Literature DB >> 22199991

Genomic information as a behavioral health intervention: can it work?

Cinnamon S Bloss1, Lisa Madlensky, Nicholas J Schork, Eric J Topol.   

Abstract

Individuals can now obtain their personal genomic information via direct-to-consumer genetic testing, but what, if any, impact will this have on their lifestyle and health? A recent longitudinal cohort study of individuals who underwent consumer genome scanning found minimal impacts of testing on risk-reducing lifestyle behaviors, such as diet and exercise. These results raise an important question: is personal genomic information likely to beneficially impact public health through motivation of lifestyle behavioral change? In this article, we review the literature on lifestyle behavioral change in response to genetic testing for common disease susceptibility variants. We find that only a few studies have been carried out, and that those that have been done have yielded little evidence to suggest that the mere provision of genetic information alone results in widespread changes in lifestyle health behaviors. We suggest that further study of this issue is needed, in particular studies that examine response to multiplex testing for multiple genetic markers and conditions. This will be critical as we anticipate the wide availability of whole-genome sequencing and more comprehensive phenotyping of individuals. We also note that while simple communication of genomic information and disease susceptibility may be sufficient to catalyze lifestyle changes in some highly motivated groups of individuals, for others, additional strategies may be required to prompt changes, including more sophisticated means of risk communication (e.g., in the context of social norm feedback) either alone or in combination with other promising interventions (e.g., real-time wireless health monitoring devices).

Entities:  

Year:  2011        PMID: 22199991      PMCID: PMC3244209          DOI: 10.2217/pme.11.73

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Per Med        ISSN: 1741-0541            Impact factor:   2.512


  22 in total

1.  "Genetic exceptionalism" in medicine: clarifying the differences between genetic and nongenetic tests.

Authors:  Michael J Green; Jeffrey R Botkin
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2003-04-01       Impact factor: 25.391

2.  A vision for the future of genomics research.

Authors:  Francis S Collins; Eric D Green; Alan E Guttmacher; Mark S Guyer
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2003-04-14       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Transforming medicine via digital innovation.

Authors:  Eric J Topol
Journal:  Sci Transl Med       Date:  2010-01-27       Impact factor: 17.956

Review 4.  Playing for real: video games and stories for health-related behavior change.

Authors:  Tom Baranowski; Richard Buday; Debbe I Thompson; Janice Baranowski
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 5.043

5.  Considerations for the impact of personal genome information: a study of genomic profiling among genetics and genomics professionals.

Authors:  Julianne M O'Daniel; Susanne B Haga; Huntington F Willard
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2010-03-30       Impact factor: 2.537

6.  Health behavior changes after genetic risk assessment for Alzheimer disease: The REVEAL Study.

Authors:  Serena Chao; J Scott Roberts; Theresa M Marteau; Rebecca Silliman; L Adrienne Cupples; Robert C Green
Journal:  Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord       Date:  2008 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 2.703

Review 7.  Risk reduction and health promotion behaviors following genetic testing for adult-onset disorders.

Authors:  Theresa A Beery; Janet K Williams
Journal:  Genet Test       Date:  2007

8.  Social support in cyberspace: a content analysis of communication within a Huntington's disease online support group.

Authors:  Neil S Coulson; Heather Buchanan; Aimee Aubeeluck
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2007-07-12

9.  Interpreting risks to the public.

Authors:  J O Mason; H G Ogden; D A Berreth; L Y Martin
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  1986 May-Jun       Impact factor: 5.043

Review 10.  Effects of communicating DNA-based disease risk estimates on risk-reducing behaviours.

Authors:  Theresa M Marteau; David P French; Simon J Griffin; A T Prevost; Stephen Sutton; Clare Watkinson; Sophie Attwood; Gareth J Hollands
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2010-10-06
View more
  18 in total

1.  Does personal genome testing drive service utilization in an adult preventive medicine clinic?

Authors:  Ny Hoang; Robin Hayeems; Jill Davies; Shuye Pu; Syed Wasim; Lea Velsher; James Aw; Sébastien Chénier; Dimitri J Stavropoulos; Riyana Babul-Hirji; Rosanna Weksberg; Cheryl Shuman
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2017-04-03

2.  Implications of Personal Genomic Testing for Health Behaviors: The Case of Smoking.

Authors:  Emily Olfson; Sarah Hartz; Deanna Alexis Carere; Robert C Green; J Scott Roberts; Laura J Bierut
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2016-07-12       Impact factor: 4.244

3.  Lung cancer and family-centered patient concerns.

Authors:  Josephine Feliciano; Breanna Becker; Manish Shukla; Joann Bodurtha
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2018-03-21       Impact factor: 3.603

4.  Developing community-based health education strategies with family history: Assessing the association between community resident family history and interest in health education.

Authors:  Elizabeth C Prom-Wormley; James S Clifford; Jessica L Bourdon; Peter Barr; Courtney Blondino; Kevin M Ball; Joshua Montgomery; Jonathan K Davis; Joseph E Real; Alexis C Edwards; Dawn L Thiselton; Gwen Corley Creighton; De'Nisha Wilson; Cynthia Newbille
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2019-02-19       Impact factor: 4.634

5.  Interest and informational preferences regarding genomic testing for modest increases in colorectal cancer risk.

Authors:  A E Anderson; K G Flores; W Boonyasiriwat; A Gammon; W Kohlmann; W C Birmingham; M D Schwartz; J Samadder; K Boucher; A Y Kinney
Journal:  Public Health Genomics       Date:  2014-01-14       Impact factor: 2.000

6.  On averages and peaks: how do people integrate attitudes about multiple diseases to reach a decision about multiplex genetic testing?

Authors:  Shoshana Shiloh; Christopher H Wade; J Scott Roberts; Sharon Hensley Alford; Barbara B Biesecker
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2012-11-05       Impact factor: 2.583

7.  Priority of Risk (But Not Perceived Magnitude of Risk) Predicts Improved Sun-Protection Behavior Following Genetic Counseling for Familial Melanoma.

Authors:  Jennifer M Taber; Lisa G Aspinwall; Danielle M Drummond; Tammy K Stump; Wendy Kohlmann; Marjan Champine; Pamela Cassidy; Sancy A Leachman
Journal:  Ann Behav Med       Date:  2021-02-12

8.  Proof of Concept of a Personalized Genetic Risk Tool to Promote Smoking Cessation: High Acceptability and Reduced Cigarette Smoking.

Authors:  Alex T Ramsey; Jessica L Bourdon; Michael Bray; Amelia Dorsey; Maia Zalik; Amanda Pietka; Patricia Salyer; Li-Shiun Chen; Timothy B Baker; Marcus R Munafò; Laura J Bierut
Journal:  Cancer Prev Res (Phila)       Date:  2020-09-21

9.  Effects of health literacy skills, educational attainment, and level of melanoma risk on responses to personalized genomic testing.

Authors:  Kimberly A Kaphingst; Erva Khan; Kirsten Meyer White; Andrew Sussman; Dolores Guest; Elizabeth Schofield; Yvonne T Dailey; Erika Robers; Matthew R Schwartz; Yuelin Li; David Buller; Keith Hunley; Marianne Berwick; Jennifer L Hay
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2020-08-01

10.  Examining the impact of genetic testing for type 2 diabetes on health behaviors: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Corrine I Voils; Cynthia J Coffman; David Edelman; Matthew L Maciejewski; Janet M Grubber; Azita Sadeghpour; Alex Cho; Jamiyla McKenzie; Francoise Blanpain; Maren Scheuner; Margarete Sandelowski; M Patrick Gallagher; Geoffrey S Ginsburg; William S Yancy
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2012-08-01       Impact factor: 2.279

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.