Literature DB >> 19567511

Responses to online GSTM1 genetic test results among smokers related to patients with lung cancer: a pilot study.

Saskia C Sanderson1, Suzanne C O'Neill, Della Brown White, Gerold Bepler, Lori Bastian, Isaac M Lipkus, Colleen M McBride.   

Abstract

Providing smokers with personal genetic test results indicating increased lung cancer risk may increase uptake of effective smoking cessation services. Using the internet may increase reach and enable real-time assessment of how people process genetic risk information away from the clinic setting. We therefore explored smokers' responses to Web-delivered GSTM1 genetic test results indicating higher or lower lung cancer risk. Participants were smokers (n = 44) biologically related to patients with newly diagnosed lung cancer. Measures were assessed at baseline, before and immediately after receipt of online genetic test results, and at 6-month follow-up. Outcomes included accurate comprehension of results, regret about being tested, cessation-related cognitions (e.g., perceived response efficacy), and uptake of free smoking cessation services (nicotine replacement therapy, printed self-help materials, telephone counseling sessions). Twenty-two "relative smokers" received a GSTM1-missing (higher risk) and 22 a GSTM1-present (lower risk) result. All relative smokers with GSTM1-missing results and 55% of those with GSTM1-present results accurately interpreted their results. No relative smokers regretted having taken the test. Relative smokers receiving GSTM1-missing results reported lower confidence that quitting could reduce lung cancer risk (perceived response efficacy) than those receiving GSTM1-present results. There were no other significant between-group differences. Uptake of smoking cessation services was high (e.g., 91% nicotine replacement therapy uptake). Genetic test results may not influence uptake of free smoking cessation services because of ceiling effects. Further research is needed to determine the risks and benefits of Web-based disclosure of genetic test results.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19567511      PMCID: PMC3417294          DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-08-0620

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev        ISSN: 1055-9965            Impact factor:   4.254


  30 in total

1.  A meta-analysis of fear appeals: implications for effective public health campaigns.

Authors:  K Witte; M Allen
Journal:  Health Educ Behav       Date:  2000-10

2.  Incorporating genetic susceptibility feedback into a smoking cessation program for African-American smokers with low income.

Authors:  Colleen M McBride; Gerold Bepler; Isaac M Lipkus; Pauline Lyna; Greg Samsa; Jennifer Albright; Santanu Datta; Barbara K Rimer
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 4.254

3.  Understanding the potential of teachable moments: the case of smoking cessation.

Authors:  C M McBride; K M Emmons; I M Lipkus
Journal:  Health Educ Res       Date:  2003-04

Review 4.  Comparison processes in social judgment: mechanisms and consequences.

Authors:  Thomas Mussweiler
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 8.934

5.  Meta- and pooled analyses of the effects of glutathione S-transferase M1 polymorphisms and smoking on lung cancer risk.

Authors:  Simone Benhamou; Won Jin Lee; Anna-Karin Alexandrie; Paolo Boffetta; Christine Bouchardy; Dorota Butkiewicz; Jurgen Brockmöller; Margie L Clapper; Ann Daly; Vita Dolzan; Jean Ford; Laura Gaspari; Aage Haugen; Ari Hirvonen; Kirsti Husgafvel-Pursiainen; Magnus Ingelman-Sundberg; Ivan Kalina; Masahiro Kihara; Pierre Kremers; Loïc Le Marchand; Stephanie J London; Valle Nazar-Stewart; Masako Onon-Kihara; Agneta Rannug; Marjorie Romkes; David Ryberg; Janeric Seidegard; Peter Shields; Richard C Strange; Isabelle Stücker; Jordi To-Figueras; Paul Brennan; Emanuela Taioli
Journal:  Carcinogenesis       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 4.944

6.  Interpretation of genetic risk feedback among African American smokers with low socioeconomic status.

Authors:  Isaac M Lipkus; Colleen M McBride; Kathryn I Pollak; Pauline Lyna; Gerold Bepler
Journal:  Health Psychol       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 4.267

7.  Psychological and behavioural impact of genetic testing smokers for lung cancer risk: a phase II exploratory trial.

Authors:  Saskia C Sanderson; Steve E Humphries; Christina Hubbart; Eluned Hughes; Martin J Jarvis; Jane Wardle
Journal:  J Health Psychol       Date:  2008-05

8.  The Fagerström Test for Nicotine Dependence: a revision of the Fagerström Tolerance Questionnaire.

Authors:  T F Heatherton; L T Kozlowski; R C Frecker; K O Fagerström
Journal:  Br J Addict       Date:  1991-09

9.  The impact of learning of a genetic predisposition to nicotine dependence: an analogue study.

Authors:  A J Wright; J Weinman; T M Marteau
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 7.552

10.  Glutathione S-transferase M1 (GSTM1) deficiency and lung cancer risk.

Authors:  J E McWilliams; B J Sanderson; E L Harris; K E Richert-Boe; W D Henner
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 4.254

View more
  37 in total

1.  The prospect of genome-guided preventive medicine: a need and opportunity for genetic counselors.

Authors:  Julianne M O'Daniel
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2010-05-04       Impact factor: 2.537

2.  Debating clinical utility.

Authors:  Wylie Burke; A-M Laberge; N Press
Journal:  Public Health Genomics       Date:  2010-04-15       Impact factor: 2.000

3.  Utility of genome-wide association study findings: prostate cancer as a translational research paradigm.

Authors:  A R Turner; A K Kader; J Xu
Journal:  J Intern Med       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 8.989

4.  Integrating genetic studies of nicotine addiction into public health practice: stakeholder views on challenges, barriers and opportunities.

Authors:  M J Dingel; A D Hicks; M E Robinson; B A Koenig
Journal:  Public Health Genomics       Date:  2011-07-09       Impact factor: 2.000

5.  Considerations for the impact of personal genome information: a study of genomic profiling among genetics and genomics professionals.

Authors:  Julianne M O'Daniel; Susanne B Haga; Huntington F Willard
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2010-03-30       Impact factor: 2.537

6.  Concerns about unintended negative consequences of informing the public about multifactorial risks may be premature for young adult smokers.

Authors:  Erika A Waters; Caroline Kincaid; Annette R Kaufman; Michelle L Stock; Laurel M Peterson; Nicole L Muscanell; Rosanna E Guadagno
Journal:  Br J Health Psychol       Date:  2013-10-01

7.  Young smokers' interpretations of the estimated lung cancer risk associated with a common genetic variant of low penetrance.

Authors:  S C Sanderson; C M McBride; S C O'Neill; S Docherty; J Shepperd; I M Lipkus
Journal:  Public Health Genomics       Date:  2014-02-19       Impact factor: 2.000

8.  "I don't have to know why it snows, I just have to shovel it!": Addiction Recovery, Genetic Frameworks, and Biological Citizenship.

Authors:  Molly J Dingel; Jenny Ostergren; Kathleen Heaney; Barbara A Koenig; Jennifer McCormick
Journal:  Biosocieties       Date:  2017-07-11

9.  Causal beliefs about obesity and associated health behaviors: results from a population-based survey.

Authors:  Catharine Wang; Elliot J Coups
Journal:  Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act       Date:  2010-03-03       Impact factor: 6.457

10.  Consumers' use of web-based information and their decisions about multiplex genetic susceptibility testing.

Authors:  Kimberly A Kaphingst; Colleen M McBride; Christopher Wade; Sharon Hensley Alford; Lawrence C Brody; Andreas D Baxevanis
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2010-09-29       Impact factor: 5.428

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.