Literature DB >> 22180182

"It's not like judgment day": public understanding of and reactions to personalized genomic risk information.

Erynn S Gordon1, Georgia Griffin, Lisa Wawak, Hauchie Pang, Sarah E Gollust, Barbara A Bernhardt.   

Abstract

The value of genomic risk assessment depends upon patients making appropriate behavioral changes in response to increased risk leading to disease prevention and early detection. To date, few studies have investigated consumers' response to personalized genomic disease risk information. To address this gap, we conducted semi-structured interviews with 60 adults participating in the Coriell Personalized Medicine Collaborative. The interviews took place after receiving results providing genomic and other risk information for up to eight common complex diseases. We found that participants were most likely to recall results which conferred an increased risk or those of particular personal interest. Participants understood the multi-factorial nature of common complex disease, and generally did not have negative emotional responses or overly deterministic perceptions of their results. Although most participants expressed a desire to use results to improve their health, a minority had actually taken action (behavior change or shared results with their doctor) at the time of the interview. These results suggest that participants have a reasonable understanding of genomic risk information and that provision of genomic risk information may motivate behavior change in some individuals; however additional work is needed to better understand the lack of change seen in the majority of participants.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22180182      PMCID: PMC3348376          DOI: 10.1007/s10897-011-9476-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Genet Couns        ISSN: 1059-7700            Impact factor:   2.537


  44 in total

1.  A vision for the future of genomics research.

Authors:  Francis S Collins; Eric D Green; Alan E Guttmacher; Mark S Guyer
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2003-04-14       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  The prospect of genome-guided preventive medicine: a need and opportunity for genetic counselors.

Authors:  Julianne M O'Daniel
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2010-05-04       Impact factor: 2.537

3.  Potential etiologic and functional implications of genome-wide association loci for human diseases and traits.

Authors:  Lucia A Hindorff; Praveen Sethupathy; Heather A Junkins; Erin M Ramos; Jayashri P Mehta; Francis S Collins; Teri A Manolio
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-05-27       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  How inclusion of genetic counselors on the research team can benefit translational science.

Authors:  Heather Zierhut; Jehannine Austin
Journal:  Sci Transl Med       Date:  2011-03-16       Impact factor: 17.956

5.  Considerations for the impact of personal genome information: a study of genomic profiling among genetics and genomics professionals.

Authors:  Julianne M O'Daniel; Susanne B Haga; Huntington F Willard
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2010-03-30       Impact factor: 2.537

6.  Social networkers' attitudes toward direct-to-consumer personal genome testing.

Authors:  Amy L McGuire; Christina M Diaz; Tao Wang; Susan G Hilsenbeck
Journal:  Am J Bioeth       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 11.229

7.  Genetic risk estimation in the Coriell Personalized Medicine Collaborative.

Authors:  Catharine B Stack; Neda Gharani; Erynn S Gordon; Tara Schmidlen; Michael F Christman; Margaret A Keller
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 8.822

8.  Feeling at risk: how women interpret their familial breast cancer risk.

Authors:  Sandra van Dijk; Wilma Otten; Christi J van Asperen; Danielle R M Timmermans; Aad Tibben; Moniek W Zoeteweij; Sylvia Silberg; Martijn H Breuning; Job Kievit
Journal:  Am J Med Genet A       Date:  2004-11-15       Impact factor: 2.802

Review 9.  Genomic and personalized medicine: foundations and applications.

Authors:  Geoffrey S Ginsburg; Huntington F Willard
Journal:  Transl Res       Date:  2009-10-01       Impact factor: 7.012

10.  Recall of disclosed apolipoprotein E genotype and lifetime risk estimate for Alzheimer's disease: the REVEAL Study.

Authors:  Susan LaRusse Eckert; Heather Katzen; J Scott Roberts; Melissa Barber; Lisa D Ravdin; Norman R Relkin; Peter J Whitehouse; Robert C Green
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 8.822

View more
  24 in total

1.  The Moral Reasoning of Genetic Dilemmas Amongst Jewish Israeli Undergraduate Students with Different Religious Affiliations and Scientific Backgrounds.

Authors:  Merav Siani; Orit Ben-Zvi Assaraf
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2015-12-07       Impact factor: 2.537

2.  Genomic counseling: next generation counseling.

Authors:  Rachel Mills; Susanne B Haga
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2013-09-12       Impact factor: 2.537

3.  Risk for Patient Harm in Canadian Genetic Counseling Practice: It's Time to Consider Regulation.

Authors:  Andrea L Shugar; Nada Quercia; Christopher Trevors; Marina M Rabideau; Sohnee Ahmed
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2016-06-07       Impact factor: 2.537

4.  Counselees' Perspectives of Genomic Counseling Following Online Receipt of Multiple Actionable Complex Disease and Pharmacogenomic Results: a Qualitative Research Study.

Authors:  Kevin Sweet; Shelly Hovick; Amy C Sturm; Tara Schmidlen; Erynn Gordon; Barbara Bernhardt; Lisa Wawak; Karen Wernke; Joseph McElroy; Laura Scheinfeldt; Amanda E Toland; J S Roberts; Michael Christman
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2016-12-05       Impact factor: 2.537

5.  Effect of direct-to-consumer genetic tests on health behaviour and anxiety: a survey of consumers and potential consumers.

Authors:  Corin Egglestone; Anne Morris; Ann O'Brien
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2013-04-03       Impact factor: 2.537

6.  Outcomes of a Randomized Controlled Trial of Genomic Counseling for Patients Receiving Personalized and Actionable Complex Disease Reports.

Authors:  Kevin Sweet; Amy C Sturm; Tara Schmidlen; Joseph McElroy; Laura Scheinfeldt; Kandamurugu Manickam; Erynn S Gordon; Shelly Hovick; J Scott Roberts; Amanda Ewart Toland; Michael Christman
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2017-03-27       Impact factor: 2.537

7.  Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing and Personal Genomics Services: A Review of Recent Empirical Studies.

Authors:  J Scott Roberts; Jenny Ostergren
Journal:  Curr Genet Med Rep       Date:  2013-09

8.  Predictors of adverse psychological experiences surrounding genome-wide profiling for disease risk.

Authors:  K M Broady; K E Ormond; E J Topol; N J Schork; Cinnamon S Bloss
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2017-11-13

9.  Behavioral and psychosocial responses to genomic testing for colorectal cancer risk.

Authors:  Kristi D Graves; Kara-Grace Leventhal; Rachel Nusbaum; Yasmin Salehizadeh; Gillian W Hooker; Beth N Peshkin; Morgan Butrick; William Tuong; Jeena Mathew; David Goerlitz; Mary B Fishman; Peter G Shields; Marc D Schwartz
Journal:  Genomics       Date:  2013-04-11       Impact factor: 5.736

10.  Impact of delivery models on understanding genomic risk for type 2 diabetes.

Authors:  S B Haga; W T Barry; R Mills; L Svetkey; S Suchindran; H F Willard; G S Ginsburg
Journal:  Public Health Genomics       Date:  2014-02-27       Impact factor: 2.000

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.