a long-term follow-up period.

Authors:  C Andersson; M Odensten; J Gillquist
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Abnormal lower limb symmetry determined by function hop tests after anterior cruciate ligament rupture.

Authors:  F R Noyes; S D Barber; R E Mangine
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  1991 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 6.202

6.  Instrumented measurement of anterior knee laxity in patients with acute anterior cruciate ligament disruption.

Authors:  D M Daniel; M L Stone; R Sachs; L Malcom
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  1985 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 6.202

7.  Management of injuries to the anterior cruciate ligament: results of a survey of orthopaedic surgeons in Canada.

Authors:  F Mirza; D D Mai; A Kirkley; P J Fowler; A Amendola
Journal:  Clin J Sport Med       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 3.638

8.  Development and validation of the international knee documentation committee subjective knee form.

Authors:  J J Irrgang; A F Anderson; A L Boland; C D Harner; M Kurosaka; P Neyret; J C Richmond; K D Shelborne
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2001 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 6.202

9.  Beliefs and attitudes of members of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons regarding the treatment of anterior cruciate ligament injury.

Authors:  Robert G Marx; Edward C Jones; Michael Angel; Thomas L Wickiewicz; Russell F Warren
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 4.772

10.  Proprioception in the anterior cruciate deficient knee.

Authors:  R L Barrack; H B Skinner; S L Buckley
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  1989 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 6.202

View more
  42 in total

1.  ACL surgery is not for all patients, nor for all surgeons.

Authors:  Lars Engebretsen
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Poor knee function after ACL reconstruction is associated with attenuated landing force and knee flexion moment during running.

Authors:  Luke G Perraton; Michelle Hall; Ross A Clark; Kay M Crossley; Yong-Hao Pua; Tim S Whitehead; Hayden G Morris; Adam G Culvenor; Adam L Bryant
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2017-11-28       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  PATIENT-SPECIFIC AND SURGERY-SPECIFIC FACTORS THAT AFFECT RETURN TO SPORT AFTER ACL RECONSTRUCTION.

Authors:  Rick Joreitz; Andrew Lynch; Stephen Rabuck; Brittany Lynch; Sarah Davin; James Irrgang
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2016-04

4.  Non-operative management of a complete anterior cruciate ligament injury in an English Premier League football player with return to play in less than 8 weeks: applying common sense in the absence of evidence.

Authors:  Richard Weiler; Mathew Monte-Colombo; Adam Mitchell; Fares Haddad
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2015-04-26

5.  Younger age and hamstring tendon graft are associated with higher IKDC 2000 and KOOS scores during the first year after ACL reconstruction.

Authors:  Nina Magnitskaya; Caroline Mouton; Alli Gokeler; Christian Nuehrenboerger; Dietrich Pape; Romain Seil
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2019-05-22       Impact factor: 4.342

6.  MRI-based ACL graft maturity does not predict clinical and functional outcomes during the first year after ACL reconstruction.

Authors:  Hong Li; Jiwu Chen; Hongyun Li; Ziying Wu; Shiyi Chen
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2016-08-02       Impact factor: 4.342

7.  ACL hamstring grafts fixed using adjustable cortical suspension in both the femur and tibia demonstrate healing and integration on MRI at one year.

Authors:  Sven Putnis; Thomas Neri; Samuel Grasso; James Linklater; Brett Fritsch; David Parker
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2019-06-17       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 8.  Strategies for the prevention of knee osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Ewa M Roos; Nigel K Arden
Journal:  Nat Rev Rheumatol       Date:  2015-10-06       Impact factor: 20.543

9.  Does Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Improve Functional and Radiographic Outcomes Over Nonoperative Management 5 Years After Injury?

Authors:  Elizabeth Wellsandt; Matthew J Failla; Michael J Axe; Lynn Snyder-Mackler
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2018-06-21       Impact factor: 6.202

10.  Operative and nonoperative management of anterior cruciate ligament injury: Differences in gait biomechanics at 5 years.

Authors:  Elizabeth Wellsandt; Ashutosh Khandha; Jacob Capin; Thomas S Buchanan; Lynn Snyder-Mackler
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2020-03-20       Impact factor: 3.494

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.